• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在为智障人士提供服务和支持的系统及组织中使用循证结果。

The use of evidence-based outcomes in systems and organizations providing services and supports to persons with intellectual disability.

作者信息

van Loon Jos H M, Bonham Gordon S, Peterson Dale D, Schalock Robert L, Claes Claudia, Decramer Adelien E M

机构信息

Arduin Foundation, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eval Program Plann. 2013 Feb;36(1):80-7. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2012.08.002. Epub 2012 Aug 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2012.08.002
PMID:22982162
Abstract

This article describes how evidence-based outcomes (EBOs) can be used to improve clinical, managerial, and policy decisions. As a component of evidence-based practices, EBOs are defined as measures obtained from the assessment of quality of life-related indicators that are based on a cross-culturally validated quality of life conceptual and measurement model, have utility in that they can be used for multiple purposes, and have robustness in reference to reliability and validity of the assessment strategy employed. A 5-component EBO model is described that provides a framework for the activities involved in selecting, developing, and implementing evidence-based outcomes. Three international examples based on the reliable, valid, and standardized assessment of individual quality of life outcomes are presented that demonstrate how EBOs can be used to improve clinical, managerial, and policy decision making. The article concludes with a discussion of guidelines for developing and using EBOs, and the challenges involved in their use.

摘要

本文描述了循证结果(EBOs)如何用于改善临床、管理和政策决策。作为循证实践的一个组成部分,循证结果被定义为通过对与生活质量相关指标进行评估而获得的测量指标,这些指标基于经过跨文化验证的生活质量概念和测量模型,具有可用于多种目的的效用,并且在所采用评估策略的可靠性和有效性方面具有稳健性。文中描述了一个包含五个组成部分的循证结果模型,该模型为选择、制定和实施循证结果所涉及的活动提供了一个框架。文中还列举了三个基于对个体生活质量结果进行可靠、有效和标准化评估的国际实例,展示了循证结果如何用于改善临床、管理和政策决策。文章最后讨论了制定和使用循证结果的指导方针以及使用过程中涉及的挑战。

相似文献

1
The use of evidence-based outcomes in systems and organizations providing services and supports to persons with intellectual disability.在为智障人士提供服务和支持的系统及组织中使用循证结果。
Eval Program Plann. 2013 Feb;36(1):80-7. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2012.08.002. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
2
Assessing the quality of healthcare provided to children.评估为儿童提供的医疗保健质量。
Health Serv Res. 1998 Oct;33(4 Pt 2):1059-90.
3
Evidence-based practices in the field of intellectual and developmental disabilities: an international consensus approach.智力和发育障碍领域的循证实践:一种国际共识方法。
Eval Program Plann. 2011 Aug;34(3):273-82. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.10.004. Epub 2010 Nov 10.
4
Implementing and using quality measures for children's health care: perspectives on the state of the practice.实施和使用儿童保健质量指标:实践现状透视
Pediatrics. 2004 Jan;113(1 Pt 2):217-27.
5
A health outcomes framework for assessing health status and quality of life: enhanced data for decision making.一个用于评估健康状况和生活质量的健康结果框架:用于决策的强化数据。
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2004(33):168-77. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgh006.
6
How organizations can enhance the quality of life of their clients and assess their results: the concept of QOL enhancement.组织如何提高客户的生活质量并评估其结果:QOL 提升的概念。
Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2014 Jul;119(4):291-302. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-119.4.291.
7
The transformation of disabilities organizations.残疾人组织的转型。
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2013 Aug;51(4):273-86. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-51.4.273.
8
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
9
A dynamic conceptual model of care planning.护理计划的动态概念模型。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2007 Dec;21(4):530-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2007.00493.x.
10
What should the government do regarding health policy-making to develop community health care in Shanghai?政府应该在制定健康政策方面采取哪些措施来发展上海的社区卫生保健?
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2011 Oct-Dec;26(4):379-435. doi: 10.1002/hpm.1117.

引用本文的文献

1
A sector-wide response to national policy on client-centred care and support: a document analysis of the development of a range of instruments to assess clients' experiences in the care and support for people with (intellectual) disabilities.全行业对以客户为中心的护理和支持的国家政策的回应:对一系列评估客户在(智力)残疾人士护理和支持方面的体验的工具的开发进行文件分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Dec 4;21(1):1307. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07341-z.
2
Accounting for Emotional Value: A Review in Disability Organizations.情感价值考量:残障组织综述
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 24;12:741897. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.741897. eCollection 2021.
3
Differences in the support needs of children with developmental disabilities among groups of medical and behavioral needs.
发育障碍儿童在医疗和行为需求组之间的支持需求差异。
PeerJ. 2020 Sep 15;8:e9557. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9557. eCollection 2020.
4
Validation of the Portuguese version of the Personal Outcomes Scale.《个人成果量表》葡萄牙语版本的验证
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2016 May-Aug;16(2):186-200. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2015.11.002. Epub 2015 Dec 31.
5
A Structural Equation Model of the relationship between physical activity and quality of life.身体活动与生活质量关系的结构方程模型
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2016 May-Aug;16(2):147-156. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2015.11.001. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
6
Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Personal Outcomes Scale.《个人成果量表》西班牙语版的心理测量特性。
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2015 Sep-Dec;15(3):236-252. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2015.04.002. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
7
Does Quality of Life Differ for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder and Intellectual Disability Compared to Peers Without Autism?自闭症谱系障碍和智力残疾儿童的生活质量是否与非自闭症同龄人不同?
J Autism Dev Disord. 2018 Jan;48(1):123-136. doi: 10.1007/s10803-017-3289-8.
8
In search of quality indicators for Down syndrome healthcare: a scoping review.寻找唐氏综合征医疗保健的质量指标:一项范围综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Apr 18;17(1):284. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2228-x.
9
The factors associated with care-related quality of life of adults with intellectual disabilities in England: implications for policy and practice.英国成年智障人士与护理相关的生活质量相关因素:对政策和实践的启示。
Health Soc Care Community. 2017 Sep;25(5):1607-1619. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12354. Epub 2016 Apr 24.