The Division of Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2010 Jan;32(1):71-80. doi: 10.1080/13803390902838058.
Claims have been made for associated degrees of impairment on both visual and auditory performance in unilateral neglect and extinction. Since this evidence is primarily based on different tests in each modality, it is difficult to properly quantify the degree of association between performance in vision and audition. The current study compares visual and auditory extinction and temporal order judgments (TOJs) in two cases with clinical visual neglect. Stimuli in both modalities were precisely matched in their temporal and spatial parameters. The results reveal a mixed pattern of association between different auditory tests and their visual counterparts. This suggests that associations between visual and auditory neglect can occur but these are neither obligatory nor pervasive. Instead, our data support models of spatial impairment in neglect and extinction that acknowledge differences in the contribution of spatial information to performance in each modality in responses to changing task demands.
有研究声称单侧忽视和失认症患者的视觉和听觉表现都存在一定程度的损伤。由于这些证据主要基于每种模态的不同测试,因此很难准确量化视觉和听觉表现之间的关联程度。本研究比较了两种临床视觉忽视患者的视觉和听觉失认及时间顺序判断(TOJ)。两种模态的刺激在时间和空间参数上都精确匹配。结果显示,不同听觉测试与其视觉对应物之间的关联存在混合模式。这表明,视觉和听觉忽视之间可能存在关联,但这种关联既不是强制性的,也不是普遍存在的。相反,我们的数据支持忽视和失认中空间损伤的模型,这些模型承认在响应不断变化的任务需求时,空间信息对每种模态的表现的贡献存在差异。