• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估海地农村家庭饮用水氯化对健康的持续影响。

Evaluating the sustained health impact of household chlorination of drinking water in rural Haiti.

出版信息

Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012 Nov;87(5):786-795. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.12-0010. Epub 2012 Sep 17.

DOI:10.4269/ajtmh.2012.12-0010
PMID:22987657
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3516252/
Abstract

The Jolivert Safe Water for Families program has sold sodium hypochlorite solution (chlorine) and conducted household visits in rural Haiti since 2002. To assess the impact of the program on diarrheal disease, in 2010 we conducted a survey and water quality testing in 201 program participants and 425 control households selected at random. Fifty-six percent of participants (versus 10% of controls) had free chlorine residuals between 0.2 and 2.0 mg/L, indicating correct water treatment. Using intention-to-treat analysis, we found that significantly fewer children < 5 in participant households had an episode of diarrhea in the previous 48 hours (32% versus 52%; P < 0.001) with 59% reduced odds (odds ratio = 0.41, 95% confidence interval = 0.21-0.79). Treatment-on-treated estimates of the odds of diarrhea indicated larger program effects for participants who met more stringent verifications of participation. Diarrheal disease reduction in this long-term program was comparable with that seen in short-term randomized, controlled interventions, suggesting that household chlorination can be an effective long-term water treatment strategy.

摘要

自 2002 年以来,Jolivert 安全家庭用水计划一直在海地农村地区销售次氯酸钠溶液(氯)并进行家访。为了评估该计划对腹泻病的影响,我们于 2010 年在 201 名参与者和 425 名随机选择的对照组家庭中进行了调查和水质测试。56%的参与者(而对照组为 10%)的游离氯残留量在 0.2 至 2.0mg/L 之间,表明水处理正确。采用意向治疗分析,我们发现参与者家庭中 5 岁以下儿童在前 48 小时内腹泻发作的比例明显较低(32%对 52%;P<0.001),腹泻的几率降低了 59%(比值比=0.41,95%置信区间=0.21-0.79)。对符合更严格参与验证的参与者进行治疗效果评估表明,该计划对腹泻的影响更大。在这个长期计划中,腹泻病的减少与短期随机对照干预中观察到的减少相当,这表明家庭氯化可以成为一种有效的长期水处理策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca5b/3516252/bcce9c52e169/tropmed-87-786-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca5b/3516252/bfa545efcdc4/tropmed-87-786-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca5b/3516252/bcce9c52e169/tropmed-87-786-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca5b/3516252/bfa545efcdc4/tropmed-87-786-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca5b/3516252/bcce9c52e169/tropmed-87-786-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating the sustained health impact of household chlorination of drinking water in rural Haiti.评估海地农村家庭饮用水氯化对健康的持续影响。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012 Nov;87(5):786-795. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.12-0010. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
2
Effect of household water treatment with chlorine on diarrhea among children under the age of five years in rural areas of Dire Dawa, eastern Ethiopia: a cluster randomized controlled trial.埃塞俄比亚迪雷达瓦农村地区使用氯进行家庭水处理对五岁以下儿童腹泻的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
Infect Dis Poverty. 2020 Jun 8;9(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s40249-020-00680-9.
3
Effective use of household water treatment and safe storage in response to the 2010 Haiti earthquake.针对 2010 年海地地震,有效利用家庭水处理和安全储存。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2013 Sep;89(3):426-33. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.13-0179. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
4
Optimizing Household Chlorination Marketing Strategies: A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effect of Price and Promotion on Adoption in Haiti.优化家庭氯化消毒产品营销策略:一项关于价格和促销对海地采用率影响的随机对照试验
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017 Jul;97(1):271-280. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0820.
5
Household water chlorination reduces incidence of diarrhea among under-five children in rural Ethiopia: a cluster randomized controlled trial.家庭用水氯化处理可降低埃塞俄比亚农村地区五岁以下儿童腹泻发病率:一项整群随机对照试验
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 23;8(10):e77887. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077887. eCollection 2013.
6
Effects of source- versus household contamination of tubewell water on child diarrhea in rural Bangladesh: a randomized controlled trial.孟加拉国农村地区管井水的水源污染与家庭污染对儿童腹泻的影响:一项随机对照试验
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 27;10(3):e0121907. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121907. eCollection 2015.
7
Household effectiveness vs. laboratory efficacy of point-of-use chlorination.家庭使用点氯化消毒的实际效果与实验室效能对比
Water Res. 2014 May 1;54:69-77. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.01.037. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
8
Effect of home-based water chlorination and safe storage on diarrhea among persons with human immunodeficiency virus in Uganda.乌干达家庭式水氯化处理及安全储存对艾滋病毒感染者腹泻的影响
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005 Nov;73(5):926-33.
9
Effect of in-line drinking water chlorination at the point of collection on child diarrhoea in urban Bangladesh: a double-blind, cluster-randomised controlled trial.收集点直饮水氯化对孟加拉国城市儿童腹泻的影响:一项双盲、整群随机对照试验。
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Sep;7(9):e1247-e1256. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30315-8.
10
A randomized controlled trial of household-based flocculant-disinfectant drinking water treatment for diarrhea prevention in rural Guatemala.危地马拉农村地区基于家庭的絮凝剂-消毒剂饮用水处理预防腹泻的随机对照试验。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003 Oct;69(4):411-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic re-review of WASH trials to assess women's engagement in intervention delivery and research activities.对水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)试验进行系统性重新审查,以评估女性参与干预措施实施和研究活动的情况。
Nat Water. 2024;2(9):827-836. doi: 10.1038/s44221-024-00299-2. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
2
Comment on "Adoption of Point-of-Use Chlorination for Household Drinking Water Treatment: A Systematic Review".对《采用家庭饮用水处理的现场氯化法:系统评价》的评论
Environ Health Perspect. 2023 Sep;131(9):98002. doi: 10.1289/EHP13164. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
3
Interventions promoting uptake of water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) technologies in low- and middle-income countries: An evidence and gap map of effectiveness studies.

