• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生命终末期的矛盾心理:如何从伦理角度理解患者的意愿。

'Ambivalence' at the end of life: how to understand patients' wishes ethically.

机构信息

Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Switzerland. kathrin.ohnsorge@unibas

出版信息

Nurs Ethics. 2012 Sep;19(5):629-41. doi: 10.1177/0969733011436206.

DOI:10.1177/0969733011436206
PMID:22990424
Abstract

Health-care professionals in end-of-life care are frequently confronted with patients who seem to be 'ambivalent' about treatment decisions, especially if they express a wish to die. This article investigates this phenomenon by analysing two case stories based on narrative interviews with two patients and their caregivers. First, we argue that a respectful approach to patients requires acknowledging that coexistence of opposing wishes can be part of authentic, multi-layered experiences and moral understandings at the end of life. Second, caregivers need to understand when contradictory statements point to tensions in a patient's moral experience that require support. Third, caregivers should be careful not to negatively label or even pathologize seemingly contradictory patient statements.

摘要

临终关怀专业人员经常会遇到对治疗决策似乎“矛盾”的患者,尤其是当他们表达想死的愿望时。本文通过对两名患者及其护理人员的叙事访谈进行分析,探讨了这一现象。首先,我们认为,对患者的尊重要求承认,相互矛盾的愿望共存可能是生命末期真实、多层次的体验和道德理解的一部分。其次,护理人员需要了解当矛盾的陈述指向患者的道德体验中的紧张时,需要给予支持。第三,护理人员应注意不要对看似矛盾的患者陈述进行负面标记甚至病理化。

相似文献

1
'Ambivalence' at the end of life: how to understand patients' wishes ethically.生命终末期的矛盾心理:如何从伦理角度理解患者的意愿。
Nurs Ethics. 2012 Sep;19(5):629-41. doi: 10.1177/0969733011436206.
2
Communication on end-of-life decisions with patients wishing to die at home: the making of a guideline for GPs in Flanders, Belgium.与希望在家中离世的患者就临终决策进行沟通:比利时弗拉芒地区全科医生指南的制定
Br J Gen Pract. 2006 Jan;56(522):14-9.
3
Challenging patients' personal, cultural, and religious beliefs.挑战患者的个人、文化和宗教信仰。
J Clin Ethics. 2002 Winter;13(4):259-73.
4
[Withholding and withdrawing therapy--how does the physician make a decision?].[停止和撤销治疗——医生如何做出决策?]
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2009 May;44(5):380-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1224785. Epub 2009 May 13.
5
Patient requests to hasten death. Evaluation and management in terminal care.患者要求加速死亡。临终关怀中的评估与管理。
Arch Intern Med. 1994 Sep 26;154(18):2039-47.
6
Concordance of preferences for end-of-life care between terminally ill cancer patients and their family caregivers in Taiwan.台湾晚期癌症患者与其家庭照顾者在临终关怀偏好上的一致性。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2005 Dec;30(6):510-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.05.019.
7
Factors influencing death at home in terminally ill cancer patients.影响终末期癌症患者在家中死亡的因素。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2010 Apr;10(2):154-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0594.2009.00570.x.
8
[Improvement of palliative outpatient treatment of terminally ill cancer patients - SUPPORT as example - The ethically preferable alternative to euthanasia].[晚期癌症患者姑息门诊治疗的改善——以SUPPORT为例——安乐死在伦理上更可取的替代方案]
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2001 Sep;36(9):530-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-17256.
9
Discrepancy in the preferences of place of death between terminally ill cancer patients and their primary family caregivers in Taiwan.台湾晚期癌症患者与其主要家庭照顾者在死亡地点偏好上的差异。
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Oct;61(7):1560-6. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.02.006. Epub 2005 Apr 7.
10
The obligation to heal and patient autonomy in Jewish law.犹太律法中的治愈义务与患者自主权。
J Law Relig. 1998;13(2):351-77.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of motivational interviewing to promote advance care planning among palliative care patients in ambulatory care setting: a randomized controlled trial.动机性访谈对促进门诊姑息治疗患者的预先护理计划的效果:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Jan 31;24(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01667-9.
2
The double awareness of the wish to hasten death and the will to live: A secondary analysis of outlier patients from a mixed-methods study.对混合方法研究中离群患者的二次分析:对死亡加速愿望和生存意志的双重意识。
Palliat Med. 2024 Oct;38(9):1042-1053. doi: 10.1177/02692163241269689. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
3
"It's like crystal gazing": The Lived Experience of Anticipating End-of-Life Choices in Older Adults and Their Close Ones.
“就像水晶球占卜一样”:老年人及其亲近者对预期临终选择的生活体验。
Gerontologist. 2024 Jul 1;64(7). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnae061.
4
Nurses' perceptions of how their professional autonomy influences the moral dimension of end-of-life care to nursing home residents- a qualitative study.护士对其职业自主性如何影响养老院居民临终关怀道德维度的认知——一项定性研究
BMC Nurs. 2024 Mar 28;23(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-01865-5.
5
The state of transience, and its influence on the wish to die of advanced disease patients: insights from a qualitative phenomenological study.《过渡状态及其对晚期疾病患者死亡意愿的影响:一项定性现象学研究的启示》。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Feb 26;23(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01380-z.
6
Patient and Caregiver Expression of Reluctance and Ambivalence During Palliative Care Encounters.姑息治疗过程中患者及照护者不情愿与矛盾情绪的表达。
J Palliat Med. 2023 Jul 6;26(10):1391-4. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2022.0533.
7
Understanding why patients request euthanasia when it is illegal: a qualitative study in palliative care units on the personal and practical impact of euthanasia requests.理解在安乐死非法的情况下患者提出请求的原因:一项针对姑息治疗病房中安乐死请求的个人及实际影响的定性研究。
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2022 Jan 10;16:26323524211066925. doi: 10.1177/26323524211066925. eCollection 2022.
8
Relational autonomy in end-of-life care ethics: a contextualized approach to real-life complexities.临终关怀伦理中的关系自主性:一种应对现实生活复杂性的情境化方法。
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Jun 30;21(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00495-1.
9
The relationship between professional autonomy and moral distress among nurses working in children's units and pediatric intensive care wards.儿童病房和儿科重症监护病房护士的职业自主性与道德困扰之间的关系。
Int J Nurs Sci. 2017 Jan 31;4(2):117-121. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2017.01.007. eCollection 2017 Apr 10.
10
Engaging with patients who desire death: Interpretation, presence, and constraint.与渴望死亡的患者接触:解读、陪伴与约束。
Can Oncol Nurs J. 2017 Feb 1;27(1):56-64. doi: 10.5737/236880762715664. eCollection 2017 Winter.