• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

男男性行为者中的家族网络比例与 HIV 风险。

Family network proportion and HIV risk among black men who have sex with men.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.

出版信息

J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012 Dec 15;61(5):627-35. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e318270d3cb.

DOI:10.1097/QAI.0b013e318270d3cb
PMID:23011395
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3508259/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Black men who have sex with men (BMSM) have the highest rates of HIV in the United States. Despite increased attention to social and sexual networks as a framework for biomedical intervention, the role of family in these networks and their relationship to HIV prevention have received limited attention.

METHODS

A network sample (N = 380) of BMSM (n = 204) and their family members (n = 176) was generated through respondent-driven sampling of BMSM and elicitation of their personal networks. The proportion of personal network members who were family was calculated, and the weighted logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between this proportion and unprotected anal intercourse, sex-drug use (SDU), and group sex (GS), as well as intravention efforts to discourage these risk behaviors among their MSM social networks.

RESULTS

45.3% of respondents listed at least 1 family member in their close personal network. Greater family network proportion (having 2 or more family members in the close network) was associated with less SDU [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 0.38, 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.87] and participation in GS (AOR 0.25, 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.67). For intravention, BMSM with greater family proportion were more likely to discourage GS (AOR 3.83, 95% CI: 1.56 to 9.43) and SDU (AOR 2.18, 95% CI: 1.35 to 3.54) among their MSM friend network. Moreover, increased male family network proportion was associated with lower HIV risk and greater intravention than increased female network proportion.

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly half of BMSM have a close family member with whom they share personal information. Combination prevention interventions might be made more potent if this often overlooked component of personal networks was incorporated.

摘要

目的

在美国,与男性发生性关系的黑人男性(BMSM)的 HIV 感染率最高。尽管越来越关注社交和性网络作为生物医学干预的框架,但家庭在这些网络中的作用及其与 HIV 预防的关系受到的关注有限。

方法

通过对 BMSM 进行回应驱动抽样和个人网络的启发,生成了一个 BMSM 网络样本(N=380)(n=204)和他们的家庭成员(n=176)。计算个人网络成员中家庭成员的比例,并使用加权逻辑回归评估该比例与无保护肛交、性毒品使用(SDU)和群交(GS)的关系,以及干预措施劝阻这些风险行为在他们的 MSM 社交网络中。

结果

45.3%的受访者在他们的亲密个人网络中列出了至少 1 个家庭成员。更大的家庭网络比例(亲密网络中有 2 个或更多家庭成员)与较少的 SDU 相关[调整后的优势比(AOR)0.38,95%可信区间:0.17 至 0.87]和参与 GS(AOR 0.25,95%可信区间:0.10 至 0.67)。对于干预措施,具有更大家庭比例的 BMSM 更有可能劝阻他们的 MSM 朋友网络中的 GS(AOR 3.83,95%可信区间:1.56 至 9.43)和 SDU(AOR 2.18,95%可信区间:1.35 至 3.54)。此外,男性家庭网络比例的增加与 HIV 风险降低和干预增加有关,而女性网络比例的增加则不然。

