• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在荷兰,使用慢性病患者的工作限制问卷。

Using the work limitations questionnaire in patients with a chronic condition in the Netherlands.

机构信息

Centre of Expertise Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Occup Environ Med. 2012 Oct;54(10):1293-9. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31825cb68d.

DOI:10.1097/JOM.0b013e31825cb68d
PMID:22995808
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the intelligibility and psychometric properties of the modified Dutch language version of the Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ) (WLQ-mdlv).

METHODS

Employed patients with a physical chronic condition completed the WLQ-mdlv, the Work Ability Index, and the 36-item short form health survey. Intelligibility, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and external construct validity of the WLQ-mdlv were assessed.

RESULTS

In 125 patients, the WLQ-mdlv showed improved intelligibility for a Dutch population. With Cronbach α coefficients more than .80, squared weighted κ of 0.63 or more (individual items), intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.83 or more (WLQ scales), a minimal detectable change of four points (WLQ index), and negative correlations with the Work Ability Index and related 36-item short form health survey scales reliability and external construct validity of the WLQ-mdlv were confirmed.

CONCLUSION

The WLQ-mdlv is an intelligible, reliable, and valid instrument for evaluating work limitations in employees with a chronic condition in the Netherlands.

摘要

目的

考察改良后的荷兰语版工作限制问卷(WLQ)(WLQ-mdlv)的可理解性和心理测量学特性。

方法

采用具有身体慢性疾病的患者完成了 WLQ-mdlv、工作能力指数和 36 项简短健康调查。评估了 WLQ-mdlv 的可理解性、内部一致性、重测信度和外部结构效度。

结果

在 125 名患者中,WLQ-mdlv 显示出对荷兰人群更好的可理解性。Cronbach α 系数大于.80,平方加权 κ 大于 0.63(单项),内类相关系数大于 0.83(WLQ 量表),最小可检测变化为 4 分(WLQ 指数),与工作能力指数呈负相关,与相关 36 项简短健康调查量表具有可靠性和外部结构效度。

结论

WLQ-mdlv 是一种可理解、可靠且有效的工具,可用于评估荷兰患有慢性疾病的员工的工作限制。

相似文献

1
Using the work limitations questionnaire in patients with a chronic condition in the Netherlands.在荷兰,使用慢性病患者的工作限制问卷。
J Occup Environ Med. 2012 Oct;54(10):1293-9. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31825cb68d.
2
Validity and Reliability of the 8-Item Work Limitations Questionnaire.八条目工作限制问卷的有效性和可靠性。
J Occup Rehabil. 2017 Dec;27(4):576-583. doi: 10.1007/s10926-016-9687-5.
3
Work limitations among working persons with rheumatoid arthritis: results, reliability, and validity of the work limitations questionnaire in 836 patients.类风湿关节炎患者的工作限制:836例患者工作限制问卷的结果、信度和效度
J Rheumatol. 2005 Jun;32(6):1006-12.
4
[Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Work Limitations Questionnaire in employees of multiple private companies].[日本版工作限制问卷在多家民营企业员工中的信度和效度]
Sangyo Eiseigaku Zasshi. 2017 Jan 31;59(1):1-8. doi: 10.1539/sangyoeisei.16-002-E. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
5
[Translation into Brazilian Portuguese and validation of the Work Limitations Questionnaire].[《工作限制问卷》的巴西葡萄牙语翻译及验证]
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2007 Jul;22(1):21-8. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892007000600003.
6
Work performance assessed by a newly developed Japanese version of the Work Limitation Questionnaire in a general Japanese adult population.在一般日本成年人群体中,通过新开发的日语版工作限制问卷评估工作表现。
J Occup Health. 2014;56(2):124-33. doi: 10.1539/joh.13-0087-oa. Epub 2014 Feb 28.
7
Psychometric properties of the 25-item Work Limitations Questionnaire in Japan: factor structure, validity, and reliability in information and communication technology company employees.25 项工作限制问卷在日本的心理计量学特性:信息和通信技术公司员工的因子结构、效度和信度。
J Occup Environ Med. 2014 Feb;56(2):184-8. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000082.
8
Validity and Reliability of the Dutch Version of the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12NL) in Patients With Disorders of the Hip.荷兰版国际髋关节结局工具(iHOT-12NL)在髋关节疾病患者中的有效性和可靠性。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2015 Dec;45(12):1026-34, A1-2. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2015.6178. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
9
Measuring illness beliefs in patients with lower extremity injuries: reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the Somatic Pre-Occupation and Coping questionnaire (SPOC-NL).测量下肢损伤患者的疾病认知:荷兰版躯体先占观念与应对问卷(SPOC-NL)的信效度
Injury. 2015 Feb;46(2):308-14. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.08.042. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
10
[Development of the Work Limitations Questionnaire Japanese version (WLQ-J): fundamental examination of the reliability and validity of the WLQ-J].[工作限制问卷日语版(WLQ-J)的开发:WLQ-J可靠性和有效性的基础检验]
Sangyo Eiseigaku Zasshi. 2012;54(3):101-7. doi: 10.1539/sangyoeisei.b11011.

