Rawal Rounak B, Gore Mitchell R, Harvey Richard J, Zanation Adam M
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, CB 7070, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7070, USA.
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2012 Oct;45(5):1127-42. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2012.06.013.
Successful outcomes of endoscopic approaches to benign sinonasal tumors have launched interest in expanding its use for sinonasal malignancy. Because of the heterogeneity and rarity of sinonasal malignancy, evidence for clinical outcomes of endoscopic approaches versus traditional craniofacial resection is low. Using the Oxford Center for Evidence-based Medicine guidelines, we present the existing evidence comparing both techniques for a variety of sinonasal malignancies.
鼻内镜治疗良性鼻窦肿瘤的成功结果引发了人们对将其应用扩展至鼻窦恶性肿瘤的兴趣。由于鼻窦恶性肿瘤的异质性和罕见性，关于鼻内镜治疗与传统颅面切除术临床疗效的证据较少。我们依据牛津循证医学中心的指南，展示了比较这两种技术用于多种鼻窦恶性肿瘤的现有证据。
