Performance Management and Delivery Unit, Prime Minister's Department, Malaysia.
BMC Public Health. 2012;12 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-S1-S7. Epub 2012 Jun 22.
One of the challenges to maintain an agenda for universal coverage and equitable health system is to develop effective structuring and management of health financing. Global experiences with different systems of health financing suggests that a strong public role in health financing is essential for health systems to protect the poor and health systems with the strongest state role are likely the more equitable and achieve better aggregate health outcomes. Using Malaysia as a case study, this paper seeks to evaluate the progress and capacity of a middle income country in terms of health financing for universal coverage, and also to highlight some of the key underlying health systems challenges.The WHO Health Financing Strategy for the Asia Pacific Region (2010-2015) was used as the framework to evaluate the Malaysian healthcare financing system in terms of the provision of universal coverage for the population, and the Malaysian National Health Accounts (2008) provided the latest Malaysian data on health spending. Measuring against the four target indicators outlined, Malaysia fared credibly with total health expenditure close to 5% of its GDP (4.75%), out-of-pocket payment below 40% of total health expenditure (30.7%), comprehensive social safety nets for vulnerable populations, and a tax-based financing system that fundamentally poses as a national risk-pooled scheme for the population.Nonetheless, within a holistic systems framework, the financing component interacts synergistically with other health system spheres. In Malaysia, outmigration of public health workers particularly specialist doctors remains an issue and financing strategies critically needs to incorporate a comprehensive workforce compensation strategy to improve the health workforce skill mix. Health expenditure information is systematically collated, but feedback from the private sector remains a challenge. Service delivery-wise, there is a need to enhance financing capacity to expand preventive care, in better managing escalating healthcare costs associated with the increasing trend of non-communicable diseases. In tandem, health financing policies need to infuse the element of cost-effectiveness to better manage the purchasing of new medical supplies and equipment. Ultimately, good governance and leadership are needed to ensure adequate public spending on health and maintain the focus on the attainment of universal coverage, as well as making healthcare financing more accountable to the public, particularly in regards to inefficiencies and better utilisation of public funds and resources.
实现全民覆盖和公平的卫生系统的一个挑战是制定有效的卫生筹资结构和管理。全球不同卫生筹资系统的经验表明,强有力的公共卫生筹资作用对于保护穷人至关重要,而国家作用最强的卫生系统更有可能实现公平,并取得更好的总体健康结果。本文以马来西亚为例,评估了一个中等收入国家在全民覆盖卫生筹资方面的进展和能力,并强调了一些关键的卫生系统挑战。本文使用世卫组织《2010-2015 年亚太区域卫生筹资战略》作为框架,评估马来西亚卫生筹资系统在为全民提供覆盖方面的情况,并使用 2008 年马来西亚国家卫生账户提供了关于卫生支出的最新马来西亚数据。根据概述的四个目标指标衡量,马来西亚在以下方面表现良好:总卫生支出接近国内生产总值的 5%(4.75%);自付费用占总卫生支出的比例低于 40%(30.7%);为弱势群体提供全面的社会安全网;以及以税收为基础的筹资制度,从根本上为人口建立了国家风险池计划。然而,在整体系统框架内,筹资部分与其他卫生系统领域协同互动。在马来西亚,公共卫生工作者,特别是专科医生的外流仍然是一个问题,筹资战略必须认真纳入全面的劳动力薪酬战略,以提高卫生劳动力的技能组合。卫生支出信息是系统收集的,但私营部门的反馈仍然是一个挑战。在服务提供方面,需要增强筹资能力,扩大预防保健,更好地管理与非传染性疾病日益增加趋势相关的医疗费用不断上升的问题。与此同时,需要将成本效益因素融入卫生筹资政策,以更好地管理新的医疗用品和设备的采购。最终,需要良好的治理和领导能力,确保对卫生的充足公共支出,并关注全民覆盖的实现,以及使医疗保健筹资更加对公众负责,特别是在提高效率和更好地利用公共资金和资源方面。