• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用描绘应用程序图标的图片在平板电脑设备上进行改良单一刺激偏好评估。

Using Pictures Depicting App Icons to Conduct an MSWO Preference Assessment on a Tablet Device.

作者信息

Hoffmann Audrey N, Brady Anna M, Paskins Ryan T, Sellers Tyra P

机构信息

1Department of Education, Northern Vermont University-Johnson, 337 College Hill, Johnson, VT 05656-9741 USA.

2Department of Special Education and Rehabilitation, Utah State University, Logan, UT USA.

出版信息

Behav Anal Pract. 2018 Oct 30;12(2):335-342. doi: 10.1007/s40617-018-00309-2. eCollection 2019 Jun.

DOI:10.1007/s40617-018-00309-2
PMID:31976239
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6745577/
Abstract

Identifying preferred content on tablet devices may be important when using such devices in programming. This study included six adults with disabilities and examined using laminated picture cards depicting application (app) icons to conduct multiple-stimulus without replacement (MSWO) preference assessments of iPad content. Following identification of preference hierarchies, we conducted reinforcer assessments to validate preference assessment results by demonstrating that selected apps functioned as reinforcers. We identified preference hierarchies for all participants, and the highest preferred app functioned as a reinforcer for a vocational task in five out of six participants' reinforcer assessments.

摘要

在编程中使用平板电脑设备时,识别其偏好内容可能很重要。本研究纳入了6名成年残疾人,并使用描绘应用程序(app)图标的分层图片卡片,对iPad内容进行无替换多刺激(MSWO)偏好评估。在确定偏好等级后,我们进行了强化物评估,通过证明所选应用程序起到强化物的作用来验证偏好评估结果。我们确定了所有参与者的偏好等级,在六名参与者的强化物评估中,有五名参与者的最高偏好应用程序在一项职业任务中起到了强化物的作用。

相似文献

1
Using Pictures Depicting App Icons to Conduct an MSWO Preference Assessment on a Tablet Device.使用描绘应用程序图标的图片在平板电脑设备上进行改良单一刺激偏好评估。
Behav Anal Pract. 2018 Oct 30;12(2):335-342. doi: 10.1007/s40617-018-00309-2. eCollection 2019 Jun.
2
Comparing the results of one-session, two-session, and three-session MSWO preference assessments.比较单次、双次和三次 MSWO 偏好评估的结果。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2021 Apr;54(2):700-712. doi: 10.1002/jaba.808. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
3
A comparison of methods for assessing preference for social interactions.评估社交互动偏好的方法比较。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2020 Apr;53(2):918-937. doi: 10.1002/jaba.692. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
4
Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences.评估用于评估强化物偏好的多重刺激呈现形式。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Winter;29(4):519-32; quiz 532-3. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-519.
5
Validity of the multiple-stimulus without replacement preference assessment for edible items.无替换多选偏好评估法在可食用物品评估中的有效性。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2020 Jul;53(3):1688-1701. doi: 10.1002/jaba.703. Epub 2020 Apr 19.
6
Web-based stimulus preference assessment and reinforcer assessment for videos.基于网络的刺激偏好评估和视频强化物评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2019 Jul;52(3):796-803. doi: 10.1002/jaba.593. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
7
The multiple-stimulus-without-replacement preference assessment tool and its predictive validity.多重无替换刺激偏好评估工具及其预测效度。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2024 Jan;57(1):226-235. doi: 10.1002/jaba.1037. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
8
Increasing the efficiency of paired-stimulus preference assessments by identifying categories of preference.通过识别偏好类别提高配对刺激偏好评估的效率。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2015 Spring;48(1):221-6. doi: 10.1002/jaba.190.
9
Evaluation of the multiple-stimulus without replacement preference assessment method using activities as stimuli.使用活动作为刺激物评估无替换多选偏好评估方法。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2009 Fall;42(3):563-74. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2009.42-563.
10
Assessing object-to-picture and picture-to-object matching as prerequisite skills for pictorial preference assessments.评估物体与图片及图片与物体的匹配,作为图片偏好评估的先决技能。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2005 Winter;38(4):543-7. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2005.161-04.

本文引用的文献

1
Preference and reinforcer efficacy of high- and low-tech items: A comparison of item type and duration of access.高科技与低科技物品的偏好及强化物效能:物品类型与使用时长的比较
J Appl Behav Anal. 2017 Apr;50(2):222-237. doi: 10.1002/jaba.383. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
2
An Evaluation of a Brief Video-Based Multiple-Stimulus Without Replacement Preference Assessment.基于视频的简短无替换多重刺激偏好评估的评价
Behav Anal Pract. 2015 Aug 13;9(2):160-4. doi: 10.1007/s40617-015-0081-0. eCollection 2016 Jun.
3
Using Computer Tablets to Assess Preference for Videos in Children with Autism.使用平板电脑评估自闭症儿童对视频的偏好。
Behav Anal Pract. 2016 Feb 1;9(1):50-3. doi: 10.1007/s40617-016-0109-0. eCollection 2016 Mar.
4
Assessing the efficacy of pictorial preference assessments for children with developmental disabilities.评估针对发育障碍儿童的图片偏好评估的有效性。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2016 Dec;49(4):848-868. doi: 10.1002/jaba.342. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
5
Comparison of edible and leisure reinforcers.可食用强化物与休闲强化物的比较。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2015 Summer;48(2):331-43. doi: 10.1002/jaba.200. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
6
Clinical decision making and preference assessment for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities.临床决策与智力和发育障碍个体的偏好评估。
Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2014 Mar;119(2):151-70. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-119.2.151.
7
Assessing preference for social interactions.评估社交互动偏好。
Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Jan;34(1):362-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2012.07.028. Epub 2012 Sep 23.
8
Using iPods(®) and iPads(®) in teaching programs for individuals with developmental disabilities: a systematic review.使用 iPods(®) 和 iPads(®) 进行发展障碍人士教学计划:系统综述。
Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Jan;34(1):147-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2012.07.027. Epub 2012 Aug 30.
9
Evaluation of the multiple-stimulus without replacement preference assessment method using activities as stimuli.使用活动作为刺激物评估无替换多选偏好评估方法。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2009 Fall;42(3):563-74. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2009.42-563.
10
Assessing object-to-picture and picture-to-object matching as prerequisite skills for pictorial preference assessments.评估物体与图片及图片与物体的匹配,作为图片偏好评估的先决技能。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2005 Winter;38(4):543-7. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2005.161-04.