• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用 CAS 评分对颈动脉支架置入术进行术前风险量化:来自 NCDR CARE 注册研究的报告。

Pre-procedural risk quantification for carotid stenting using the CAS score: a report from the NCDR CARE Registry.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Oct 23;60(17):1617-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.026. Epub 2012 Sep 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.026
PMID:22999733
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We developed and internally validated a risk score to predict in-hospital stroke or death after carotid artery stenting (CAS).

BACKGROUND

A tool that accurately assesses CAS risk could aid clinical decision making and improve patient selection.

METHODS

Patients undergoing CAS without acute evolving stroke from April 2005 through June 2011 as part of the NCDR Carotid Artery Revascularization and Endarterectomy (CARE) Registry were included. In-hospital stroke or death was modeled using logistic regression with 35 candidate variables. Internal validation was achieved with bootstrapping, and model discrimination and calibration were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 271 (2.4%) primary endpoint events occurred during 11,122 procedures. Independent predictors of stroke or death included impending major surgery, previous stroke, age, symptomatic lesion, atrial fibrillation, and absence of previous ipsilateral carotid endarterectomy. The model was well calibrated with moderate discriminatory ability (C-statistic: 0.71) overall, and within symptomatic (C-statistic: 0.68) and asymptomatic (C-statistic: 0.72) subgroups. The inclusion of available angiographic variables did not improve model performance (C-statistic: 0.72, integrated discrimination improvement 0.001; p = 0.21). The NCDR CAS score was developed to support prospective risk quantification.

CONCLUSIONS

The NCDR CAS score, comprising 6 clinical variables, predicts in-hospital S/D after CAS. This tool may be useful to assist clinicians in evaluating optimal management, share more accurate pre-procedural risks with patients, and improve patient selection for CAS.

摘要

目的

我们开发并内部验证了一种风险评分模型,用于预测颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)后住院期间的卒中或死亡风险。

背景

一种能够准确评估 CAS 风险的工具可以辅助临床决策,并改善患者选择。

方法

我们纳入了 2005 年 4 月至 2011 年 6 月期间作为 NCDR 颈动脉血管重建和内膜切除术(CARE)登记研究一部分的、接受 CAS 治疗且未发生急性进展性卒中的患者。使用逻辑回归对 35 个候选变量进行了住院期间卒中或死亡的建模。采用自举法进行内部验证,并评估了模型的区分度和校准度。

结果

在 11122 例手术中,共有 271 例(2.4%)患者发生主要终点事件。卒中或死亡的独立预测因素包括即将进行的重大手术、既往卒中、年龄、症状性病变、心房颤动和同侧颈动脉内膜切除术的既往史。该模型总体上具有良好的校准度和中度的区分能力(C 统计量:0.71),在症状性(C 统计量:0.68)和无症状性(C 统计量:0.72)亚组中也是如此。纳入可用的血管造影变量并未改善模型性能(C 统计量:0.72,综合判别改善 0.001;p = 0.21)。NCDR CAS 评分旨在支持前瞻性风险量化。

结论

NCDR CAS 评分由 6 个临床变量组成,可预测 CAS 后住院期间的 S/D 事件。该工具可能有助于辅助临床医生评估最佳治疗方案,与患者更准确地分享术前风险,并改善 CAS 的患者选择。