结论

近一半的 BMSM 与他们分享个人信息的亲密家庭成员。如果将个人网络中经常被忽视的这一组成部分纳入其中,综合预防干预措施可能会更有效。

相似文献

1
Family network proportion and HIV risk among black men who have sex with men.男男性行为者中的家族网络比例与 HIV 风险。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012 Dec 15;61(5):627-35. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e318270d3cb.
2
Structural bridging network position is associated with HIV status in a younger Black men who have sex with men epidemic.结构桥接网络位置与年轻的男男性行为者中的 HIV 状态相关。
AIDS Behav. 2014 Feb;18(2):335-45. doi: 10.1007/s10461-013-0677-8.
3
Marijuana Use as a Sex-Drug is Associated with HIV Risk Among Black MSM and Their Network.在黑人男男性行为者及其社交圈中,将大麻用作性药与感染艾滋病毒的风险相关。
AIDS Behav. 2016 Mar;20(3):600-7. doi: 10.1007/s10461-015-1195-7.
4
Risky sexual networks and concentrated HIV epidemics among men who have sex with men in Wenzhou, China: a respondent-driven sampling study.中国温州男男性行为者中的高风险性行为网络与HIV集中流行:一项应答驱动抽样研究
BMC Public Health. 2015 Dec 16;15:1246. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2591-7.
5
Characteristics of men who have sex with men in southern Africa who seek sex online: a cross-sectional study.南部非洲通过网络寻求性伴侣的男男性行为者的特征:一项横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 May 25;17(5):e129. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4230.
6
HIV health center affiliation networks of black men who have sex with men: disentangling fragmented patterns of HIV prevention service utilization.男男性行为者的黑人艾滋病毒健康中心关联网络:解析艾滋病毒预防服务利用的碎片化模式。
Sex Transm Dis. 2012 Aug;39(8):598-604. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3182515cee.
7
Network mixing and network influences most linked to HIV infection and risk behavior in the HIV epidemic among black men who have sex with men.网络混合和网络影响与黑人男男性行为者中的 HIV 感染和风险行为最相关。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Jan;103(1):e28-36. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301003. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
8
Factors Associated with Inconsistent Condom Use among Men Who Have Sex with Men in Cambodia.柬埔寨男男性行为者中与不坚持使用避孕套相关的因素。
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 19;10(8):e0136114. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136114. eCollection 2015.
9
HIV prevention interventions in Chennai, India: are men who have sex with men being reached?印度钦奈的艾滋病毒预防干预措施:男男性行为者是否被覆盖?
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2009 Nov;23(11):981-6. doi: 10.1089/apc.2009.0092.
10
HIV risk, prevention, and testing behaviors among men who have sex with men--National HIV Behavioral Surveillance System, 21 U.S. cities, United States, 2008.男男性行为人群中的艾滋病毒风险、预防和检测行为——美国 21 个城市国家艾滋病毒行为监测系统,2008 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2011 Oct 28;60(14):1-34.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating Social Network Peer Effects on HIV Care Engagement Using a Fuzzy-Like Matching Approach: Cross-Sectional Secondary Analysis of the N2 Cohort Study.使用类似模糊匹配的方法研究社交网络同伴效应与艾滋病护理参与度的关系:N2队列研究的横断面二次分析
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2025 May 8;11:e64497. doi: 10.2196/64497.
2
A Social Network Theory-Based Investigation into the Characteristics of MSM in Virtual Communities.一项基于社会网络理论对虚拟社区中男男性行为者特征的调查。
AIDS Behav. 2025 Jun;29(6):1897-1909. doi: 10.1007/s10461-025-04657-3. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
3
Strategies used to reduce harms associated with fentanyl exposure among rural people who use drugs: multi-site qualitative findings from the rural opioid initiative.

