• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中低收入国家使用清洁接生包:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Clean delivery kit use in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

School of Midwifery, College of Health Science and Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia.

Department of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Science, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Nov 27;24(1):791. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06913-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12884-024-06913-1
PMID:39604903
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11600650/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of Clean Delivery Kits (CDKs) promotes healthy birth outcome. Nevertheless, representative data are lacking for low- and middle-income countries. Thus, study aimed at determining the overall estimate of clean delivery kit use among low and middle income countries.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of the Science Direct, Scopus, Google Scholar, EMBASE, and PubMed databases was part of the current investigation. Microsoft Excel (version 14) was used to extract the data, and STATA statistical software was used for analysis. The presence of publication bias was assessed using DOI Plots in the study. By calculating I and doing an overall estimation analysis, heterogeneity was evaluated. Furthermore, a subgroup analysis was carried out according to the sample size, publication year, and study design.

RESULTS

Out of 654 articles, 12 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis, covering 19,889 study participants. In low- and middle-income countries, the pooled proportion of clean delivery kits use was 54% (95%CI: 31. 60, 76.82, I = 70%). Notably, the cross-sectional study revealed the lowest incidence of delivery kit use, with a proportion of 54.29%, while the cohort study revealed the highest proportion, at 72.37%. In studies with sample sizes < 500, clean delivery kit use was higher (60.28%) compared to studies with sample sizes > 500 (45.75%). Lastly, the proportion of clean delivery kits was found to be 62.53% for studies published after 2010, compared to 48.25% for studies published before 2010.

CONCLUSION

In summary, the proportion of clean delivery kits use was 54%. Healthcare systems should focus on different strategies to improve clean delivery kit use.

摘要

背景

使用清洁分娩套件(CDK)可促进健康的分娩结果。然而,代表性数据在中低收入国家仍然缺乏。因此,本研究旨在确定中低收入国家清洁分娩套件使用的总体估计数。

方法

本研究全面审查了科学直接、Scopus、Google Scholar、EMBASE 和 PubMed 数据库。使用 Microsoft Excel(版本 14)提取数据,并使用 STATA 统计软件进行分析。使用研究中的 DOI 图评估存在的发表偏倚。通过计算 I 值并进行总体估计分析来评估异质性。此外,还根据样本量、发表年份和研究设计进行了亚组分析。

结果

在 654 篇文章中,有 12 篇符合纳入标准并纳入分析,共纳入 19889 名研究参与者。在中低收入国家,清洁分娩套件使用率的合并比例为 54%(95%CI:31.60,76.82,I=70%)。值得注意的是,横断面研究显示分娩套件使用率最低,为 54.29%,而队列研究显示使用率最高,为 72.37%。在样本量<500 的研究中,清洁分娩套件使用率较高(60.28%),而在样本量>500 的研究中,清洁分娩套件使用率较低(45.75%)。最后,发现 2010 年后发表的研究中清洁分娩套件的比例为 62.53%,而 2010 年前发表的研究中清洁分娩套件的比例为 48.25%。

