• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Major postoperative complications after benign gynecologic surgery: a clinical prediction tool.良性妇科手术后的主要术后并发症:一种临床预测工具。
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2012 Sep-Oct;18(5):274-80. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e318263a210.
2
Postoperative complications of epidural analgesia at hysterectomy for gynecologic malignancies: an analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.妇科恶性肿瘤子宫切除术患者硬膜外镇痛的术后并发症:国家手术质量改进计划分析。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Aug;30(8):1203-1209. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001339. Epub 2020 May 25.
3
The American College of Surgeon's surgical risk calculator's ability to predict disposition in older gynecologic oncology patients undergoing laparotomy.美国外科医师学会手术风险计算器预测老年妇科肿瘤患者行剖腹术的处置能力。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2019 Jul;10(4):618-622. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.02.008. Epub 2019 Feb 23.
4
Readmission After Gynecologic Surgery: A Comparison of Procedures for Benign and Malignant Indications.妇科手术后再入院:良性与恶性指征手术的比较
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Aug;130(2):285-295. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002141.
5
Benign hysterectomy performed by gynecologic oncologists: Is selection bias altering our ability to measure surgical quality?妇科肿瘤学家施行的良性子宫切除术:选择偏倚是否改变了我们衡量手术质量的能力?
Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Oct;151(1):141-144. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.08.010. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
6
Postoperative complications after gynecologic surgery.妇科手术后的并发症。
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Oct;118(4):785-93. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31822dac5d.
7
Reduced Complications Following Implementation of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Danish Population-based Cohort Study of Minimally Invasive Benign Gynecologic Surgery between 2004 and 2018.腹腔镜子宫切除术实施后并发症减少:2004 年至 2018 年丹麦微创良性妇科手术的基于人群队列研究。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Sep-Oct;27(6):1344-1353.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.11.005. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
8
The impact of surgical complications on health-related quality of life in women undergoing gynecologic and gynecologic oncology procedures: a prospective longitudinal cohort study.手术并发症对接受妇科及妇科肿瘤手术的女性健康相关生活质量的影响:一项前瞻性纵向队列研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct;215(4):457.e1-457.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.04.025. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
9
Use of laparoscopy in older women undergoing gynecologic procedures: is it time to overcome initial concerns?腹腔镜在老年女性妇科手术中的应用:是否是时候克服最初的担忧了?
Menopause. 2010 Jan-Feb;17(1):96-103. doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e3181ade901.
10
Development of a Preoperative Clinical Risk Assessment Tool for Postoperative Complications After Hysterectomy.术前临床风险评估工具在子宫切除术后术后并发症中的应用。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2022 Mar;29(3):401-408.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.10.008. Epub 2021 Oct 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Construction and validation of nomogram to predict surgical site infection after hysterectomy: a retrospective study.构建和验证预测子宫切除术后手术部位感染的列线图:一项回顾性研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 4;14(1):20538. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71592-z.
2
Risk Assessment Model for Complications in Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy: A Pilot Study.微创子宫切除术并发症风险评估模型:一项初步研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 23;20(1):234. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010234.
3
Development of a Preoperative Clinical Risk Assessment Tool for Postoperative Complications After Hysterectomy.术前临床风险评估工具在子宫切除术后术后并发症中的应用。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2022 Mar;29(3):401-408.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.10.008. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
4
Prediction model for 30-day morbidity after gynecological malignancy surgery.妇科恶性肿瘤手术后30天发病率的预测模型
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 1;12(6):e0178610. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178610. eCollection 2017.
5
Evaluation of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Surgical Risk Calculator in Gynecologic Oncology Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Surgery.美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划手术风险计算器在接受微创手术的妇科肿瘤患者中的评估
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Jan 1;24(1):48-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.10.005. Epub 2016 Oct 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Postoperative complications after gynecologic surgery.妇科手术后的并发症。
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Oct;118(4):785-93. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31822dac5d.
2
Preoperative factors predict perioperative morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy.术前因素预测胰十二指肠切除术后围手术期的发病率和死亡率。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Aug;18(8):2126-35. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1594-6. Epub 2011 Feb 20.
3
Development and validation of a bariatric surgery morbidity risk calculator using the prospective, multicenter NSQIP dataset.使用前瞻性、多中心 NSQIP 数据集开发和验证减重手术发病率风险计算器。
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Mar;212(3):301-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.11.003. Epub 2011 Jan 17.
4
Patient and peri-operative predictors of morbidity and mortality after esophagectomy: American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP), 2005-2008.患者和围手术期因素对食管切除术术后发病率和死亡率的预测:美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP),2005-2008 年。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2010 Oct;14(10):1492-501. doi: 10.1007/s11605-010-1328-2. Epub 2010 Sep 8.
5
Frailty as a predictor of surgical outcomes in older patients.衰弱作为预测老年患者手术结果的指标。
J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Jun;210(6):901-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.01.028. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
6
Design and statistical methodology of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: why is it what it is?国家手术质量改进计划的设计和统计方法学:它为何如此?
Am J Surg. 2009 Nov;198(5 Suppl):S19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.07.025.
7
Improving quality of care: development of a risk-adjusted perioperative morbidity model for vaginal hysterectomy.提高医疗质量:阴道子宫切除术围手术期发病率风险调整模型的开发。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Feb;202(2):137.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.06.059. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
8
Perioperative complications in obese women vs normal-weight women who undergo vaginal surgery.接受阴道手术的肥胖女性与正常体重女性的围手术期并发症
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jul;197(1):98.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.03.055.
9
Preoperative hematocrit levels and postoperative outcomes in older patients undergoing noncardiac surgery.老年患者非心脏手术术前血细胞比容水平与术后结局
JAMA. 2007 Jun 13;297(22):2481-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.22.2481.
10
ACC/AHA guideline update for perioperative cardiovascular evaluation for noncardiac surgery--executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1996 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery).美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会非心脏手术围手术期心血管评估指南更新——执行摘要:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组(更新1996年非心脏手术围手术期心血管评估指南委员会)报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Feb 6;39(3):542-53. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01788-0.

