Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Innsbruck Medical University Hospital, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Resuscitation. 2013 Apr;84(4):492-5. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.09.010. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
In the European Alps emergency medical helicopter services are regularly involved in avalanche rescue missions. How the helicopter emergency medical system best supports avalanche rescue missions is controversial.
To study advantages and limitations of the early dispatch of emergency medical helicopters after avalanche accidents.
Data on rescue mission characteristics and patterns and severity of medical emergencies were obtained for 221 helicopter avalanche rescue missions performed in the Austrian province of Tyrol between October 2008 and June 2011.
A buried avalanche victim had to be searched for in only 12 (5.5%) of the 221 rescue missions, whereas medical emergencies were encountered at the scene in 24 missions (11%). Survival rate for totally buried victims extricated after helicopter arrival was significantly lower than for victims extricated before helicopter arrival (19% versus 74%, p=0.0002). In 124 missions (56%) no victim was present at the scene when the helicopter arrived. Medical emergencies involved normothermic cardiac arrest (n=11), severe accidental hypothermia (n=6), critical trauma (n=7) and hypothermia combined with critical trauma (n=1). Survival rate at hospital discharge was 27% for arrested normothermic patients and 50% for trauma and hypothermia patients.
Medical emergencies are encountered at avalanche scenes twice as often as there is need to search for totally buried victims, clearly supporting the immediate dispatch of medical crew members to the accident site. The high rate of emergency medical helicopter operations to avalanche incidents where no victim is injured or buried may be characteristic for densely populated mountainous regions and can be reduced by a restrictive dispatch policy after avalanche accidents without clear information about human involvement.
在欧洲阿尔卑斯山,紧急医疗直升机服务经常参与雪崩救援任务。直升机紧急医疗系统如何最好地支持雪崩救援任务存在争议。
研究雪崩事故后紧急医疗直升机早期出动的优势和局限性。
获取 2008 年 10 月至 2011 年 6 月在奥地利蒂罗尔省进行的 221 次直升机雪崩救援任务的救援任务特征和模式以及医疗紧急情况的严重程度的数据。
在 221 次救援任务中,仅在 12 次(5.5%)中需要搜索被埋在雪崩下的受害者,而在 24 次(11%)中在现场遇到了医疗紧急情况。在直升机到达后从直升机救出的完全被埋受害者的存活率明显低于在直升机到达前救出的受害者(19%对 74%,p=0.0002)。在 124 次(56%)任务中,直升机到达时现场没有受害者。医疗紧急情况涉及正常体温心脏骤停(n=11)、严重意外低温(n=6)、严重创伤(n=7)和低温合并严重创伤(n=1)。在医院出院时,正常体温心脏骤停患者的存活率为 27%,创伤和低温患者的存活率为 50%。
在雪崩现场遇到医疗紧急情况的频率是需要搜索完全被埋受害者的两倍,这显然支持立即向事故现场派遣医疗人员。在没有明确涉及人员的雪崩事故中,紧急医疗直升机操作到雪崩事件的频率很高,可能是人口稠密的山区的特征,可以通过在雪崩事故后实施限制调度政策来减少,而无需有关人员参与的明确信息。