Dept. of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
Neuroimage. 2012 Nov 15;63(3):1285-94. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.08.034. Epub 2012 Aug 21.
The lateral frontal cortex (LFC) is thought to represent contextual and rule-based information that allows adaptive behavior according to circumstance. Recent progress has suggested that the representations of the LFC vary along its rostral-caudal axis with more abstract, higher level representations associated with rostral areas of the LFC and more concrete, lower level representations associated with caudal areas of the LFC. Here, we investigated this proposal. Subjects responded to stimuli based upon a nested series of contextual cues stored in working memory (WM) while being scanned with fMRI. Higher level context cues denoted an abstract rule set while lower level context cues provided more concrete information. Using multi-variate pattern analysis (MVPA), we found varying forms of representation along the rostral-caudal axis of the LFC depending on the type of information stored in WM. Rostral areas of frontal cortex in the lateral orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) represented the higher level context, but not more concrete information, and only when more concrete information was unavailable. Mid-level areas in the mid-dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and inferior frontal junction (IFJ) represented more concrete rules, but only when the forthcoming response could not be anticipated. By contrast, the dorsal premotor cortex (PMd) and primary motor cortex (M1) represented contextual and response information when the forthcoming response could be anticipated on the basis of context. Collectively, these data indicate that representations dedicated to higher levels of abstraction become less discriminating when more concrete information becomes available. These patterns are consistent with rostral-caudal abstraction proposals of the LFC.
外侧额皮质(LFC)被认为代表了情境和基于规则的信息,这些信息使行为能够根据环境进行适应。最近的研究进展表明,LFC 的表示沿着其头尾轴变化,具有更抽象、更高层次的表示与 LFC 的头侧区域相关联,而更具体、更低层次的表示与 LFC 的尾侧区域相关联。在这里,我们研究了这一假说。被试在进行 fMRI 扫描的同时,根据工作记忆(WM)中存储的嵌套系列情境线索来响应刺激。较高层次的情境线索表示抽象规则集,而较低层次的情境线索提供更具体的信息。使用多变量模式分析(MVPA),我们发现,根据 WM 中存储的信息类型,LFC 的头尾轴上存在不同形式的表示。外侧眶额皮质(OFC)的额叶皮质头侧区域表示较高层次的情境,但不表示更具体的信息,只有在更具体的信息不可用时才表示。中侧背外侧前额叶皮质(DLPFC)和下额额区(IFJ)的中间区域表示更具体的规则,但只有在无法预测即将到来的反应时才表示。相比之下,背侧运动前皮质(PMd)和初级运动皮质(M1)在根据情境可以预测即将到来的反应时,表示情境和反应信息。总的来说,这些数据表明,当更具体的信息可用时,专门用于更高抽象层次的表示变得不那么具有辨别力。这些模式与 LFC 的头尾抽象假说一致。