• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

产前护理和分娩期间的产前及分娩护理供应包:一项混合方法的系统评价,定性方法

Supply kits for antenatal and childbirth care during antenatal care and delivery: a mixed-methods systematic review, the qualitative approach.

作者信息

Colomar Mercedes, Cafferata Maria Luisa, Aleman Alicia, Tomasso Giselle, Betran Ana Pilar

机构信息

Montevideo Clinical Research Unit (UNICEM), Montevideo, Uruguay.

World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Reprod Health. 2017 Mar 31;14(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0299-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12978-017-0299-0
PMID:28359337
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5374621/
Abstract

Antenatal care reduces maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity through the detection and treatment of some conditions, but its coverage is less than optimal within certain populations. Supply kits for maternal health were designed to overcome barriers present when providing care during pregnancy and childbirth particularly to women from underserved population.We conducted a mixed-methods systematic review on the use of supply kits. This manuscript presents the findings from qualitative studies that reported barriers, facilitators, and user's recommendation in the adoption and implementation of any type of kit designed to be used during pregnancy or childbirth.This review included eight studies, and seven were implemented in developing countries. Most studies assessed the implementation of clean delivery kits to be used during labour and delivery, and contributed to gain insights into factors that may hinder or foster the use of kits.Clean delivery kits were conceived to cope with barriers related mainly to access. The most important barrier identified were those related to the socio-cultural and the lack of knowledge dimension such as who held the decision-making authority in the household, as well as popular beliefs behind the idea that birth preparation could bring bad luck, may prevent clients from adhering to their use. In addition, financial constraints and limited understanding of the instructions of use were accessibility barriers found. On the other hand, once used, clean delivery kits for maternal health were accepted by women and health workers. Convenience, hygienic components, and avoidance of delays in receiving care were viewed as satisfactory features.Supply kits are mostly affordable and easily deployable. Increasing awareness among the population about the offered kits and providing information on their benefits emerges as a critical step to foster use in settings where kits are available. Implementation of this strategy requires low complexity resources and could make the use of kits an accepted alternative to increase the use of evidence-based interventions and thus improve quality of care during pregnancy, childbirth and neonatal period mainly at the community level in low income countries and remote areas with low access.