引用本文的文献

1
Health outcomes up to 3 years and post-exertional malaise in patients after hospitalization for COVID-19: a multicentre prospective cohort study (CO-FLOW).新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)住院患者长达3年的健康结局及运动后不适:一项多中心前瞻性队列研究(CO-FLOW)
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2025 Apr 6;53:101290. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101290. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Development of a standard set of key work-related outcomes for use in practice for patients with cardiovascular disease: a modified Delphi study.制定一套用于心血管疾病患者实践的关键工作相关结局标准集:一项改良德尔菲研究。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Dec 18;8(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00825-6.
3
Impact of hearing impairment and cochlear implantation on productivity and social well-being in a professionally active but severely hearing-impaired group: protocol of the 'Hear again, work again' longitudinal prospective cohort study.
职业活跃但重度听力受损人群中听力障碍及人工耳蜗植入对生产力和社会福祉的影响:“再次听见,再次工作”纵向前瞻性队列研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 8;13(3):e064514. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064514.
4
The association of subjective fit perceptions, distress, emotional exhaustion, and work engagement, with work functioning problems: A cross-sectional study conducted among young construction project management professionals.主观契合感知、困扰、情绪耗竭和工作投入与工作功能障碍的关联:一项在年轻建筑项目管理专业人员中进行的横断面研究。
J Occup Health. 2020 Jan;62(1):e12174. doi: 10.1002/1348-9585.12174.
5
The relationship between organizational policies and practices and work limitations among hospital patient care workers.医院患者护理人员的组织政策与实践和工作限制之间的关系。
Am J Ind Med. 2018 May 29. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22864.
6
Job retention vocational rehabilitation for employed people with inflammatory arthritis (WORK-IA): a feasibility randomized controlled trial.炎症性关节炎在职人员的工作保留职业康复(WORK-IA):一项可行性随机对照试验。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Jul 21;18(1):315. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1671-5.
7
Validity and Reliability of the 8-Item Work Limitations Questionnaire.八条目工作限制问卷的有效性和可靠性。
J Occup Rehabil. 2017 Dec;27(4):576-583. doi: 10.1007/s10926-016-9687-5.
8
Measuring Work Functioning: Validity of a Weighted Composite Work Functioning Approach.衡量工作功能:加权综合工作功能方法的效度
J Occup Rehabil. 2015 Sep;25(3):537-42. doi: 10.1007/s10926-014-9560-3.
9
Quality of working life issues of employees with a chronic physical disease: a systematic review.患有慢性身体疾病员工的工作生活质量问题:一项系统综述
J Occup Rehabil. 2015 Mar;25(1):182-96. doi: 10.1007/s10926-014-9517-6.
10
Measurement properties of the Work Limitations Questionnaire were sufficient among cancer survivors.工作限制问卷的测量属性在癌症幸存者中是足够的。
Qual Life Res. 2014 Mar;23(2):515-25. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0484-8. Epub 2013 Jul 27.