良性妇科手术后的主要术后并发症:一种临床预测工具。

Major postoperative complications after benign gynecologic surgery: a clinical prediction tool.

作者信息

Erekson Elisabeth A, Yip Sallis O, Martin Deanna K, Ciarleglio Maria M, Connell Kathleen A, Fried Terri R

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06519, USA.

出版信息

Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2012 Sep-Oct;18(5):274-80. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e318263a210.

DOI:10.1097/SPV.0b013e318263a210
PMID:22983270
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3631542/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to create a clinical prediction tool to differentiate women at risk for postoperative complications after benign gynecologic surgery.

METHODS

We utilized the 2005 to 2009 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program participant use data files to perform a secondary data-set analysis of women older than 16 years who underwent benign gynecologic procedures. We then temporally divided women into 2 similar cohorts. Our derivation cohort included all women undergoing benign gynecologic procedures in 2005 to 2008. Our validation cohort included all women undergoing benign gynecologic procedures in 2009. The primary outcome, composite 30-day major postoperative complications, was analyzed as a dichotomous variable. A prediction tool was then constructed to predict the occurrence of postoperative complications built from the logistic regression model by rounding the value of each estimated β coefficient to the nearest integer. An individual's risk score was then computed by summing the number of points based on her preoperative characteristics. This risk score was then used to categorize women into low-, medium-, and high-risk groups.

RESULTS

A prediction tool for benign gynecologic procedures identified women at low (2.7% and 2.4%), medium (6.3% and 6.8%), and high (29.5% and 23.8%) risk of complications in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A prediction tool can differentiate women at risk for postoperative complications after benign gynecologic surgery.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是创建一种临床预测工具,以区分良性妇科手术后有术后并发症风险的女性。

方法

我们利用2005年至2009年美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划参与者使用的数据文件,对16岁以上接受良性妇科手术的女性进行二次数据集分析。然后,我们将女性按时间分为两个相似的队列。我们的推导队列包括2005年至2008年接受良性妇科手术的所有女性。我们的验证队列包括2009年接受良性妇科手术的所有女性。主要结局,即30天术后主要并发症的复合情况,被分析为一个二分变量。然后构建一个预测工具,通过将每个估计的β系数值四舍五入到最接近的整数,从逻辑回归模型中预测术后并发症的发生情况。然后根据个体的术前特征计算其风险评分。然后使用该风险评分将女性分为低、中、高风险组。

结果

良性妇科手术的预测工具在推导队列和验证队列中分别识别出并发症风险低(2.7%和2.4%)、中(6.3%和6.8%)、高(29.5%和23.8%)的女性。

结论

一种预测工具可以区分良性妇科手术后有术后并发症风险的女性。