• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同导航系统辅助下下颈椎椎弓根螺钉置钉准确性的研究:一项人体尸体研究。

Accuracy of lower cervical pedicle screw placement with assistance of distinct navigation systems: a human cadaveric study.

机构信息

Department of Spine Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital (4th Clinical Medical College of Peking University), No. 31, Xinjiekou East Street, Xicheng District, 100035 Beijing, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2013 Jan;22(1):148-55. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2494-6. Epub 2012 Sep 18.

DOI:10.1007/s00586-012-2494-6
PMID:22987158
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3540299/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Evaluate the accuracy of five different techniques for lower cervical pedicle screw placement.

METHODS

Forty human cadaveric cervical spines were equally divided into five groups, and each group had eight specimens. Pedicle screws with dia. 3.5 mm were used. Group 1 was blind screw placement without any assistance; Group 2-5 was assisted by the X-ray fluoroscopy, virtual fluoroscopy navigation system, CT-based navigation system, and Iso-C 3D navigation system, respectively. Thereafter, cortical integrity of each pedicle was evaluated by anatomic dissection of the specimens.

RESULTS

A total of 398 pedicle screws were inserted. In the Group 1-5, the average operation time per sample was 27 ± 3.0, 112 ± 10.3, 69 ± 6.4, 98 ± 11.0, and 91 ± 6.0 min, respectively. The outcome for excellent, fair and poor were 29 (36.3 %), 21 (26.2 %) and 30 (37.5 %) in Group 1; 35 (44.9 %), 29 (37.2 %) and 14 (17.9 %) in Group 2; 34 (42.5 %), 36 (45.0 %) and 10 (12.5 %) in Group 3; 70 (87.5 %), 10 (12.5 %) and 0 (0.0 %) in Group 4; 72 (90.0 %), 8 (10.0 %) and 0 (0.0 %) in Group 5.

CONCLUSIONS

Blind screw placement was surely unsafe. Lower cervical pedicle screw placement assisted by the CT-based navigation system or the Iso-C 3D navigation system significantly improved the accuracy compared to the fluoroscopy assistance and the virtual fluoroscopy navigation assistance.

摘要

目的

评估五种不同技术在下颈椎椎弓根螺钉置入中的准确性。

方法

将 40 具人尸体颈椎标本等分为 5 组,每组 8 例。使用直径为 3.5mm 的椎弓根螺钉。第 1 组为盲置螺钉,不使用任何辅助手段;第 2-5 组分别采用 X 射线透视、虚拟透视导航系统、基于 CT 的导航系统和 Iso-C 3D 导航系统辅助。然后,通过对标本进行解剖学解剖来评估每个椎弓根的皮质完整性。

结果

共置入 398 枚椎弓根螺钉。在第 1-5 组中,每组样本的平均手术时间分别为 27 ± 3.0、112 ± 10.3、69 ± 6.4、98 ± 11.0 和 91 ± 6.0min。第 1 组的优秀、良好和差的结果分别为 29(36.3%)、21(26.2%)和 30(37.5%);第 2 组分别为 35(44.9%)、29(37.2%)和 14(17.9%);第 3 组分别为 34(42.5%)、36(45.0%)和 10(12.5%);第 4 组分别为 70(87.5%)、10(12.5%)和 0(0.0%);第 5 组分别为 72(90.0%)、8(10.0%)和 0(0.0%)。

