• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颅脑损伤的多变量结局预测,重点关注实验室指标。

Multivariate outcome prediction in traumatic brain injury with focus on laboratory values.

机构信息

Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Section of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

J Neurotrauma. 2012 Nov 20;29(17):2613-24. doi: 10.1089/neu.2012.2468. Epub 2012 Nov 14.

DOI:10.1089/neu.2012.2468
PMID:22994879
Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Identifying factors relevant to outcome can provide a better understanding of TBI pathophysiology, in addition to aiding prognostication. Many common laboratory variables have been related to outcome but may not be independent predictors in a multivariate setting. In this study, 757 patients were identified in the Karolinska TBI database who had retrievable early laboratory variables. These were analyzed towards a dichotomized Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) with logistic regression and relevance vector machines, a non-linear machine learning method, univariately and controlled for the known important predictors in TBI outcome: age, Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), pupil response, and computed tomography (CT) score. Accuracy was assessed with Nagelkerke's pseudo R². Of the 18 investigated laboratory variables, 15 were found significant (p<0.05) towards outcome in univariate analyses. In contrast, when adjusting for other predictors, few remained significant. Creatinine was found an independent predictor of TBI outcome. Glucose, albumin, and osmolarity levels were also identified as predictors, depending on analysis method. A worse outcome related to increasing osmolarity may warrant further study. Importantly, hemoglobin was not found significant when adjusted for post-resuscitation GCS as opposed to an admission GCS, and timing of GCS can thus have a major impact on conclusions. In total, laboratory variables added an additional 1.3-4.4% to pseudo R².

摘要

创伤性脑损伤(TBI)是发病率和死亡率的主要原因。确定与结果相关的因素可以更好地了解 TBI 的病理生理学,除了有助于预后判断。许多常见的实验室变量与结果相关,但在多变量环境下可能不是独立的预测因素。在这项研究中,在 Karolinska TBI 数据库中确定了 757 名可检索到早期实验室变量的患者。使用逻辑回归和非线性机器学习方法——相关向量机对这些变量进行了分析,针对格拉斯哥结局量表(GOS)进行了二分类,并对 TBI 结果中的已知重要预测因素(年龄、格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)、瞳孔反应和计算机断层扫描(CT)评分)进行了单变量和控制分析。准确性通过 Nagelkerke 的伪 R²进行评估。在研究的 18 个实验室变量中,有 15 个在单变量分析中对结果有显著意义(p<0.05)。相比之下,当调整其他预测因素时,很少有变量仍然具有显著意义。肌酐被发现是 TBI 结果的独立预测因素。血糖、白蛋白和渗透压水平也被确定为预测因素,具体取决于分析方法。渗透压升高与预后不良相关,这可能需要进一步研究。重要的是,血红蛋白在调整后的 GCS 为复苏后 GCS 而不是入院 GCS 时没有显著意义,因此 GCS 的时间可能对结论有重大影响。总的来说,实验室变量使伪 R²增加了 1.3-4.4%。