本文引用的文献

1
Estimating the scope of household water treatment in low- and medium-income countries.估算中低收入国家家庭水处理的范围。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010 Feb;82(2):289-300. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.09-0382.
2
Household water treatment in developing countries: comparing different intervention types using meta-regression.发展中国家的家庭水处理:使用荟萃回归比较不同干预类型。
Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Dec 1;43(23):8991-7. doi: 10.1021/es9028217.
3
Household water treatment in poor populations: is there enough evidence for scaling up now?
促进低收入和中等收入国家采用水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)技术的干预措施:有效性研究的证据与差距图
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 8;17(4):e1194. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1194. eCollection 2021 Dec.
4
Adoption of Point-of-Use Chlorination for Household Drinking Water Treatment: A Systematic Review.采用即时加氯法处理家庭饮用水:系统评价。
Environ Health Perspect. 2023 Jan;131(1):16001. doi: 10.1289/EHP10839. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
5
Effects of adding household water filters to Rwanda's Community-Based Environmental Health Promotion Programme: a cluster-randomized controlled trial in Rwamagana district.在卢旺达基于社区的环境卫生促进项目中添加家用净水器的效果:卢旺达马加尼亚区的一项整群随机对照试验
NPJ Clean Water. 2022;5(1):42. doi: 10.1038/s41545-022-00185-y. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
6
Effectiveness of interventions to improve drinking water, sanitation, and handwashing with soap on risk of diarrhoeal disease in children in low-income and middle-income settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.干预措施对改善低中收入环境中儿童饮水、环境卫生和用肥皂洗手对减少腹泻病的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2022 Jul 2;400(10345):48-59. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00937-0.
7
Narrative Review of Primary Preventive Interventions against Water-Borne Diseases: Scientific Evidence of Health-EDRM in Contexts with Inadequate Safe Drinking Water.水传播疾病一级预防干预措施述评:不安全饮用水背景下健康-生态-经济-管理现实关联的科学证据
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 23;18(23):12268. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312268.
8
Effect of household water treatment with chlorine on diarrhea among children under the age of five years in rural areas of Dire Dawa, eastern Ethiopia: a cluster randomized controlled trial.埃塞俄比亚迪雷达瓦农村地区使用氯进行家庭水处理对五岁以下儿童腹泻的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
Infect Dis Poverty. 2020 Jun 8;9(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s40249-020-00680-9.
9
Does a Free-Trial Approach Increase Purchase and Use of a Household Water Treatment and Safe Storage Product in Rural Haiti?免费试用方法是否会增加海地农村家庭对水疗和安全储存产品的购买和使用?
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Mar;102(3):518-525. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0606.
10
The Critical Role of Compliance in Delivering Health Gains from Environmental Health Interventions.合规在实现环境卫生干预带来的健康收益方面发挥着关键作用。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2019 Apr;100(4):777-779. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0624.
贫困人口的家庭水处理:现在是否有足够的证据支持扩大规模?
Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Feb 15;43(4):986-92. doi: 10.1021/es802232w.
4
Point of use household drinking water filtration: A practical, effective solution for providing sustained access to safe drinking water in the developing world.家庭饮用水终端过滤:为发展中国家持续提供安全饮用水的切实有效解决方案。
Environ Sci Technol. 2008 Jun 15;42(12):4261-7. doi: 10.1021/es702746n.
5
Treating water with chlorine at point-of-use to improve water quality and reduce child diarrhea in developing countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.在使用点用氯处理水以改善水质并减少发展中国家儿童腹泻:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007 Feb;76(2):354-64.
6
Integrating disease control strategies: balancing water sanitation and hygiene interventions to reduce diarrheal disease burden.整合疾病控制策略:平衡水、环境卫生与个人卫生干预措施以减轻腹泻病负担。
Am J Public Health. 2007 May;97(5):846-52. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.086207. Epub 2007 Jan 31.
7
Household based treatment of drinking water with flocculant-disinfectant for preventing diarrhoea in areas with turbid source water in rural western Kenya: cluster randomised controlled trial.肯尼亚西部农村地区水源浑浊时采用絮凝剂-消毒剂进行家庭饮用水处理以预防腹泻:整群随机对照试验
BMJ. 2005 Sep 3;331(7515):478. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38512.618681.E0. Epub 2005 Jul 26.
8
Delayed effectiveness of home-based interventions in reducing childhood diarrhea, Karachi, Pakistan.巴基斯坦卡拉奇:家庭干预措施在减少儿童腹泻方面的延迟效果
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004 Oct;71(4):420-7.
9
A randomized controlled trial of household-based flocculant-disinfectant drinking water treatment for diarrhea prevention in rural Guatemala.危地马拉农村地区基于家庭的絮凝剂-消毒剂饮用水处理预防腹泻的随机对照试验。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003 Oct;69(4):411-9.
10
Diarrhea prevention through household-level water disinfection and safe storage in Zambia.赞比亚通过家庭层面的水消毒和安全储存预防腹泻
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002 May;66(5):584-9. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2002.66.584.