Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2012 Sep;28(9):500-5. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2012.04.008. Epub 2012 Jul 7.
The aims of this study were to examine the factor structure, internal consistency, 1-month test-retest reliability, and congruent validity of the Chinese version of the School Bullying Experience Questionnaire (C-SBEQ). Study 1, in which 5751 Taiwanese adolescents in Southern Taiwan participated, examined the adequacy of the original four-factor structure of the C-SBEQ using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and internal-consistency reliability using Cronbach α. Study 2, in which 108 adolescents in Southern Taiwan participated, examined the 1-month test-retest reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). We examined the congruent validity of the C-SBEQ by examining the consistency between self-reported and teacher- and classmate-nominated experiences of bullying involvement in Study 2. The results of CFA supported the four-factor structure of the C-SBEQ in Taiwanese adolescents. The test-retest and internal reliability values of all subscales of the C-SBEQ were at acceptable to satisfactory levels. Nominated adolescents had significantly higher self-reported scores on three C-SBEQ subscales than non-nominated ones, and the levels of agreement between self-reported and nominated victims were moderate. The results of this study indicate that the C-SBEQ is appropriate for assessing bullying experiences in Taiwanese adolescents.
本研究旨在检验中文版校园欺凌经历问卷（C-SBEQ）的结构因素、内部一致性、1 个月重测信度和同时效度。研究 1 纳入了来自台湾南部地区的 5751 名青少年，使用验证性因子分析（CFA）检验 C-SBEQ 的原始四因素结构的适宜性，并使用克朗巴赫α检验内部一致性信度。研究 2 纳入了来自台湾南部地区的 108 名青少年，使用组内相关系数（ICC）检验 1 个月重测信度。在研究 2 中，我们通过检验自我报告与教师和同学提名的欺凌经历之间的一致性来检验 C-SBEQ 的同时效度。CFA 的结果支持了台湾青少年 C-SBEQ 的四因素结构。C-SBEQ 所有分量表的重测信度和内部信度值均处于可接受至满意的水平。被提名的青少年在 C-SBEQ 的三个分量表上的自我报告得分显著高于未被提名的青少年，自我报告和提名受害者之间的一致性水平为中等。本研究结果表明，C-SBEQ 适用于评估台湾青少年的欺凌经历。