相似文献

1
Multivariate outcome prediction in traumatic brain injury with focus on laboratory values.颅脑损伤的多变量结局预测,重点关注实验室指标。
J Neurotrauma. 2012 Nov 20;29(17):2613-24. doi: 10.1089/neu.2012.2468. Epub 2012 Nov 14.
2
Simplifying the use of prognostic information in traumatic brain injury. Part 2: Graphical presentation of probabilities.简化创伤性脑损伤预后信息的使用。第 2 部分:概率的图形表示。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Jun;128(6):1621-1634. doi: 10.3171/2017.12.JNS172782. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
3
Simplifying the use of prognostic information in traumatic brain injury. Part 1: The GCS-Pupils score: an extended index of clinical severity.简化创伤性脑损伤的预后信息使用。第 1 部分:GCS-瞳孔评分:临床严重程度的扩展指标。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Jun;128(6):1612-1620. doi: 10.3171/2017.12.JNS172780. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
4
Tau proteins in serum predict outcome after severe traumatic brain injury.血清中的 Tau 蛋白可预测严重创伤性脑损伤的预后。
J Surg Res. 2010 May 15;160(2):302-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2008.12.022. Epub 2009 Jan 10.
5
S100B is an important outcome predictor in traumatic brain injury.S100B 是创伤性脑损伤的重要预后指标。
J Neurotrauma. 2013 Apr 1;30(7):519-28. doi: 10.1089/neu.2012.2553. Epub 2013 Apr 15.
6
Decompressive craniectomy for elderly patients with traumatic brain injury: it's probably not worth the while.老年创伤性脑损伤患者去骨瓣减压术:可能得不偿失。
J Neurotrauma. 2011 Oct;28(10):2043-8. doi: 10.1089/neu.2011.1889. Epub 2011 Aug 29.
7
Extended analysis of early computed tomography scans of traumatic brain injured patients and relations to outcome.外伤性脑损伤患者早期 CT 扫描的扩展分析及其与预后的关系。
J Neurotrauma. 2010 Jan;27(1):51-64. doi: 10.1089/neu.2009.0986.
8
Usefulness of the abbreviated injury score and the injury severity score in comparison to the Glasgow Coma Scale in predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury.与格拉斯哥昏迷量表相比,简明损伤评分和损伤严重程度评分在预测创伤性脑损伤后结局方面的效用。
J Trauma. 2007 Apr;62(4):946-50. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000229796.14717.3a.
9
Glasgow coma scale motor score and pupillary reaction to predict six-month mortality in patients with traumatic brain injury: comparison of field and admission assessment.格拉斯哥昏迷量表运动评分及瞳孔反应对预测创伤性脑损伤患者6个月死亡率的研究:现场评估与入院评估的比较
J Neurotrauma. 2015 Jan 15;32(2):101-8. doi: 10.1089/neu.2014.3438. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
10
Limited predictive power of hospitalization variables for long-term cognitive prognosis in adult patients with severe traumatic brain injury.成人重型创伤性脑损伤患者住院变量对长期认知预后的预测能力有限。
J Neuropsychol. 2014 Mar;8(1):125-39. doi: 10.1111/jnp.12000. Epub 2012 Nov 20.

引用本文的文献

1
ASA score is an independent predictor of 1-year outcome after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury.美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分是中重度创伤性脑损伤后1年预后的独立预测指标。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2025 Feb 6;33(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13049-025-01338-x.
2
Prognostic value of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging findings in acute traumatic brain injury in prediction of poor neurological outcome and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.计算机断层扫描和磁共振成像在急性创伤性脑损伤中的预测不良神经结局和死亡率的预后价值:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurosurg Rev. 2024 Nov 6;47(1):837. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-03071-y.
3
Prediction performance of the machine learning model in predicting mortality risk in patients with traumatic brain injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
机器学习模型预测创伤性脑损伤患者死亡率风险的预测性能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Jul 29;23(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02247-8.
4
Detection of factors affecting kidney function using machine learning methods.利用机器学习方法检测影响肾功能的因素。
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 16;12(1):21740. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-26160-8.
5
Is C-reactive protein-albumin ratio or neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio a better indicator to predict in-hospital mortality in traumatic brain injury?C-反应蛋白-白蛋白比值与中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比值,哪项指标能更好地预测创伤性脑损伤患者的院内死亡率?
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2022 Oct;28(10):1482-1487. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2022.00794.
6
Predictive Factors of Return Home and Return to Work for Intensive Care Unit Survivors after Traumatic Brain Injury with a Follow-up Period of 2 Years.创伤性脑损伤后 ICU 幸存者 2 年随访期内的回家和重返工作岗位的预测因素。
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2022 Oct 15;62(10):465-474. doi: 10.2176/jns-nmc.2022-0149. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
7
The Value of Artificial Intelligence in Laboratory Medicine.人工智能在检验医学中的价值
Am J Clin Pathol. 2021 May 18;155(6):823-831. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqaa170.
8
A multi-domain prognostic model of disorder of consciousness using resting-state fMRI and laboratory parameters.使用静息态 fMRI 和实验室参数的意识障碍多领域预后模型。
Brain Imaging Behav. 2021 Aug;15(4):1966-1976. doi: 10.1007/s11682-020-00390-8. Epub 2020 Oct 11.
9
Comparison of admission serum albumin and hemoglobin as predictors of outcome in children with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: A retrospective study.入院时血清白蛋白和血红蛋白作为中重度创伤性脑损伤患儿预后预测指标的比较:一项回顾性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Nov;98(44):e17806. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017806.
10
Distribution of Laboratory Parameters in Trauma Population.创伤人群实验室参数的分布情况。
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2018 Jan-Mar;11(1):10-14. doi: 10.4103/JETS.JETS_70_17.