• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用教育推广和经济激励措施,提高东南伦敦 2003-2011 年常规医疗实践对衣原体筛查的贡献。

Using educational outreach and a financial incentive to increase general practices' contribution to chlamydia screening in South-East London 2003-2011.

机构信息

Amersham Vale Practice, Waldron Health Centre, London SE14 6LD, United Kingdom.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2012 Sep 18;12:802. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-802.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-12-802
PMID:22984897
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3524034/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The London Boroughs of Lambeth and Southwark have high levels of sexually transmitted infections including Chlamydia trachomatis. Modelling studies suggest that reductions in the prevalence of chlamydia infection will require a high level of population screening coverage and positivity among those screened. General practice has a potentially important role to play in delivering these levels of coverage since large numbers (up to 60%) of young people visit their general practice every year but previous work suggests that there are barriers to delivering screening in this setting. The aim of this study was to evaluate an intervention to increase chlamydia screening in general practice within Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) of Lambeth and Southwark, a strategy combining financial incentives and supportive practice visits to raise awareness and solve problems.

METHODS

Data on age, gender, venue and chlamydia result for tests on under 25 s in Lambeth from 2003-11 was obtained from the National Chlamydia Screening Programme. We analysed the number and percentage of tests generated in general practice, and looked at the number of practices screening more than 10% of their practice cohort of 15-24 year olds, male/female ratio and positivity rates across other screening venues. We also looked at practices screening less than 10% and studied change over time. We compared data from Lambeth and Southwark with London and England. We also studied features of the level and type of educational and financial incentive interventions employed.

RESULTS

Chlamydia tests performed in general practice increased from 23 tests in 2003-4 to 4813 tests in 2010-11 in Lambeth. In Southwark they increased from 5 tests in 2003/04 to 4321 in 2010/11. In 2011, 44.6% of tests came from GPs in Lambeth and 46% from GP's in Southwark. In Lambeth 62.7% of practices tested more than 10% of their cohort and in Southwark this was 55.8%. In Lambeth, postivity rate in 2010/11 was 5.8% in men and 6.0% in women. In Southwark positivity rate was 3.9% in men and 5.3% in women. In 2003/04 13% tests in general practice (Lambeth) were from men, this increased to 25% in 2010/11. In Southwark this increased from 20% in 2003/04 to 27.6% in 2010/11. We compared the results with London and national data and showed significant differences between GP testing in Lambeth and Southwark, and GP testing in London and the rest of England.

CONCLUSIONS

General practices can be important potential providers of chlamydia tests.With a combination of sustained support, financial incentives and feedback on performance, general practice may be able to test a large percentage of 15-24 year olds. General practice is also a potentially important provider of chlamydia tests to young men.

摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e91/3524034/f21214e3d9c2/1471-2458-12-802-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e91/3524034/ba4f8a935574/1471-2458-12-802-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e91/3524034/ef27a289347f/1471-2458-12-802-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e91/3524034/efa363309090/1471-2458-12-802-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e91/3524034/6f1a1d22cafb/1471-2458-12-802-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e91/3524034/f21214e3d9c2/1471-2458-12-802-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e91/3524034/ba4f8a935574/1471-2458-12-802-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e91/3524034/ef27a289347f/1471-2458-12-802-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e91/3524034/efa363309090/1471-2458-12-802-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e91/3524034/6f1a1d22cafb/1471-2458-12-802-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e91/3524034/f21214e3d9c2/1471-2458-12-802-5.jpg

背景

伦敦兰贝斯和南华克区的性传播感染水平较高,包括沙眼衣原体。模型研究表明,要降低衣原体感染的流行率,需要高水平的人群筛查覆盖率和筛查阳性率。由于大量(高达 60%)年轻人每年都会去看全科医生,因此全科医生在提供这些覆盖率方面具有潜在的重要作用,但之前的研究表明,在这种环境下提供筛查存在障碍。本研究旨在评估一项在兰贝斯和南华克初级保健信托(PCT)中增加全科医生进行衣原体筛查的干预措施,该策略结合经济激励措施和支持性的实践访问,以提高认识和解决问题。

方法

从 2003-11 年全国衣原体筛查计划中获取兰贝斯 25 岁以下人群的年龄、性别、地点和衣原体检测结果数据。我们分析了在全科医生中进行的检测数量和百分比,并观察了筛查 15-24 岁人群超过 10%的实践数量、男女比例和其他筛查场所的阳性率。我们还观察了筛查不足 10%的实践,并研究了随时间的变化。我们将兰贝斯和南华克的数据与伦敦和英格兰的数据进行了比较。我们还研究了所采用的教育和经济激励措施的水平和类型的特征。