摘要

产前护理通过对某些病症的检测和治疗降低了孕产妇和围产期的死亡率及发病率,但其在某些人群中的覆盖范围并不理想。孕产妇保健供应包旨在克服在孕期和分娩期间提供护理时遇到的障碍,尤其是为服务不足人群中的妇女提供护理时。我们对供应包的使用进行了一项混合方法的系统评价。本手稿介绍了定性研究的结果,这些研究报告了在采用和实施任何旨在在孕期或分娩期间使用的供应包时存在的障碍、促进因素以及用户的建议。该评价纳入了八项研究,其中七项在发展中国家开展。大多数研究评估了分娩时使用的清洁分娩包的实施情况,并有助于深入了解可能阻碍或促进使用这些包的因素。清洁分娩包旨在应对主要与获取相关的障碍。确定的最重要障碍与社会文化和知识缺乏层面有关,例如家庭中的决策权威是谁,以及认为分娩准备会带来厄运背后的普遍观念,这些可能会阻止服务对象坚持使用。此外,经济限制和对使用说明的理解有限也是发现的获取障碍。另一方面,一旦使用,孕产妇保健清洁分娩包受到了妇女和卫生工作者的认可。便利性、卫生组件以及避免护理延误被视为令人满意的特点。供应包大多价格实惠且易于部署。提高人群对所提供包的认识并提供其益处的信息,成为在有供应包的环境中促进使用的关键一步。实施这一策略所需的资源复杂性较低,并且可以使供应包的使用成为一种被接受的选择,以增加基于证据的干预措施的使用,从而主要在低收入国家的社区层面和获取机会少的偏远地区改善孕期、分娩期和新生儿期的护理质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25b7/5374621/38ff8f0f3061/12978_2017_299_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25b7/5374621/38ff8f0f3061/12978_2017_299_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25b7/5374621/38ff8f0f3061/12978_2017_299_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Supply kits for antenatal and childbirth care during antenatal care and delivery: a mixed-methods systematic review, the qualitative approach.产前护理和分娩期间的产前及分娩护理供应包:一项混合方法的系统评价,定性方法
Reprod Health. 2017 Mar 31;14(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0299-0.
2
Factors that influence the provision of intrapartum and postnatal care by skilled birth attendants in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响低收入和中等收入国家熟练助产士提供产时和产后护理的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 17;11(11):CD011558. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011558.pub2.
3
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
4
Training and expertise in undertaking assisted vaginal delivery (AVD): a mixed methods systematic review of practitioners views and experiences.从事辅助阴道分娩(AVD)的培训和专业知识:从业者观点和经验的混合方法系统评价。
Reprod Health. 2021 May 5;18(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01146-3.
5
Antenatal corticosteroids for accelerating fetal lung maturation for women at risk of preterm birth.用于加速早产风险女性胎儿肺成熟的产前皮质类固醇。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 21;3(3):CD004454. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004454.pub3.
6
Supply kits for antenatal and childbirth care: a systematic review.产前和分娩护理供应包:系统评价。
Reprod Health. 2017 Dec 13;14(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0436-9.
7
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
8
Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section.减少不必要剖宫产的非临床干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 28;9(9):CD005528. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005528.pub3.
9
Antenatal and intrapartum interventions for preventing cerebral palsy: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews.预防脑瘫的产前和产时干预措施:Cochrane系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 8;8(8):CD012077. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012077.pub2.
10
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Clean delivery kit use in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.中低收入国家使用清洁接生包:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Nov 27;24(1):791. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06913-1.
2
Effectiveness of birthing kits for clean childbirth: a systematic review.分娩套件在清洁分娩中的效果:系统评价。
Int Health. 2020 Jan 1;12(1):3-10. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihz022.
3
Associations between birth kit use and maternal and neonatal health outcomes in rural Jigawa state, Nigeria: A secondary analysis of data from a cluster randomized controlled trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Barriers and facilitators to health care seeking behaviours in pregnancy in rural communities of southern Mozambique.莫桑比克南部农村社区孕期就医行为的障碍与促进因素
Reprod Health. 2016 Jun 8;13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12978-016-0141-0.
2
SOCIAL AND SOCIETAL BARRIERS IN UTILIZATION OF MATERNAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES IN RURAL PUNJAB, PAKISTAN.巴基斯坦旁遮普省农村地区孕产妇保健服务利用中的社会及社会层面障碍
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2015 Oct-Dec;27(4):843-9.
3
Challenges and opportunities for implementing evidence-based antenatal care in Mozambique: a qualitative study.
在尼日利亚吉加瓦州农村,使用产包与母婴健康结局的关联:一项基于群组随机对照试验数据的二次分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 26;13(12):e0208885. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208885. eCollection 2018.
4
Provision of medical supply kits to improve quality of antenatal care in Mozambique: a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial.向莫桑比克提供医疗供应包以改善产前护理质量:一项 stepped-wedge 集群随机试验。
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Jan;6(1):e57-e65. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30421-7.
5
Supply kits for antenatal and childbirth care: a systematic review.产前和分娩护理供应包:系统评价。
Reprod Health. 2017 Dec 13;14(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0436-9.
莫桑比克实施循证产前护理的挑战与机遇:一项定性研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Sep 2;15:200. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0625-x.
4
Barriers and facilitators to antenatal and delivery care in western Kenya: a qualitative study.肯尼亚西部产前和分娩护理的障碍与促进因素:一项定性研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Feb 13;15:26. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0453-z.
5
Facilitators and barriers to facility-based delivery in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis.低收入和中等收入国家基于医疗机构分娩的促进因素和障碍:一项定性证据综合分析
Reprod Health. 2014 Sep 19;11(1):71. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-11-71.
6
Lesotho's minimum PMTCT package: lessons learned for combating vertical HIV transmission using co-packaged medicines.莱索托的最低限度预防母婴传播综合方案:利用组合包装药品防治垂直传播艾滋病毒的经验教训。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2012 Dec 26;15(2):17326. doi: 10.7448/IAS.15.2.17326.
7
What affects Clean Delivery Kit utilization at birth in Nepal? A qualitative study.什么因素影响尼泊尔分娩时清洁分娩包的使用?一项定性研究。
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2015 Mar;27(2):NP1263-72. doi: 10.1177/1010539512458950. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
8
Learning lessons from a traditional midwifery workforce in western Kenya.从肯尼亚西部的传统助产士劳动力中吸取经验教训。
Midwifery. 2011 Jun;27(3):324-30. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2011.01.005. Epub 2011 Mar 30.
9
Community participation: lessons for maternal, newborn, and child health.社区参与:母婴和儿童健康的经验教训。
Lancet. 2008 Sep 13;372(9642):962-71. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61406-3.
10
Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews.系统评价中定性研究的主题综合方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 Jul 10;8:45. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-45.