• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

州立法者对基于证据的肥胖减少政策的支持。

State legislators' support for evidence-based obesity reduction policies.

机构信息

Department of Public & Allied Health, Bowling Green State University, 216 Health Center, Bowling Green, OH 43403, USA.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2012 Nov;55(5):427-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.09.008. Epub 2012 Sep 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.09.008
PMID:22995372
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to gauge state legislators' level of support for evidence-based obesity reduction policies.

METHODS

A list of 17 potential obesity reduction measures was sent via a valid and reliable survey questionnaire to a random sample of 800 state legislators from all 50 United States in 2011. Legislators were asked to rate their support for each measure on a three-point Likert-type scale.

RESULTS

There were 250 questionnaires returned. Chi-square tests revealed no significant differences between respondents and non-respondents by sex, political affiliation, or chamber designation. Respondents were approximately evenly split between Republicans (n=117) and Democrats (n=122). Overall, public school and community-based measures were supported at approximately the same levels. Linear regression revealed that political affiliation, race, and perceiving obesity as a serious societal problem were significant predictors of legislator support for obesity reduction policies. Legislator body mass index, level of education, and geographic location were not significant predictors of support.

CONCLUSIONS

Public health advocates interested in promoting obesity prevention legislation at the state level are most likely to find support among non-white female Democratic legislators regardless of their BMI who perceive obesity to be a serious societal problem.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估州立法者对基于证据的肥胖减少政策的支持程度。

方法

2011 年,通过有效且可靠的问卷调查,向来自美国 50 个州的 800 名随机州立法者发送了一份包含 17 项潜在肥胖减少措施的清单。立法者被要求在三点李克特量表上对每项措施的支持程度进行评分。

结果

共收回 250 份问卷。卡方检验显示,在性别、政治派别或议会指定方面,答复者与未答复者之间没有显著差异。答复者在共和党(n=117)和民主党(n=122)之间大致平分秋色。总体而言,公立学校和社区措施的支持程度大致相同。线性回归显示,政治派别、种族和将肥胖视为严重的社会问题是立法者支持肥胖减少政策的重要预测因素。立法者的体重指数、教育水平和地理位置不是支持的重要预测因素。

结论

对在州一级推动预防肥胖立法感兴趣的公共卫生倡导者最有可能在非白女性民主党立法者中找到支持,无论他们的 BMI 如何,只要他们认为肥胖是一个严重的社会问题。

相似文献

1
State legislators' support for evidence-based obesity reduction policies.州立法者对基于证据的肥胖减少政策的支持。
Prev Med. 2012 Nov;55(5):427-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.09.008. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
2
Predictors of state legislators' intentions to vote for cigarette tax increases.州立法者投票支持提高香烟税意图的预测因素。
Prev Med. 1998 Mar-Apr;27(2):157-65. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1998.0308.
3
Kansas legislators prioritize obesity but overlook nutrition and physical activity issues.堪萨斯州立法者优先考虑肥胖问题,但忽视了营养和身体活动问题。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2013 Mar-Apr;19(2):139-45. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e318254cc57.
4
Predictors of Canadian legislators' support for tobacco control policies.加拿大立法者对烟草控制政策支持度的预测因素。
Soc Sci Med. 2002 Sep;55(6):1069-76. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00244-1.
5
Legislators' views on tobacco policy: are there regional differences in Kentucky?立法者对烟草政策的看法:肯塔基州存在地区差异吗?
South Med J. 2002 Mar;95(3):324-30.
6
Public opinion and legislators' views on tobacco policy.公众舆论与立法者对烟草政策的看法。
J Ky Med Assoc. 2000 Feb;98(2):67-73.
7
Partisan differences in the effects of economic evidence and local data on legislator engagement with dissemination materials about behavioral health: a dissemination trial.党派差异对经济证据和当地数据影响立法者参与传播行为健康材料的作用:一项传播试验。
Implement Sci. 2022 Jun 22;17(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01214-7.
8
State legislators' attitudes and voting intentions toward tobacco control legislation.州立法者对烟草控制立法的态度和投票意向。
Am J Public Health. 1997 Jul;87(7):1197-200. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.7.1197.
9
Facts versus values: why legislators vote against injury control laws.事实与价值观:立法者为何投票反对伤害控制法。
J Trauma. 1993 Nov;35(5):786-92; discussion 792-3.
10
The relationship among state laws, district policies, and elementary school-based measurement of children's body mass index.州法律、地区政策与小学儿童身体质量指数测量之间的关系。
J Sch Health. 2012 May;82(5):239-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2012.00693.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Longitudinal policy surveillance of state obesity legislation in California, 1999-2020.1999-2020 年加利福尼亚州肥胖立法的纵向政策监测。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Nov 6;24(1):3064. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20557-y.
2
Municipal officials' perspectives on policymaking for addressing obesity and health equity.市政官员对解决肥胖问题和健康公平性政策制定的看法。
Evid Policy. 2023;19(3):444-464. doi: 10.1332/174426421x16793276974116.
3
Obesity prevention across the US: A review of state-level policies from 2009 to 2019.美国的肥胖预防:2009年至2019年州级政策综述
Obes Sci Pract. 2022 Jun 15;9(2):95-102. doi: 10.1002/osp4.621. eCollection 2023 Apr.
4
The harmful effects of partisan polarization on health.党派两极分化对健康的有害影响。
PNAS Nexus. 2022 Mar 9;1(1):pgac011. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac011. eCollection 2022 Mar.
5
Measuring public opinion and acceptability of prevention policies: an integrative review and narrative synthesis of methods.测量公众意见和预防政策的可接受性:方法的综合评价和叙述性综合。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Mar 4;20(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00829-y.
6
Linking Data on Constituent Health with Elected Officials' Opinions: Associations Between Urban Health Disparities and Mayoral Officials' Beliefs About Health Disparities in Their Cities.将居民健康数据与民选官员意见相联系:城市健康差异与市长对本市健康差异看法之间的关联。
Milbank Q. 2021 Sep;99(3):794-827. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12501. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
7
Pennsylvania policymakers' knowledge, attitudes and likelihood for action regarding waterpipe tobacco smoking and electronic nicotine delivery systems.宾夕法尼亚州政策制定者关于水烟吸食和电子尼古丁传送系统的知识、态度及采取行动的可能性。
Tob Prev Cessat. 2018 Apr 24;4:14. doi: 10.18332/tpc/89624. eCollection 2018.
8
State Legislators' Support for Behavioral Health Parity Laws: The Influence of Mutable and Fixed Factors at Multiple Levels.州立法者对行为健康平等法的支持:多层次可变因素和固定因素的影响
Milbank Q. 2019 Dec;97(4):1200-1232. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12431. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
9
Audience segmentation to disseminate behavioral health evidence to legislators: an empirical clustering analysis.向立法者传播行为健康证据的受众细分:一项实证聚类分析。
Implement Sci. 2018 Sep 19;13(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0816-8.
10
Consolidated state political party control and the enactment of obesity-related policies in the United States.美国政党合并与肥胖相关政策的制定。
Prev Med. 2017 Dec;105:397-403. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.08.028. Epub 2017 Sep 1.