结果

兰贝斯的全科医生进行的衣原体检测从 2003-4 年的 23 次增加到 2010-11 年的 4813 次。南华克的检测次数从 2003/04 年的 5 次增加到 2010/11 年的 4321 次。2011 年,兰贝斯 44.6%的检测来自全科医生,南华克为 46%。兰贝斯有 62.7%的实践检测了超过 10%的队列,南华克为 55.8%。兰贝斯 2010/11 年的阳性率为男性 5.8%,女性 6.0%。南华克的阳性率为男性 3.9%,女性 5.3%。2003/04 年,全科医生进行的检测中有 13%(兰贝斯)来自男性,这一比例在 2010/11 年增加到 25%。南华克的这一比例从 2003/04 年的 20%增加到 2010/11 年的 27.6%。我们将结果与伦敦和全国数据进行了比较,结果表明兰贝斯和南华克的全科医生检测结果与伦敦和英格兰其他地区的全科医生检测结果存在显著差异。

结论

全科医生可以成为衣原体检测的重要潜在提供者。通过持续的支持、经济激励措施和绩效反馈,全科医生可能能够对大量 15-24 岁人群进行检测。全科医生也是为年轻男性提供衣原体检测的潜在重要提供者。

相似文献

1
Using educational outreach and a financial incentive to increase general practices' contribution to chlamydia screening in South-East London 2003-2011.利用教育推广和经济激励措施,提高东南伦敦 2003-2011 年常规医疗实践对衣原体筛查的贡献。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Sep 18;12:802. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-802.
2
Can preventive care activities in general practice be sustained when financial incentives and external audit plus feedback are removed? ACCEPt-able: a cluster randomised controlled trial protocol.当经济激励措施以及外部审计与反馈被取消后,全科医疗中的预防保健活动能否持续开展?可接受性:一项整群随机对照试验方案。
Implement Sci. 2016 Sep 13;11(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0489-0.
3
Incentive payments to general practitioners aimed at increasing opportunistic testing of young women for chlamydia: a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial.激励全科医生对年轻女性进行衣原体机会性检测的激励支付:一项试点整群随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2010 Feb 17;10:70. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-70.
4
Tools to overcome potential barriers to chlamydia screening in general practice: Qualitative evaluation of the implementation of a complex intervention.全科医疗中克服衣原体筛查潜在障碍的工具:一项复杂干预措施实施情况的定性评估
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Mar 22;17:33. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0430-2.
5
Exploring why a complex intervention piloted in general practices did not result in an increase in chlamydia screening and diagnosis: a qualitative evaluation using the fidelity of implementation model.探究在全科医疗中试行的一项复杂干预措施为何未导致衣原体筛查和诊断率上升:一项基于实施保真度模型的定性评估。
BMC Fam Pract. 2017 Mar 21;18(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0618-0.
6
Should young people be paid for getting tested? A national comparative study to evaluate patient financial incentives for chlamydia screening.年轻人接受衣原体筛查应该获得报酬吗?一项全国性的比较研究评估衣原体筛查的患者经济激励措施。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Apr 2;12:261. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-261.
7
Increasing chlamydia screening tests in general practice: a modified Zelen prospective Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial evaluating a complex intervention based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour.提高全科医学中的衣原体筛查测试:一项基于计划行为理论的复杂干预措施的改良 Zelen 前瞻性群组随机对照试验。
Sex Transm Infect. 2014 May;90(3):188-94. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2013-051029. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
8
The impact of removing financial incentives and/or audit and feedback on chlamydia testing in general practice: A cluster randomised controlled trial (ACCEPt-able).取消经济激励和/或审计与反馈对一般实践中衣原体检测的影响:一项整群随机对照试验(ACCEPt-able)。
PLoS Med. 2022 Jan 4;19(1):e1003858. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003858. eCollection 2022 Jan.
9
Internet testing for Chlamydia trachomatis in England, 2006 to 2010.英格兰 2006 年至 2010 年沙眼衣原体互联网检测。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Dec 19;12:1095. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1095.
10
Australian general practitioner chlamydia testing rates among young people.澳大利亚全科医生对年轻人进行衣原体检测的比率。
Med J Aust. 2011 Mar 7;194(5):249-52. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2011.tb02957.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The Organization of Outreach Work for Vulnerable Patients in General Practice during COVID-19: Results from the Cross-Sectional PRICOV-19 Study in 38 Countries.全科医学中 COVID-19 弱势患者外联工作的组织:38 个国家的 PRICOV-19 研究的横断面结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 10;20(4):3165. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043165.
2
The Linkages Between Reimbursement and Prevention: A Mixed-Methods Approach.报销与预防之间的联系:混合方法研究。
Front Public Health. 2021 Oct 27;9:750122. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.750122. eCollection 2021.
3
Community-Directed Bacterial Sexually Transmitted Infection Testing Interventions Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: Protocol for an E-Delphi Study in Toronto, Canada.

