Risch N
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510.
Am J Hum Genet. 1990 Feb;46(2):242-53.
The results from the second paper of this series are reexamined for markers that are not completely polymorphic. A maximum lod score (MLS) criterion is defined for affected relative pairs. The expected MLS (EMLS) is calculated as a function of the marker polymorphic information content (PIC) for various values of lambda R (relative risk ratio) and different relative types by using simulations. An m-allele model with equal allele frequencies is employed. The EMLS is calculated for two sampling strategies: scheme 1, which uses pairs only, and scheme 2, which also includes additional informative relatives. For scheme 2, the percent of the maximum achievable EMLS (i.e., for a marker with a PIC of 1.0) is approximately equal to the marker PIC value for all relative types. For scheme 1, the EMLS is greatly diminished unless PIC is high, especially for distant relatives. For example, scheme 1 is not cost-effective for sibs unless PIC greater than .7; for second- and third-degree relatives, PIC must be greater than .85. Therefore, in general, it will be worthwhile to type additional relatives in linkage studies using affected pairs. The comparative value of sibs versus distant relatives depends on lambda R, recombination theta, and PIC. For large lambda R and PIC values, distant relatives are preferred. Alternatively, for smaller lambda R and PIC values, sibs are best.
本系列第二篇论文的结果针对不完全多态性的标记物进行了重新审视。为患病亲属对定义了最大似然比分数(MLS)标准。通过模拟计算了不同λR(相对风险比)值和不同亲属类型下,预期最大似然比分数(EMLS)作为标记物多态信息含量(PIC)的函数。采用了等位基因频率相等的m等位基因模型。针对两种抽样策略计算了EMLS:策略1仅使用亲属对,策略2还包括其他信息丰富的亲属。对于策略2,所有亲属类型下可达到的最大EMLS的百分比(即对于PIC为1.0的标记物)大约等于标记物PIC值。对于策略1,除非PIC较高,否则EMLS会大幅降低,尤其是对于远亲。例如,对于同胞而言,除非PIC大于0.7,否则策略1不具有成本效益;对于二级和三级亲属,PIC必须大于0.85。因此,一般来说,在使用患病对进行连锁研究时,对其他亲属进行分型是值得的。同胞与远亲的相对价值取决于λR、重组率θ和PIC。对于较大的λR和PIC值,首选远亲。或者,对于较小的λR和PIC值,同胞是最佳选择。