结论

盲目螺钉置入肯定不安全。与透视辅助和虚拟透视导航辅助相比,基于 CT 的导航系统或 Iso-C 3D 导航系统辅助下的下颈椎椎弓根螺钉置入可显著提高准确性。

相似文献

1
Accuracy of lower cervical pedicle screw placement with assistance of distinct navigation systems: a human cadaveric study.不同导航系统辅助下下颈椎椎弓根螺钉置钉准确性的研究:一项人体尸体研究。
Eur Spine J. 2013 Jan;22(1):148-55. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2494-6. Epub 2012 Sep 18.
2
Comparison of the clinical accuracy of cervical (C2-C7) pedicle screw insertion assisted by fluoroscopy, computed tomography-based navigation, and intraoperative three-dimensional C-arm navigation.比较透视辅助、基于计算机断层扫描的导航和术中三维 C 臂导航辅助下颈椎(C2-C7)椎弓根螺钉置入的临床准确性。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2010 Nov;123(21):2995-8.
3
Accuracy of cervical pedicle screw placement with four different designs of rapid prototyping navigation templates: a human cadaveric study.四种不同设计的快速成型导航模板在颈椎椎弓根螺钉置钉中的准确性:一项人体尸体研究。
Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon). 2021 Dec;26(1):49-57. doi: 10.1080/24699322.2021.1919210.
4
Placement of pedicle screws in the human cadaveric cervical spine: comparative accuracy of three techniques.人体尸体颈椎椎弓根螺钉置入:三种技术的比较准确性
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Jul 1;25(13):1655-67. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200007010-00009.
5
[Accuracy of CT-based navigation of pedicle screws implantation in the cervical spine compared with X-ray fluoroscopy technique].[基于CT的颈椎椎弓根螺钉植入导航与X线透视技术的准确性比较]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2005 Oct 15;43(20):1328-30.
6
Application of a novel 3D drill template for cervical pedicle screw tunnel design: a cadaveric study.一种用于颈椎椎弓根螺钉隧道设计的新型三维钻孔模板的应用:一项尸体研究。
Eur Spine J. 2017 Sep;26(9):2348-2356. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5118-3. Epub 2017 Jun 10.
7
Image-guided spine surgery: a cadaver study comparing conventional open laminoforaminotomy and two image-guided techniques for pedicle screw placement in posterolateral fusion and nonfusion models.影像引导下的脊柱手术:一项尸体研究,比较传统开放性椎板间孔切开术与两种影像引导技术在腰椎后路融合及非融合模型中椎弓根螺钉置入的效果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Nov 15;27(22):2503-8. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000031274.34509.1E.
8
Accuracy of fluoroscopy versus computer-assisted navigation for the placement of anterior cervical pedicle screws.透视引导与计算机辅助导航用于颈椎前路椎弓根螺钉置入的准确性比较
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Apr 1;40(7):E404-10. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000786.
9
Surgical safety of cervical pedicle screw placement with computer navigation system.计算机导航系统辅助颈椎椎弓根螺钉置入的手术安全性
Neurosurg Rev. 2017 Apr;40(2):251-258. doi: 10.1007/s10143-016-0757-0. Epub 2016 May 31.
10
Intraoperative, full-rotation, three-dimensional image (O-arm)-based navigation system for cervical pedicle screw insertion.基于术中全旋转三维图像(O 臂)的颈椎椎弓根螺钉置入导航系统。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Nov;15(5):472-8. doi: 10.3171/2011.6.SPINE10809. Epub 2011 Jul 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Radiological studies for the best position and trajectory of the anterior cervical pedicle screw in the lower cervical spine in normal populations.正常人群下颈椎前路颈椎椎弓根螺钉最佳置入位置和轨迹的影像学研究。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 Aug 1;15(8):6811-6821. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-1971. Epub 2025 Jul 29.
2
Robot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in thoracolumbar burst fractures: a comparative study.机器人辅助经皮椎弓根螺钉固定治疗胸腰椎爆裂骨折:一项对比研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):23175. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-05081-2.
3
Robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-assisted kyphoplasty in treatment of severe osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in the old patients: a retrospective study : Robot-assisted in treatment of severe OVCF.机器人辅助与透视辅助椎体后凸成形术治疗老年严重骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折:一项回顾性研究:机器人辅助治疗严重骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Apr 2;26(1):322. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08564-5.
4
Robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw fixation of thoracolumbar compression fractures.机器人辅助与透视引导胸椎腰椎压缩性骨折椎弓根螺钉固定。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Dec 1;102(48):e36430. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036430.
5
Elastic Image Fusion Software to Coregister Preoperatively Planned Pedicle Screws With Intraoperative Computed Tomography Data for Image-Guided Spinal Surgery.用于图像引导脊柱手术的弹性图像融合软件,将术前规划的椎弓根螺钉与术中计算机断层扫描数据进行配准。
Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Apr;15(2):295-301. doi: 10.14444/8039. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
6
Intraoperative image guidance for cervical spine surgery.颈椎手术的术中影像引导
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Jan;9(1):93. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-1101.
7
Comparison of Accuracy and Clinical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Pedicle Screw Placement in Posterior Cervical Surgery.机器人辅助与透视引导下颈椎后路椎弓根螺钉置入的准确性及临床结果比较
Global Spine J. 2022 May;12(4):620-626. doi: 10.1177/2192568220960406. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
8
Radiological and Clinical Differences between Tinavi Orthopedic Robot and O-Arm Navigation System in Thoracolumbar Screw Implantation for Reconstruction of Spinal Stability.经胸腰椎螺钉置入重建脊柱稳定性中,Tinavi 骨科机器人与 O 臂导航系统的放射学和临床差异。
Med Sci Monit. 2020 Sep 12;26:e924770. doi: 10.12659/MSM.924770.
9
A Comparative Study of C2 Pedicle or Pars Screw Placement with Assistance from a 3-Dimensional (3D)-Printed Navigation Template versus C-Arm Based Navigation.C2 椎弓根或 pars 螺钉置钉的三维打印导航模板辅助与 C 臂导航的对比研究
Med Sci Monit. 2019 Dec 26;25:9981-9990. doi: 10.12659/MSM.918440.
10
Guideline for Thoracolumbar Pedicle Screw Placement Assisted by Orthopaedic Surgical Robot.骨科手术机器人辅助胸腰椎椎弓根螺钉置钉指南。
Orthop Surg. 2019 Apr;11(2):153-159. doi: 10.1111/os.12453.