相似文献

1
Pre-procedural risk quantification for carotid stenting using the CAS score: a report from the NCDR CARE Registry.使用 CAS 评分对颈动脉支架置入术进行术前风险量化:来自 NCDR CARE 注册研究的报告。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Oct 23;60(17):1617-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.026. Epub 2012 Sep 19.
2
Carotid endarterectomy was performed with lower stroke and death rates than carotid artery stenting in the United States in 2003 and 2004.2003年和2004年在美国,颈动脉内膜切除术的实施带来的中风和死亡率低于颈动脉支架置入术。
J Vasc Surg. 2007 Dec;46(6):1112-1118. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.08.030.
3
Risk-adjusted 30-day outcomes of carotid stenting and endarterectomy: results from the SVS Vascular Registry.颈动脉支架置入术和动脉内膜切除术的风险调整后30天结局:来自血管外科学会(SVS)血管登记处的结果
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Jan;49(1):71-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.08.039. Epub 2008 Nov 22.
4
The CAPTURE registry: predictors of outcomes in carotid artery stenting with embolic protection for high surgical risk patients in the early post-approval setting.CAPTURE注册研究:早期批准后使用栓子保护装置对高手术风险患者进行颈动脉支架置入术的预后预测因素。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007 Dec 1;70(7):1025-33. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21359.
5
Carotid artery stenting has increased rates of postprocedure stroke, death, and resource utilization than does carotid endarterectomy in the United States, 2005.在美国2005年,与颈动脉内膜切除术相比,颈动脉支架置入术增加了术后中风、死亡及资源利用的发生率。
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Dec;48(6):1442-50, 1450.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.07.017. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
6
Intracranial hemorrhage after carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting in the United States in 2005.2005年美国颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术后颅内出血情况
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Mar;49(3):623-8; discussion 628-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.09.064.
7
Analysis of Florida and New York state hospital discharges suggests that carotid stenting in symptomatic women is associated with significant increase in mortality and perioperative morbidity compared with carotid endarterectomy.对佛罗里达州和纽约州医院出院患者的分析表明,与颈动脉内膜切除术相比,症状性女性颈动脉支架置入术与死亡率和围手术期发病率显著增加相关。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Aug;56(2):334-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.01.066. Epub 2012 May 12.
8
Carotid artery stenting: do procedural complications relate to the side intervened upon?: results from the Carotid Artery Stent (CAS)-Registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte (ALKK).颈动脉支架置入术:手术并发症与干预侧有关吗?:来自德国心脏病医院协会(ALKK)颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)注册研究的结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Jul 1;74(1):1-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22050.
9
CAPTURE 2 risk-adjusted stroke outcome benchmarks for carotid artery stenting with distal embolic protection.使用远端栓塞保护装置的颈动脉支架置入术的 CAPTURE 2 风险调整后的卒中结果基准。
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Sep;52(3):576-83, 583.e1-583.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.03.064. Epub 2010 Jun 23.
10
Outcome of carotid artery stenting for primary versus restenotic lesions.原发性病变与再狭窄病变的颈动脉支架置入术结果
Ann Vasc Surg. 2009 May-Jun;23(3):330-4. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2008.05.013. Epub 2008 Aug 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Direct oral anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy for extracranial neurovascular stenting in patients with atrial fibrillation.直接口服抗凝药和抗血小板治疗用于心房颤动患者的颅外神经血管支架置入术
BMC Neurol. 2025 May 24;25(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12883-025-04240-2.
2
Atrial fibrillation in vascular surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis on prevalence, incidence and outcome implications.血管外科中的心房颤动:患病率、发病率和结局影响的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2023 Sep 1;24(9):612-624. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000001533.
3
Carotid artery stenting without embolic protection: A randomized multicenter trial (the CASWEP trial).
颈动脉支架置入术无栓子保护:一项随机多中心试验(CASWEP 试验)。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2023 Aug;29(4):419-425. doi: 10.1177/15910199221094388. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
4
External Validation of Risk Prediction Models to Improve Selection of Patients for Carotid Endarterectomy.风险预测模型的外部验证可改善颈动脉内膜切除术患者的选择。
Stroke. 2022 Jan;53(1):87-99. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032527. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
5
Predictors of Perioperative Stroke/Death after Carotid Artery Stenting: A Review Article.颈动脉支架置入术后围手术期卒中/死亡的预测因素:一篇综述文章。
Ann Vasc Dis. 2018 Mar 25;11(1):15-24. doi: 10.3400/avd.ra.17-00136.
6
Carotid Artery Stenting 2013: Thumbs up.2013年颈动脉支架置入术:值得肯定。
Cardiol Res. 2013 Feb;4(1):8-14. doi: 10.4021/cr253w. Epub 2013 Mar 8.
7
Risk Factors for Incident Carotid Artery Revascularization among Older Adults: The Cardiovascular Health Study.老年人颈动脉血管重建术发生风险因素:心血管健康研究
Cerebrovasc Dis Extra. 2016;6(3):129-139. doi: 10.1159/000452426. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
8
Risk analysis of carotid stent from a population-based database in Taiwan.台湾基于人群数据库的颈动脉支架风险分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Aug;95(35):e4747. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004747.
9
A comparison of clinical outcomes from carotid artery stenting among US hospitals.美国各医院颈动脉支架置入术临床结果的比较。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014 Jul;7(4):574-80. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000819. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
10
Medical specialty society-sponsored data registries: opportunities in plastic surgery.医学专业学会资助的数据注册研究:整形外科学的机遇。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Jul;132(1):159e-167e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182910cf4.