• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本献血不良反应调查问卷分析

Analysis of a questionnaire on adverse reactions to blood donation in Japan.

作者信息

Inaba S, Takanashi M, Matsuzaki K, Ono Y, Nakajima K, Shibata R, Tadokoro K, Ishikawa Y, Kinukawa N

机构信息

Japanese Red Cross, Kanagawa Blood Center, Tokyo Metropolitan Blood Center, Headquarters of the Japan Blood Center, Central Blood Research Institute, Information Service of Kyushu University Hospital, Japan.

出版信息

Transfus Apher Sci. 2013 Feb;48(1):21-34. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2012.07.012. Epub 2012 Sep 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.transci.2012.07.012
PMID:22985534
Abstract

In 2007, the Japanese Red Cross Blood Center performed a large-scale questionnaire study of post-donation adverse reactions. The questionnaire was distributed to 98,389 donors, and the answers were returned by 55,231 (56.1%). In total, 2,877 (5.2%) complained of an adverse reaction. Assuming that there were no adverse reactions for the 46,150 donors who did not reply, the rate of adverse reaction can be speculated to be 2.8%. Our study strongly suggests that blood centers have long underestimated the risks of vaso-vagal reactions. Taking at least 6h of careful rest after donation would be a helpful counter measure.

摘要

2007年,日本红十字血液中心针对献血后不良反应开展了一项大规模问卷调查研究。问卷发放给了98389名献血者,回收了55231份答卷(回收率56.1%)。总共有2877人(5.2%)主诉有不良反应。假设未回复问卷的46150名献血者没有出现不良反应,那么推测的不良反应发生率为2.8%。我们的研究有力地表明,血液中心长期以来低估了血管迷走神经反应的风险。献血后至少进行6小时的精心休息将是一种有效的应对措施。

相似文献

1
Analysis of a questionnaire on adverse reactions to blood donation in Japan.日本献血不良反应调查问卷分析
Transfus Apher Sci. 2013 Feb;48(1):21-34. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2012.07.012. Epub 2012 Sep 15.
2
The influence of adverse reactions, subjective distress, and anxiety on retention of first-time blood donors.不良反应、主观不适和焦虑对初次献血者保留率的影响。
Transfusion. 2013 Feb;53(2):337-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03810.x. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
3
Blood donors--Serious adverse reactions (SAR) 2010-2014 EFS Châteauroux, France.献血者——2010 - 2014年严重不良反应(SAR),法国沙托鲁埃夫斯血液中心
Transfus Clin Biol. 2015 Jun;22(2):62-5. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2015.04.002. Epub 2015 May 18.
4
Vasovagal reactions in blood donors during or immediately after blood donation.献血者在献血期间或献血后立即出现的血管迷走神经反应。
Transfus Med. 2005 Oct;15(5):389-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3148.2005.00600.x.
5
First-time whole blood donation: A critical step for donor safety and retention on first three donations.首次全血捐献:保障献血者安全及维持其头三次献血的关键一步。
Transfus Clin Biol. 2015 Oct-Dec;22(5-6):312-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2015.09.002. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
6
Donation related fears predict vasovagal reactions and donor attrition among high school donors.捐赠相关的恐惧预测了高中生供者中的血管迷走性反应和供者流失。
Transfusion. 2021 Jan;61(1):102-107. doi: 10.1111/trf.16099. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
7
How afraid are you of having blood drawn from your arm? A simple fear question predicts vasovagal reactions without causing them among high school donors.你有多害怕从手臂抽血?一个简单的恐惧问题可以预测高中献血者的血管迷走神经反应,而不会引起这些反应。
Transfusion. 2013 Feb;53(2):315-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03726.x. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
8
Donors who react may not come back: analysis of repeat donation as a function of phlebotomist ratings of vasovagal reactions.有反应的献血者可能不会再来献血:将重复献血作为静脉穿刺采血人员对血管迷走神经反应评分的函数进行分析。
Transfus Apher Sci. 2005 Oct;33(2):99-106. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2005.02.005.
9
Do reactions after whole blood donation predict syncope on return donation?全血捐献后反应能否预测再次捐献时发生晕厥?
Transfusion. 2012 Dec;52(12):2570-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03666.x. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
10
Adverse reactions, psychological factors, and their effect on donor retention in men and women.不良反应、心理因素及其对男女供者保留率的影响。
Transfusion. 2012 Sep;52(9):1871-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03551.x. Epub 2012 Feb 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk factors for vasovagal reactions in blood donors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.献血者血管迷走神经反应的危险因素:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Transfusion. 2025 Jan;65(1):211-223. doi: 10.1111/trf.18078. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
2
The non-haemorrhagic vagal response to trauma: a review of hypotensive and bradycardic responses to injury in the absence of bleeding.创伤性非出血性迷走神经反应:无出血情况下损伤导致的低血压和心动过缓反应综述。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Oct;50(5):1995-2004. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02648-y. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
3
Adverse Reactions and Complication in Voluntary Blood Donors.
无偿献血者的不良反应与并发症
Mater Sociomed. 2023;35(2):98-102. doi: 10.5455/msm.2023.35.98-102.
4
Donor tolerability of convalescent plasma donation.供者接受恢复期血浆捐献的耐受性。
J Clin Apher. 2021 Jun;36(3):429-436. doi: 10.1002/jca.21882. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
5
Adverse Reactions in Allogeneic Blood Donors: A Tertiary Care Experience from a Developing Country.异体献血者的不良反应:来自一个发展中国家的三级医疗经验。
Oman Med J. 2016 Mar;31(2):124-8. doi: 10.5001/omj.2016.24.
6
Which is the best schedule of autologous blood storage for preoperative adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients?对于术前青少年特发性脊柱侧弯患者,最佳的自体血储存方案是什么?
Scoliosis. 2015 Feb 11;10(Suppl 2):S11. doi: 10.1186/1748-7161-10-S2-S11. eCollection 2015.