本文引用的文献

1
Network mixing and network influences most linked to HIV infection and risk behavior in the HIV epidemic among black men who have sex with men.网络混合和网络影响与黑人男男性行为者中的 HIV 感染和风险行为最相关。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Jan;103(1):e28-36. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301003. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
2
Respondent-Driven Sampling: An Assessment of Current Methodology.应答者驱动抽样:当前方法评估
Sociol Methodol. 2010 Aug;40(1):285-327. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9531.2010.01223.x.
3
HIV prevention interventions to reduce racial disparities in the United States: a systematic review.
用于减少农村吸毒人群中芬太尼暴露相关危害的策略:农村阿片倡议的多地点定性研究结果。
Harm Reduct J. 2024 Aug 24;21(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-01062-2.
4
Social Network Characteristics Associated with More Frequent HIV and STI Prevention Conversations: The N2 Cohort Study in Chicago.与更频繁的 HIV 和性传播感染预防对话相关的社会网络特征:芝加哥 N2 队列研究。
AIDS Behav. 2024 Jul;28(7):2463-2475. doi: 10.1007/s10461-024-04348-5. Epub 2024 May 4.
5
How do people who use opioids express their qualities and capacities? An assessment of attitudes, behaviors, and opportunities.使用阿片类药物的人如何表现出他们的品质和能力?对态度、行为和机会的评估。
Harm Reduct J. 2024 Apr 8;21(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-00981-4.
6
Characteristics of Individuals Seen as Sources of Social Support in Populations at Increased Risk for HIV.被视为艾滋病毒感染高风险人群社会支持来源的个体的特征。
AIDS Behav. 2023 Oct;27(10):3447-3459. doi: 10.1007/s10461-023-04059-3. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
7
Latent Profile Patterns of Network-Level Norms and Associations with Individual-Level Sexual Behaviors: The N2 Cohort Study in Chicago.网络规范的潜在特征模式及其与个体性行为的关联:芝加哥 N2 队列研究。
Arch Sex Behav. 2023 Aug;52(6):2355-2372. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02555-0. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
8
Social Media Communication and Network Correlates of HIV Infection and Transmission Risks Among Black Sexual Minority Men: Cross-sectional Digital Epidemiology Study.黑人性少数男性中HIV感染与传播风险的社交媒体交流及网络关联:横断面数字流行病学研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Oct 20;6(10):e37982. doi: 10.2196/37982.
9
Social-spatial network structures and community ties of egocentric sex and confidant networks: A Chicago case study.自我中心的性网络和知己网络的社会空间网络结构和社区联系:芝加哥案例研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Dec;291:114462. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114462. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
10
Perceptions of Marijuana Decriminalization Among Young Sexual and Gender Minorities in Chicago: An Initial Measure Validation and Test of Longitudinal Associations with Use.芝加哥年轻性少数和性别少数群体对大麻非刑罪化的看法:一项初始测量验证以及与使用相关的纵向关联测试。
Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2021 Apr 15;6(2):156-164. doi: 10.1089/can.2019.0072. eCollection 2021 Apr.
减少美国种族差异的艾滋病毒预防干预措施:系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Aug;27(8):1047-67. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2036-2.
4
A comparison of the social and sexual networks of crack-using and non-crack using African American men who have sex with men.比较使用和不使用 crack 的非裔美国男男性行为者的社会和性网络。
J Urban Health. 2011 Dec;88(6):1052-62. doi: 10.1007/s11524-011-9611-4.
5
Estimated HIV incidence in the United States, 2006-2009.2006-2009 年美国估计的艾滋病毒发病率。
PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e17502. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017502. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
6
Having supportive social relationships is associated with reduced risk of unrecognized HIV infection among black and Latino men who have sex with men.拥有支持性的社会关系与降低黑人及拉丁裔男男性行为者中未被识别的 HIV 感染风险有关。
AIDS Behav. 2012 Apr;16(3):508-15. doi: 10.1007/s10461-011-0002-3.
7
Prevention of HIV-1 infection with early antiretroviral therapy.早期抗逆转录病毒疗法预防 HIV-1 感染。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Aug 11;365(6):493-505. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1105243. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
8
Does family matter to HIV-positive men who have sex with men?性取向为男男性行为的 HIV 阳性男性,家庭对他们重要吗?
J Marital Fam Ther. 2011 Jul;37(3):290-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2009.00177.x. Epub 2010 Mar 4.
9
Mental health of lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth: A developmental resiliency perspective.女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋青少年的心理健康:一种发展弹性视角。
J Gay Lesbian Soc Serv. 2011 Jan 1;23(2):204-225. doi: 10.1080/10538720.2011.561474.
10
Understanding disparities in HIV infection between black and white MSM in the United States.了解美国黑人和白人男男性行为者之间 HIV 感染的差异。
AIDS. 2011 May 15;25(8):1103-12. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3283471efa.