• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多模态线索诱发先前进入的多感觉整合证据。

Evidence for multisensory integration in the elicitation of prior entry by bimodal cues.

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

出版信息

Exp Brain Res. 2012 Oct;222(1-2):11-20. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3191-8. Epub 2012 Jul 28.

DOI:10.1007/s00221-012-3191-8
PMID:22975896
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3442165/
Abstract

This study reports an experiment investigating the relative effects of intramodal, crossmodal and bimodal cues on visual and auditory temporal order judgements. Pairs of visual or auditory targets, separated by varying stimulus onset asynchronies, were presented to either side of a central fixation (±45°), and participants were asked to identify the target that had occurred first. In some of the trials, one of the targets was preceded by a short, non-predictive visual, auditory or audiovisual cue stimulus. The cue and target stimuli were presented at the exact same locations in space. The point of subjective simultaneity revealed a consistent spatiotemporal bias towards targets at the cued location. For the visual targets, the intramodal cue elicited the largest, and the crossmodal cue the smallest, bias. The bias elicited by the bimodal cue fell between the intramodal and crossmodal cue biases, with significant differences between all cue types. The pattern for the auditory targets was similar apart from a scaling factor and greater variance, so the differences between the cue conditions did not reach significance. These results provide evidence for multisensory integration in exogenous attentional cueing. The magnitude of the bimodal cueing effect was equivalent to the average of the facilitation elicited by the intramodal and crossmodal cues. Under the assumption that the visual and auditory cues were equally informative, this is consistent with the notion that exogenous attention, like perception, integrates multimodal information in an optimal way.

摘要

本研究报告了一项实验,该实验调查了模态内、跨模态和双模态线索对视觉和听觉时间顺序判断的相对影响。在中央注视点(±45°)的两侧呈现一对视觉或听觉目标,并用不同的刺激起始时间间隔将其隔开,并要求参与者识别先出现的目标。在一些试验中,一个目标之前会出现一个短的、非预测性的视觉、听觉或视听提示刺激。提示和目标刺激在空间上完全相同的位置呈现。主观同时性的位置揭示了一个一致的、偏向于提示位置的时空偏差。对于视觉目标,内模态提示引起的偏差最大,而跨模态提示引起的偏差最小。双模态提示引起的偏差介于内模态和跨模态提示之间,所有提示类型之间均存在显著差异。对于听觉目标,除了比例因子和更大的方差外,模式相似,因此提示条件之间的差异没有达到显著水平。这些结果为外源性注意提示中的多感觉整合提供了证据。双模态提示的效果大小与内模态和跨模态提示引起的促进作用的平均值相当。假设视觉和听觉提示同样有信息量,这与外源性注意力像感知一样以最佳方式整合多模态信息的观点一致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d3f/3442165/1bff36effee9/221_2012_3191_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d3f/3442165/acf223cd7ebc/221_2012_3191_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d3f/3442165/34e6b13c81e7/221_2012_3191_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d3f/3442165/1bff36effee9/221_2012_3191_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d3f/3442165/acf223cd7ebc/221_2012_3191_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d3f/3442165/34e6b13c81e7/221_2012_3191_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d3f/3442165/1bff36effee9/221_2012_3191_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evidence for multisensory integration in the elicitation of prior entry by bimodal cues.多模态线索诱发先前进入的多感觉整合证据。
Exp Brain Res. 2012 Oct;222(1-2):11-20. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3191-8. Epub 2012 Jul 28.
2
Cue modality modulates interaction between exogenous spatial attention and audiovisual integration.线索模态调节外源性空间注意与视听整合之间的相互作用。
Exp Brain Res. 2024 Dec 19;243(1):26. doi: 10.1007/s00221-024-06970-0.
3
The role of preparation and cue-modality in crossmodal task switching.准备工作和线索模态在跨通道任务切换中的作用。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Jul;134(3):318-22. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.03.004.
4
Spatial attention triggered by unimodal, crossmodal, and bimodal exogenous cues: a comparison of reflexive orienting mechanisms.由单峰、跨峰和双峰外源性线索触发的空间注意:反射性定向机制的比较。
Exp Brain Res. 2006 Aug;173(1):40-8. doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0361-6. Epub 2006 Feb 18.
5
The role of crossmodal competition and dimensional overlap in crossmodal attention switching.跨通道竞争和维度重叠在跨通道注意转换中的作用。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015 Feb;155:67-76. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.12.006. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
6
On the relative contributions of multisensory integration and crossmodal exogenous spatial attention to multisensory response enhancement.多感觉整合和跨模态外源性空间注意对多感觉反应增强的相对贡献
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015 Nov;162:20-8. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.09.010. Epub 2015 Oct 2.
7
Cross-modal cueing in audiovisual spatial attention.视听空间注意中的跨模态线索提示
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Oct;77(7):2356-76. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-0920-7.
8
Competition between auditory and visual spatial cues during visual task performance.视觉任务执行过程中听觉和视觉空间线索之间的竞争。
Exp Brain Res. 2009 Jun;195(4):593-602. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-1829-y. Epub 2009 May 13.
9
Bimodal-divided attention attenuates visually induced inhibition of return with audiovisual targets.双峰分散注意力会减弱视听目标的视觉诱发返回抑制。
Exp Brain Res. 2019 Apr;237(4):1093-1107. doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05488-0. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
10
Crossmodal exogenous orienting improves the accuracy of temporal order judgments.跨通道外源性定向提高了时间顺序判断的准确性。
Exp Brain Res. 2009 Apr;194(4):577-86. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-1734-4. Epub 2009 Feb 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Temporal Characteristics on Pilots Perceiving Audiovisual Warning Signals Under Different Perceptual Loads.时间特征对不同感知负荷下飞行员感知视听警告信号的影响。
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 10;13:808150. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.808150. eCollection 2022.
2
Guiding spatial attention by multimodal reward cues.多模态奖励线索引导空间注意。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Apr;84(3):655-670. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02422-x. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
3
Violation of the Unity Assumption Disrupts Temporal Ventriloquism Effect in Starlings.