结论

总的来说,清洁分娩套件的使用率为 54%。医疗保健系统应关注不同的策略,以提高清洁分娩套件的使用率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34cc/11600650/3389e94e63df/12884_2024_6913_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34cc/11600650/a35a24f02da3/12884_2024_6913_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34cc/11600650/77747dd924a4/12884_2024_6913_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34cc/11600650/2835d5ce039f/12884_2024_6913_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34cc/11600650/7f313286c55d/12884_2024_6913_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34cc/11600650/c832575a16c2/12884_2024_6913_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34cc/11600650/3389e94e63df/12884_2024_6913_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34cc/11600650/a35a24f02da3/12884_2024_6913_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34cc/11600650/77747dd924a4/12884_2024_6913_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34cc/11600650/2835d5ce039f/12884_2024_6913_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34cc/11600650/7f313286c55d/12884_2024_6913_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34cc/11600650/c832575a16c2/12884_2024_6913_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34cc/11600650/3389e94e63df/12884_2024_6913_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Clean delivery kit use in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.中低收入国家使用清洁接生包:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Nov 27;24(1):791. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06913-1.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Obstetric care provider's knowledge about the use of low dose aspirin for preeclampsia prevention in low and middle income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.产科医护人员在中低收入国家对低剂量阿司匹林用于子痫前期预防的认知:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Sep 19;24(1):611. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06803-6.
4
Male partners' participation in birth preparedness and complication readiness in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.低、中收入国家中男性伴侣参与生育准备和并发症准备情况:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Aug 14;21(1):556. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03994-0.
5
Women decision-making autonomy on maternal health service and associated factors in low- and middle-income countries: Systematic review and meta-analysis.中低收入国家妇女在孕产妇保健服务方面的决策自主性及其相关因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Womens Health (Lond). 2022 Jan-Dec;18:17455057221122618. doi: 10.1177/17455057221122618.
6
Unintended pregnancy and contraceptive use among women in low- and middle-income countries: systematic review and meta-analysis.低收入和中等收入国家女性的意外怀孕与避孕措施使用情况:系统评价与荟萃分析
Contracept Reprod Med. 2023 Nov 23;8(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s40834-023-00255-7.
7
Prevalence and associated factors of head lice infestation among primary school children in low- and middle-income countries: systematic review and meta-analysis.低、中收入国家小学生头虱感染的流行状况及相关因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 12;24(1):2181. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19712-2.
8
Supply kits for antenatal and childbirth care during antenatal care and delivery: a mixed-methods systematic review, the qualitative approach.产前护理和分娩期间的产前及分娩护理供应包:一项混合方法的系统评价,定性方法
Reprod Health. 2017 Mar 31;14(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0299-0.
9
Experiences of Birth Attendants on Upward Obstetric Emergency Referrals in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Protocol for a Scoping Review.中低收入国家接生人员向上转诊产科急症的经验:一项范围综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Apr 10;14:e64886. doi: 10.2196/64886.
10
Global prevalence of post-abortion depression: systematic review and Meta-analysis.全球流产后抑郁的患病率:系统评价和 Meta 分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Oct 26;23(1):786. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05278-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Associations between birth kit use and maternal and neonatal health outcomes in rural Jigawa state, Nigeria: A secondary analysis of data from a cluster randomized controlled trial.在尼日利亚吉加瓦州农村,使用产包与母婴健康结局的关联:一项基于群组随机对照试验数据的二次分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 26;13(12):e0208885. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208885. eCollection 2018.
2
A new improved graphical and quantitative method for detecting bias in meta-analysis.一种新的改进的图形和定量方法,用于检测荟萃分析中的偏倚。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2018 Dec;16(4):195-203. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000141.
3
Supply kits for antenatal and childbirth care: a systematic review.
产前和分娩护理供应包:系统评价。
Reprod Health. 2017 Dec 13;14(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0436-9.
4
Supply kits for antenatal and childbirth care during antenatal care and delivery: a mixed-methods systematic review, the qualitative approach.产前护理和分娩期间的产前及分娩护理供应包:一项混合方法的系统评价,定性方法
Reprod Health. 2017 Mar 31;14(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0299-0.
5
Umbilical cord-care practices in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.低收入和中等收入国家的脐带护理实践:一项系统综述
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Feb 20;17(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1250-7.
6
Impact of the Integration of Water Treatment, Hygiene, Nutrition, and Clean Delivery Interventions on Maternal Health Service Use.水处理、卫生、营养及清洁分娩干预措施整合对孕产妇保健服务利用的影响。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017 May;96(5):1253-1260. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0709. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
7
Newborn Care in the Home and Health Facility: Formative Findings for Intervention Research in Cambodia.柬埔寨家庭和医疗机构中的新生儿护理:干预研究的形成性研究结果
Healthcare (Basel). 2016 Dec 21;4(4):94. doi: 10.3390/healthcare4040094.
8
Feasibility and acceptability of clean birth kits containing misoprostol for self-administration to prevent postpartum hemorrhage in rural Papua New Guinea.在巴布亚新几内亚农村地区,含米索前列醇的清洁分娩包用于自我给药预防产后出血的可行性及可接受性。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Jun;133(3):301-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.10.018. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
9
What impact do essential newborn care practices have on neonatal mortality in low and lower-middle income countries? Evidence from Bangladesh.基本新生儿护理措施对低收入和中低收入国家的新生儿死亡率有何影响?来自孟加拉国的证据。
J Perinatol. 2016 Mar;36(3):225-30. doi: 10.1038/jp.2015.181. Epub 2015 Dec 3.
10
Surgical Neonatal Sepsis in Developing Countries.发展中国家的新生儿外科脓毒症
J Neonatal Surg. 2015 Oct 1;4(4):41. eCollection 2015 Oct-Dec.