• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

什么因素影响尼泊尔分娩时清洁分娩包的使用?一项定性研究。

What affects Clean Delivery Kit utilization at birth in Nepal? A qualitative study.

作者信息

Morrison Joanna, Jacoby Caroline, Ghimire Sagar, Oyloe Peter

机构信息

University College London, London, UK

Johns Hopkins Centre for Communication Programs, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Asia Pac J Public Health. 2015 Mar;27(2):NP1263-72. doi: 10.1177/1010539512458950. Epub 2012 Sep 14.

DOI:10.1177/1010539512458950
PMID:22984132
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Infection is one of the biggest causes of maternal and neonatal death in low-income countries. Clean Delivery Kits (CDKs) promote clean delivery and neonatal care. Our qualitative research explores reasons for low CDK utilization, and describes community perceptions of CDKs in Nepal.

METHODS

We conducted 18 focus group discussions and 40 interviews with CDK users and nonusers, service providers, birth attendants, and household decision makers in 6 districts. We also conducted interviews with central level personnel. CDK users were aware of its benefits, and utilization was largely compatible with birth practices. Utilization was prevented by lack of awareness about the benefits and lack of availability. Participants believed that CDKs were for home use.

CONCLUSION

Poor promotion of CDK is related to the disjuncture of promoting CDK use, while encouraging institutional deliveries. If CDKs are made available and marketed for use in households and health institutions, utilization may increase.

摘要

背景

在低收入国家,感染是孕产妇和新生儿死亡的主要原因之一。清洁分娩包(CDK)可促进清洁分娩和新生儿护理。我们的定性研究探讨了CDK使用率低的原因,并描述了尼泊尔社区对CDK的看法。

方法

我们在6个地区对CDK使用者和非使用者、服务提供者、助产士和家庭决策者进行了18次焦点小组讨论和40次访谈。我们还对中央级人员进行了访谈。CDK使用者意识到了其好处,其使用在很大程度上与分娩习俗相符。对好处缺乏认识和难以获取导致了使用率低。参与者认为CDK是供家庭使用的。

结论

CDK推广不力与在鼓励机构分娩的同时促进CDK使用的脱节有关。如果使CDK可供家庭和医疗机构使用并进行销售,使用率可能会提高。

相似文献

1
What affects Clean Delivery Kit utilization at birth in Nepal? A qualitative study.什么因素影响尼泊尔分娩时清洁分娩包的使用?一项定性研究。
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2015 Mar;27(2):NP1263-72. doi: 10.1177/1010539512458950. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
2
Barriers and facilitators to institutional delivery in rural areas of Chitwan district, Nepal: a qualitative study.尼泊尔奇特旺地区农村地区机构分娩的障碍和促进因素:一项定性研究。
Reprod Health. 2018 Jun 20;15(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0553-0.
3
Acceptability and use of clean home delivery kits in Nepal: a qualitative study.尼泊尔清洁家庭分娩套件的可接受性与使用情况:一项定性研究
J Health Popul Nutr. 2003 Dec;21(4):367-73.
4
Impact of clean delivery kit use on clean delivery practices in Beni Suef Governorate, Egypt.埃及贝尼苏韦夫省使用清洁分娩套件对清洁分娩实践的影响。
J Perinatol. 2009 Oct;29(10):673-9. doi: 10.1038/jp.2009.80. Epub 2009 Jul 9.
5
Reasons for Preference of Home Delivery with Traditional Birth Attendants (TBAs) in Rural Bangladesh: A Qualitative Exploration.孟加拉国农村地区选择由传统接生员在家中接生的原因:一项定性探索
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 5;11(1):e0146161. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146161. eCollection 2016.
6
Perceptions of users and providers on barriers to utilizing skilled birth care in mid- and far-western Nepal: a qualitative study.尼泊尔中西部地区使用者和提供者对利用熟练助产护理的障碍的看法:一项定性研究。
Glob Health Action. 2014 Aug 11;7:24580. doi: 10.3402/gha.v7.24580. eCollection 2014.
7
Community and provider perceptions of traditional and skilled birth attendants providing maternal health care for pastoralist communities in Kenya: a qualitative study.肯尼亚牧民社区中传统接生员和熟练接生员提供孕产妇保健服务的社区及提供者认知:一项定性研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Mar 1;16:43. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0828-9.
8
Perceptions, careseeking, and experiences pertaining to non-cephalic births in rural Sarlahi District, Nepal: a qualitative study.尼泊尔萨拉希县农村地区与非头部分娩相关的认知、寻求照护和体验:一项定性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Apr 10;18(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1724-2.
9
Safe delivery care practices in western Nepal: Does women's autonomy influence the utilization of skilled care at birth?尼泊尔西部的安全分娩护理实践:女性自主权是否会影响分娩时熟练护理的利用情况?
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 3;12(8):e0182485. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182485. eCollection 2017.
10
Exploring the first delay: a qualitative study of home deliveries in Makwanpur district Nepal.探究首次延迟:尼泊尔马克万布尔区家庭分娩的定性研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Feb 27;14:89. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-89.

引用本文的文献

1
Clean delivery kit use in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.中低收入国家使用清洁接生包:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Nov 27;24(1):791. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06913-1.
2
Safe delivery kits and newborn infection in rural Ethiopian communities.安全分娩包与农村埃塞俄比亚社区新生儿感染。
Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 9;12:1305255. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1305255. eCollection 2024.
3
Effect of a community based social marketing strategy on the uptake of clean delivery kits in peri-urban communities of Karachi, Pakistan.
社区为基础的社会营销策略对巴基斯坦卡拉奇城乡结合部地区清洁分娩包使用的影响。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 May 28;22(1):447. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04705-z.
4
Effectiveness of birthing kits for clean childbirth: a systematic review.分娩套件在清洁分娩中的效果:系统评价。
Int Health. 2020 Jan 1;12(1):3-10. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihz022.
5
Associations between birth kit use and maternal and neonatal health outcomes in rural Jigawa state, Nigeria: A secondary analysis of data from a cluster randomized controlled trial.在尼日利亚吉加瓦州农村,使用产包与母婴健康结局的关联:一项基于群组随机对照试验数据的二次分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 26;13(12):e0208885. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208885. eCollection 2018.
6
Supply kits for antenatal and childbirth care during antenatal care and delivery: a mixed-methods systematic review, the qualitative approach.产前护理和分娩期间的产前及分娩护理供应包:一项混合方法的系统评价,定性方法
Reprod Health. 2017 Mar 31;14(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0299-0.
7
Utilisation of health services and geography: deconstructing regional differences in barriers to facility-based delivery in Nepal.卫生服务利用与地理因素:剖析尼泊尔基于设施分娩的障碍中的地区差异
Matern Child Health J. 2015 Mar;19(3):566-77. doi: 10.1007/s10995-014-1540-x.