• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估社交互动偏好。

Assessing preference for social interactions.

机构信息

Department of Special Education and Rehabilitation, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322-2810, United States.

出版信息

Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Jan;34(1):362-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2012.07.028. Epub 2012 Sep 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.ridd.2012.07.028
PMID:23009945
Abstract

We examined a procedure to assess preference for social interactions in individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Preferences were identified in five individuals using a paired-choice procedure in which participants approached therapists who provided different forms of social interactions. A subsequent tracking test showed that participants' approaches were under control of the form of social interaction provided as opposed to idiosyncratic features of the therapists. Results of a reinforcer assessment found that the social interaction identified as preferred also functioned as a reinforcer for all five participants.

摘要

我们研究了一种评估智力和发育障碍个体社交互动偏好的方法。通过一项配对选择程序,我们在五名参与者中确定了偏好,参与者接近提供不同形式社交互动的治疗师。随后的跟踪测试表明,参与者的接近是由提供的社交互动形式控制的,而不是治疗师的特质。强化物评估的结果发现,被确定为偏好的社交互动对所有五名参与者也起到了强化物的作用。

相似文献

1
Assessing preference for social interactions.评估社交互动偏好。
Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Jan;34(1):362-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2012.07.028. Epub 2012 Sep 23.
2
Further examination of factors that influence preference for positive versus negative reinforcement.进一步研究影响对正强化与负强化偏好的因素。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2007 Spring;40(1):25-44. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2007.151-05.
3
Using pictures to assess reinforcers in individuals with developmental disabilities.使用图片评估发育障碍个体的强化物。
Behav Modif. 2003 Sep;27(4):470-83. doi: 10.1177/0145445503255602.
4
Evaluating the predictive validity of a single stimulus engagement preference assessment.评估单一刺激参与偏好评估的预测效度。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2001 Winter;34(4):475-85. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2001.34-475.
5
The effects of pairing non-preferred staff with preferred stimuli on increasing the reinforcing value of non-preferred staff attention.将非偏好性工作人员与偏好性刺激配对对提高非偏好性工作人员关注的强化价值的影响。
Res Dev Disabil. 2014 Apr;35(4):849-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.01.014. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
6
An evaluation of the use of eye gaze to measure preference of individuals with severe physical and developmental disabilities.一项关于使用目光注视来测量重度身体和发育残疾个体偏好的评估。
Dev Neurorehabil. 2010;13(4):266-75. doi: 10.3109/17518421003705706.
7
Comparing preference assessments: selection- versus duration-based preference assessment procedures.比较偏好评估:基于选择与基于持续时间的偏好评估程序
Res Dev Disabil. 2009 Sep-Oct;30(5):1068-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2009.02.010. Epub 2009 Mar 26.
8
Including unfamiliar stimuli in preference assessments for young children with autism.将不熟悉的刺激物纳入自闭症儿童偏好评估中。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2013 Fall;46(3):689-94. doi: 10.1002/jaba.56. Epub 2013 Jul 10.
9
Using a choice assessment to predict reinforcer effectiveness.使用选择评估来预测强化物的有效性。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Spring;29(1):1-9. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-1.
10
Assessing preferences of individuals with acquired brain injury using alternative stimulus modalities.使用替代刺激方式评估获得性脑损伤患者的偏好。
Brain Inj. 2013;27(1):48-59. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2012.722250.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancing Methods in Animal-Assisted Intervention: Demonstration of Starting Points in Clinical Practice for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.动物辅助干预的先进方法:自闭症谱系障碍儿童临床实践起点的示范
Behav Anal Pract. 2022 Apr 11;16(1):145-155. doi: 10.1007/s40617-022-00704-w. eCollection 2023 Mar.
2
Stimulus Preference Assessment Decision-Making System (SPADS): A Decision-Making Model for Practitioners.刺激偏好评估决策系统(SPADS):从业者的决策模型
Behav Anal Pract. 2021 Apr 30;14(4):1144-1156. doi: 10.1007/s40617-020-00539-3. eCollection 2021 Dec.
3
Using Pictures Depicting App Icons to Conduct an MSWO Preference Assessment on a Tablet Device.
使用描绘应用程序图标的图片在平板电脑设备上进行改良单一刺激偏好评估。
Behav Anal Pract. 2018 Oct 30;12(2):335-342. doi: 10.1007/s40617-018-00309-2. eCollection 2019 Jun.
4
A quantitative review of overjustification effects in persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities.对智力和发育障碍者过度合理化效应的定量综述。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2017 Apr;50(2):206-221. doi: 10.1002/jaba.359. Epub 2016 Oct 14.