Parks Renee G, Thomas Fanice, Morshed Alexandra B, Dodson Elizabeth A, Tian Ruiyi, Politi Mary C, Eyler Amy A, Thomas Ian, Brownson Ross C
Prevention Research Center, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.
Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.
Evid Policy. 2023;19(3):444-464. doi: 10.1332/174426421x16793276974116.
Obesity evidence-based policies (EBPs) can make a lasting, positive impact on community health; however, policy development and enactment is complex and dependent on multiple forces.
This study investigated key factors affecting municipal officials' policymaking for obesity and related health disparities.
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 local officials from a selection of municipalities with high obesity or related health disparities across the United States between December 2020 and April 2021.
Policymakers follow a general decision-making process with limited distinction between health and other policy areas. Factors affecting policymaking included: being informed about other local, state, and federal policy, conducting their own research using trustworthy sources, and seeking constituent and stakeholder perspectives. Key facilitators included the need for timely, relevant local data, and seeing or hearing from those impacted. Key local policymaking barriers included constituent opposition, misinformation, controversial issues with contentious solutions, and limited understanding of the connection between issues and obesity/health. Policymakers had a range of understanding about causes of health disparities, including views of individual choices, environmental influences on behaviors, and structural factors impacting health. To address health disparities, municipal officials described: a variety of roles policymakers can take, limitations based on the scope of government, challenges with intergovernmental collaboration or across government levels, ability of policymakers and government employees to understand the problem, and the challenge of framing health disparities given the social-political context.
Understanding factors affecting the uptake of EBPs can inform local-level interventions that encourage EBP adoption.
基于证据的肥胖政策(EBPs)可对社区健康产生持久的积极影响;然而,政策制定和实施过程复杂,且依赖多种力量。
本研究调查了影响市政官员制定肥胖及相关健康差距政策的关键因素。
2020年12月至2021年4月期间,对来自美国各地肥胖率高或存在相关健康差距的多个城市的20名地方官员进行了半结构化访谈。
政策制定者遵循一般决策过程,在健康政策领域和其他政策领域之间的区别有限。影响政策制定的因素包括:了解其他地方、州和联邦政策,使用可靠来源进行自身研究,以及征求选民和利益相关者的意见。关键促进因素包括需要及时、相关的本地数据,以及了解或听取受影响者的意见。关键的地方政策制定障碍包括选民反对、错误信息、解决方案存在争议的争议性问题,以及对问题与肥胖/健康之间联系的理解有限。政策制定者对健康差距的成因有一系列理解,包括个人选择的观点、环境对行为的影响以及影响健康的结构因素。为解决健康差距问题,市政官员描述了:政策制定者可以扮演的各种角色、基于政府范围的限制、政府间合作或跨政府层面的挑战、政策制定者和政府雇员理解问题的能力,以及在社会政治背景下界定健康差距的挑战。
了解影响基于证据的政策采纳的因素可为鼓励采纳基于证据的政策的地方层面干预措施提供信息。