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of financial incentives on the quality of health care provided by primary care physicians.经济激励措施对初级保健医生所提供医疗服务质量的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Sep 7(9):CD008451. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008451.pub2.
2
Local opinion leaders: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.当地意见领袖:对专业实践和医疗保健结果的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Aug 10(8):CD000125. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000125.pub4.
3
Efficacy of interventions to increase the uptake of chlamydia screening in primary care: a systematic review.
男男性行为者中社区导向的细菌性性传播感染检测干预措施:加拿大多伦多一项电子德尔菲研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Jul 4;8(7):e13801. doi: 10.2196/13801.
4
Effectiveness of a Quality Improvement Intervention to Improve Rates of Routine Chlamydia Trachomatis Screening in Female Adolescents Seeking Primary Preventive Care.一项质量改进干预措施在提高寻求初级预防保健的女性青少年常规沙眼衣原体筛查率方面的有效性。
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2019 Feb;32(1):32-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2018.10.004. Epub 2018 Oct 28.
5
Qualitative interviews with healthcare staff in four European countries to inform adaptation of an intervention to increase chlamydia testing.对四个欧洲国家的医护人员进行定性访谈,以指导一项旨在增加衣原体检测的干预措施的调整。
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 25;7(9):e017528. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017528.
6
Exploring why a complex intervention piloted in general practices did not result in an increase in chlamydia screening and diagnosis: a qualitative evaluation using the fidelity of implementation model.探究在全科医疗中试行的一项复杂干预措施为何未导致衣原体筛查和诊断率上升:一项基于实施保真度模型的定性评估。
BMC Fam Pract. 2017 Mar 21;18(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0618-0.
7
Service evaluation of an educational intervention to improve sexual health services in primary care implemented using a step-wedge design: analysis of chlamydia testing and diagnosis rate changes.采用阶梯楔形设计实施的改善初级保健中性健康服务的教育干预措施的服务评估:衣原体检测和诊断率变化分析
BMC Public Health. 2016 Aug 2;16:686. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3343-z.
8
Increased Gonorrhea Screening and Case Finding After Implementation of Expanded Screening Criteria-Urban Indian Health Service Facility in Phoenix, Arizona, 2011-2013.2011 - 2013年,亚利桑那州凤凰城的城市印第安人健康服务机构实施扩大筛查标准后淋病筛查及病例发现情况增加
Sex Transm Dis. 2016 Jun;43(6):396-401. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000457.
9
Interventions to Improve Sexually Transmitted Disease Screening in Clinic-Based Settings.改善基于门诊环境的性传播疾病筛查的干预措施。
Sex Transm Dis. 2016 Feb;43(2 Suppl 1):S28-41. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000294.
10
Infection: Screening and Management.感染:筛查与管理。
J Clin Outcomes Manag. 2014 Jan;21(1):30-38.
干预措施提高初级保健中衣原体筛查率的效果:系统评价。
BMC Infect Dis. 2011 Aug 5;11:211. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-11-211.
4
"...they should be offering it": a qualitative study to investigate young peoples' attitudes towards chlamydia screening in GP surgeries.“他们应该提供这种服务”:一项定性研究调查年轻人对全科医生诊所进行衣原体筛查的态度。
BMC Public Health. 2010 Oct 18;10:616. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-616.
5
Computer reminders for Chlamydia screening in general practice: a randomized controlled trial.计算机提醒在一般实践中进行衣原体筛查:一项随机对照试验。
Sex Transm Dis. 2010 Jul;37(7):445-50. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181cfcb4c.
6
Incentive payments to general practitioners aimed at increasing opportunistic testing of young women for chlamydia: a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial.激励全科医生对年轻女性进行衣原体机会性检测的激励支付:一项试点整群随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2010 Feb 17;10:70. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-70.
7
Where do young Irish women want Chlamydia-screening services to be set up? A qualitative study employing Goffman's impression management framework.爱尔兰年轻女性希望在哪里设立衣原体筛查服务?一项运用戈夫曼印象管理框架的定性研究。
Health Place. 2010 Jan;16(1):16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.07.003. Epub 2009 Aug 20.
8
A study of young peoples' attitudes to opportunistic Chlamydia testing in UK general practice.一项关于英国全科医疗中年轻人对衣原体机会性检测态度的研究。
Reprod Health. 2008 Dec 19;5:11. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-5-11.
9
Interactive workshops increase chlamydia testing in primary care--a controlled study.互动式工作坊可提高基层医疗中衣原体检测率——一项对照研究。
Fam Pract. 2008 Aug;25(4):279-86. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmn032. Epub 2008 Jun 25.
10
Take the sex out of STI screening! Views of young women on implementing chlamydia screening in General Practice.去除性传播感染筛查中的性别因素!年轻女性对在全科医疗中开展衣原体筛查的看法。
BMC Infect Dis. 2008 May 9;8:62. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-8-62.