Suppr超能文献

年轻人接受衣原体筛查应该获得报酬吗?一项全国性的比较研究评估衣原体筛查的患者经济激励措施。

Should young people be paid for getting tested? A national comparative study to evaluate patient financial incentives for chlamydia screening.

机构信息

Health Protection Agency, Centre for Infections, London, UK.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2012 Apr 2;12:261. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-261.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient financial incentives ("incentives") have been widely used to promote chlamydia screening uptake amongst 15-24 year olds in England, but there is scarce evidence of their effectiveness. The objectives of the study were to describe incentives used to promote chlamydia screening in Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) in England and to evaluate their impact on coverage and positivity rate.

METHODS

PCTs that had used incentives between 1/1/2007 and 30/6/2009 (exposed) were matched by socio-demographic profile and initial screening coverage with PCTs that had not (unexposed). For each PCT, percentage point change in chlamydia screening coverage and positivity for the period before and during the incentive was calculated. Differences in average change of coverage and positivity rate between exposed and unexposed PCTs were compared using linear regression to adjust for matching and potential confounders.

RESULTS

Incentives had a significant effect in increasing average coverage in exposed PCTs (0.43%, CI 0.04%-0.82%). The effect for voucher schemes (2.35%) was larger than for prize draws (0.16%). The difference was greater in females (0.73%) than males (0.14%). The effect on positivity rates was not significant (0.07%, CI -1.53% to 1.67%).

CONCLUSIONS

Vouchers, but not prize draws, led to a small absolute but large relative increase in chlamydia screening coverage. Incentives increased coverage more in females than males but had no impact on reported positivity rates. These findings support recommendations not to use prize draws to promote chlamydia screening and contribute to the evidence base of the operational effectiveness of using patient incentives in encouraging public health action.

摘要

背景

在英格兰,为了提高 15-24 岁人群的衣原体筛查率,广泛采用了患者经济激励措施(“激励措施”),但激励措施有效性的证据很少。本研究的目的是描述在英格兰的初级保健信托基金(PCT)中用于促进衣原体筛查的激励措施,并评估其对覆盖率和阳性率的影响。

方法

将在 2007 年 1 月 1 日至 2009 年 6 月 30 日期间(暴露组)使用激励措施的 PCT 与未使用激励措施的 PCT(非暴露组)按社会人口统计学特征和初始筛查覆盖率进行匹配。对于每个 PCT,计算激励措施实施前后衣原体筛查覆盖率和阳性率的百分点变化。使用线性回归比较暴露组和非暴露组之间覆盖率和阳性率平均变化的差异,以调整匹配和潜在混杂因素。

结果

激励措施对增加暴露组的平均覆盖率有显著影响(0.43%,CI 0.04%-0.82%)。代金券计划(2.35%)的效果大于抽奖(0.16%)。女性(0.73%)的效果大于男性(0.14%)。对阳性率的影响不显著(0.07%,CI-1.53%至 1.67%)。

结论

代金券而非抽奖导致衣原体筛查覆盖率的绝对增加很小,但相对增加很大。激励措施对女性的覆盖率增加大于男性,但对报告的阳性率没有影响。这些发现支持不使用抽奖来促进衣原体筛查的建议,并为使用患者激励措施鼓励公共卫生行动的操作有效性的证据基础做出贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20b6/3350390/46455fe7d1fa/1471-2458-12-261-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验