本文引用的文献

1
Multisensory integration affects visuo-spatial working memory.多感官整合影响视空间工作记忆。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Aug;37(4):1099-109. doi: 10.1037/a0023513.
2
The multifaceted interplay between attention and multisensory integration.注意与多感觉整合的多方面相互作用。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Sep;14(9):400-10. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.06.008. Epub 2010 Aug 2.
3
Attention and the multiple stages of multisensory integration: A review of audiovisual studies.注意力与多感官整合的多个阶段:视听研究综述
违反统一假设会破坏椋鸟的时间腹语效应。
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 14;9:1386. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01386. eCollection 2018.
4
Auditory and visual distractors disrupt multisensory temporal acuity in the crossmodal temporal order judgment task.在跨模态时间顺序判断任务中,听觉和视觉干扰物会干扰多感官时间敏锐度。
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 19;12(7):e0179564. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179564. eCollection 2017.
5
The interactions of multisensory integration with endogenous and exogenous attention.多感官整合与内源性和外源性注意力的相互作用。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Feb;61:208-24. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.11.002. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
6
Recalibration of the multisensory temporal window of integration results from changing task demands.多感觉整合时间窗的再校准源于任务需求的变化。
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 8;8(8):e71608. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071608. eCollection 2013.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Jul;134(3):372-84. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.03.010. Epub 2010 Apr 27.
4
Crossmodal spatial attention.跨模态空间注意。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010 Mar;1191:182-200. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05440.x.
5
Prior-entry: a review.先入为主:综述。
Conscious Cogn. 2010 Mar;19(1):364-79. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.12.001. Epub 2009 Dec 28.
6
Cross-modal cueing of attention alters appearance and early cortical processing of visual stimuli.跨模态线索注意改变视觉刺激的外观和早期皮层处理。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Dec 29;106(52):22456-61. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0907573106. Epub 2009 Dec 10.
7
Superadditive responses in superior temporal sulcus predict audiovisual benefits in object categorization.优势颞回的超相加反应预测了物体分类中的视听获益。
Cereb Cortex. 2010 Aug;20(8):1829-42. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp248. Epub 2009 Nov 18.
8
Multisensory integration: psychophysics, neurophysiology, and computation.多感官整合:心理物理学、神经生理学与计算
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2009 Aug;19(4):452-8. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2009.06.008. Epub 2009 Jul 16.
9
Challenges in quantifying multisensory integration: alternative criteria, models, and inverse effectiveness.量化多感官整合的挑战:替代标准、模型及逆效性
Exp Brain Res. 2009 Sep;198(2-3):113-26. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-1880-8. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
10
Attention in neglect and extinction: assessing the degree of correspondence between visual and auditory impairments using matched tasks.忽视和内抑制中的注意力:使用匹配任务评估视觉和听觉损伤的对应程度。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2010 Jan;32(1):71-80. doi: 10.1080/13803390902838058.