本文引用的文献

1
Posterior fixation and fusion of unstable Hangman's fracture by using intraoperative three-dimensional fluoroscopy-based navigation.采用术中基于三维荧光透视导航的不稳定 Hangman 骨折后路固定融合术。
Eur Spine J. 2012 May;21(5):863-71. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-2085-y. Epub 2011 Nov 23.
2
Placement of pedicle screws using three-dimensional fluoroscopy-based navigation in lumbar vertebrae with axial rotation.在伴有轴向旋转的腰椎中使用基于三维荧光透视导航技术置入椎弓根螺钉。
Eur Spine J. 2010 Nov;19(11):1928-35. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1564-x. Epub 2010 Sep 6.
3
Pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine: a comparison study of computer-assisted navigation and conventional techniques.胸椎椎弓根螺钉置入:计算机辅助导航与传统技术的比较研究
Orthopedics. 2010 Aug 11;33(8). doi: 10.3928/01477447-20100625-14.
4
Load sharing properties of cervical pedicle screw-rod constructs versus lateral mass screw-rod constructs.颈椎椎弓根螺钉-棒结构与侧块螺钉-棒结构的载荷分担特性。
Eur Spine J. 2010 May;19(5):803-8. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1278-0. Epub 2010 Feb 2.
5
Functional outcome of computer-assisted spinal pedicle screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 23 studies including 5,992 pedicle screws.计算机辅助脊柱椎弓根螺钉置钉的功能结果:包含 5992 枚椎弓根螺钉的 23 项研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Spine J. 2010 Mar;19(3):370-5. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1258-4. Epub 2010 Jan 6.
6
Cervical pedicle screw insertion using a computed tomography cutout technique.颈椎椎弓根螺钉置入术采用计算机断层扫描切迹技术。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2009 Dec;11(6):681-7. doi: 10.3171/2009.6.SPINE09352.
7
Image-guided spine surgery: state of the art and future directions.影像引导脊柱手术:现状与未来方向。
Eur Spine J. 2010 Jan;19(1):25-45. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1091-9. Epub 2009 Sep 11.
8
Radiation exposure from musculoskeletal computerized tomographic scans.肌肉骨骼计算机断层扫描的辐射暴露
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Aug;91(8):1882-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01199.
9
Placement and complications of cervical pedicle screws in 144 cervical trauma patients using pedicle axis view techniques by fluoroscope.144例颈椎创伤患者采用荧光透视下椎弓根轴线视图技术置入颈椎椎弓根螺钉及其并发症
Eur Spine J. 2009 Sep;18(9):1293-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1032-7. Epub 2009 Jun 2.
10
Biomechanical pullout strength and stability of the cervical artificial pedicle screw.颈椎人工椎弓根螺钉的生物力学拔出强度及稳定性
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Jan 1;34(1):E16-20. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181891772.