• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解决肿瘤学信息系统开发中的关键问题。

Addressing critical issues in the development of an Oncology Information System.

机构信息

Department of Computer Science, ETSI Informática, University of Málaga, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Med Inform. 2013 May;82(5):398-407. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.08.001. Epub 2012 Sep 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.08.001
PMID:22981645
Abstract

PURPOSES

This paper presents the experience on the design and implementation of a user-centered Oncology Information System developed for the Medical Oncology Department at the "Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria", in Málaga, Spain. The project focused on the aspects considered in the literature as critical factors for a successful deployment and usage of a health information system.

METHODS

System usability, adequate technology, integration of clinical routines, real-time statistical analysis of data, information confidentiality and standard protocol-based external interconnection were the key aspects considered.

RESULTS

The developed system is based on a web application with a modular and layered architecture accounting for usability, ease of maintenance and further system development. Evaluation of system usability was carried at three and fifteen months after system deployment to analyze the advantages/disadvantages experienced by the end-users.

CONCLUSIONS

A thorough prior analysis of clinical activities and workflows, the use of the adequate technology, and the availability of data analysis tools will almost guarantee success in the deployment of an Oncology Information System.

摘要

目的

本文介绍了为西班牙马拉加“Virgen de la Victoria 大学医院”的肿瘤医学科设计和实施以用户为中心的肿瘤信息系统的经验。该项目侧重于文献中被认为是成功部署和使用健康信息系统的关键因素。

方法

系统可用性、适当的技术、临床常规的整合、数据的实时统计分析、信息保密性和基于标准协议的外部互联是被考虑的关键方面。

结果

所开发的系统基于具有模块化和分层架构的 Web 应用程序,考虑了可用性、易于维护和进一步的系统开发。在系统部署后三个月和十五个月进行了系统可用性评估,以分析最终用户所经历的优缺点。

结论

对临床活动和工作流程进行彻底的预先分析、使用适当的技术以及数据分析工具的可用性几乎可以确保肿瘤信息系统的成功部署。

相似文献

1
Addressing critical issues in the development of an Oncology Information System.解决肿瘤学信息系统开发中的关键问题。
Int J Med Inform. 2013 May;82(5):398-407. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.08.001. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
2
A framework for reporting on human factor/usability studies of health information technologies.健康信息技术的人为因素/可用性研究报告框架。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;194:54-60.
3
User participation in healthcare IT development: a developers' viewpoint in Finland.用户参与医疗信息技术开发:芬兰开发者的观点
Int J Med Inform. 2014 Mar;83(3):189-200. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.12.003. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
4
User experiences with different regional health information exchange systems in Finland.用户在芬兰不同地区卫生信息交换系统中的体验。
Int J Med Inform. 2014 Jan;83(1):1-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.10.002. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
5
A study of user requests regarding the fully electronic health record system at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital: challenges for future electronic health record systems.一项关于首尔国立大学盆唐医院全电子健康记录系统用户请求的研究:对未来电子健康记录系统的挑战。
Int J Med Inform. 2013 May;82(5):387-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.08.004. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
6
National questionnaire study on clinical ICT systems proofs: physicians suffer from poor usability.全国临床信息学技术系统调查问卷研究证明:医生深受可用性差之苦。
Int J Med Inform. 2011 Oct;80(10):708-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.06.010. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
7
Development and implementation of a distributed integrated data-management system for pediatric hematology/oncology service: a modular approach for a clinical outcome and research information system.儿科血液学/肿瘤学服务分布式集成数据管理系统的开发与实施:临床结局与研究信息系统的模块化方法
J Registry Manag. 2012 Winter;39(4):147-53.
8
Commercial versus in-situ usability testing of healthcare information systems: towards "public" usability testing in healthcare organizations.医疗信息系统的商业可用性测试与实地可用性测试:迈向医疗机构中的“公众”可用性测试
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;183:157-61.
9
Sociotechnical systems as innovation systems in the medical and health domain.作为医学与健康领域创新系统的社会技术系统
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;194:35-40.
10
Trust-based information system architecture for personal wellness.用于个人健康的基于信任的信息系统架构。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2014;205:136-40.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety and usability of oncology information systems - a systematic review.肿瘤学信息系统的安全性与可用性——一项系统综述
Front Oncol. 2024 Nov 28;14:1231757. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1231757. eCollection 2024.
2
Increasing Annual Cancer Incidence in Patients Age 20-49 Years: A Real-Data Study.患者年龄在 20-49 岁之间的癌症发病率逐年上升:一项真实数据研究。
JCO Glob Oncol. 2024 Mar;10:e2300363. doi: 10.1200/GO.23.00363.
3
Significant Decrease in Annual Cancer Diagnoses in Spain during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Real-Data Study.COVID-19大流行期间西班牙年度癌症诊断数显著下降:一项真实数据研究
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jun 28;13(13):3215. doi: 10.3390/cancers13133215.
4
A Conceptual Model of an Oncology Information System.肿瘤学信息系统的概念模型
Cancer Manag Res. 2020 Jul 27;12:6341-6352. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S259013. eCollection 2020.
5
Oncology Information System: A Qualitative Study of Users' Requirements.肿瘤学信息系统:用户需求的定性研究
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019 Oct 1;20(10):3085-3091. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.10.3085.
6
Factors Influencing the Adoption of Online Health Consultation Services: The Role of Subjective Norm, Trust, Perceived Benefit, and Offline Habit.影响在线健康咨询服务采用的因素:主观规范、信任、感知利益和线下习惯的作用。
Front Public Health. 2019 Oct 4;7:286. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00286. eCollection 2019.
7
Human-centered design of a personal health record system for metabolic syndrome management based on the ISO 9241-210:2010 standard.基于ISO 9241-210:2010标准的用于代谢综合征管理的个人健康记录系统的以人为本设计。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2018 Jan 9;11:21-37. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S150976. eCollection 2018.
8
An appraisal of published usability evaluations of electronic health records via systematic review.通过系统评价对已发表的电子健康记录可用性评估进行评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Jan;24(1):218-226. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw046. Epub 2016 Apr 23.