• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Dissociated neural correlates of quantity processing of quantifiers, numbers, and numerosities.量词、数字和数量的数量处理的分离神经关联。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Feb;35(2):444-54. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22190. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
2
The Semantic System Supports the Processing of Mathematical Principles.语义系统支持数学原理的处理。
Neuroscience. 2019 Apr 15;404:102-118. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.01.043. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
3
Neural correlates of quantity processing of Chinese numeral classifiers.汉语量词数量加工的神经关联
Brain Lang. 2018 Jan;176:11-18. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2017.10.007. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
4
Neural correlates of quantity processing of numeral classifiers.数量型名词短语加工的神经关联。
Neuropsychology. 2013 Sep;27(5):583-94. doi: 10.1037/a0033630. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
5
Neural correlates of numbers and mathematical terms.数字和数学术语的神经关联。
Neuroimage. 2012 Mar;60(1):230-40. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.12.006. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
6
'How many' and 'how much' dissociate in the parietal lobe.“多少”的概念在顶叶中分离。
Cortex. 2015 Dec;73:73-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.08.007. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
7
Developmental specialization in the right intraparietal sulcus for the abstract representation of numerical magnitude.右顶内沟在数值大小的抽象表示中的发育专业化。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Nov;22(11):2627-37. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21399.
8
rTMS over the intraparietal sulcus disrupts numerosity processing.顶内沟重复经颅磁刺激会干扰数字数量处理。
Exp Brain Res. 2007 Jun;179(4):631-42. doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0820-0. Epub 2007 Jan 11.
9
Quantifier processing can be dissociated from numerical processing: evidence from semantic dementia patients.量词处理可以与数值处理分离:语义性痴呆患者的证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2013 Sep;51(11):2172-83. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.07.003. Epub 2013 Jul 15.
10
Continuity and change in children's longitudinal neural responses to numbers.儿童对数字纵向神经反应的连续性与变化
Dev Sci. 2015 Mar;18(2):314-26. doi: 10.1111/desc.12215. Epub 2014 Jul 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Dynamic Mathematical Processing Through Symbolic, Situational, and Verbal Representations.通过符号、情境和语言表征进行动态数学处理。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2025 Mar 12;59(1):33. doi: 10.1007/s12124-025-09899-3.
2
Quantifier processing and semantic flexibility in patients with aphasia.失语症患者的量词处理与语义灵活性
Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 18;15:1328853. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1328853. eCollection 2024.
3
The interconnection of orthographic, phonetic, and semantic skills with arithmetic fluency.正字法、语音和语义技能与算术流畅性的相互联系。
Psychol Res. 2024 Nov;88(8):2320-2334. doi: 10.1007/s00426-024-02005-z. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
4
More than a piece of cake: Noun classifier processing in primary progressive aphasia.绝非易事:原发性进行性失语名词分类器加工。
Alzheimers Dement. 2024 Apr;20(4):2353-2363. doi: 10.1002/alz.13701. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
5
tDCS effects in basic symbolic number magnitude processing are not significantly lateralized.经颅直流电刺激在基本符号数字大小处理中的效应没有明显的侧化。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 6;13(1):21515. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48189-z.
6
Neural correlates of pronoun processing: An activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.代词加工的神经相关:激活似然估计元分析。
Brain Lang. 2023 Nov;246:105347. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2023.105347. Epub 2023 Oct 15.
7
Spontaneous quantitative processing in Chinese singular and plural picture naming: An event-related potentials analysis.汉语单复数图片命名中的自发量化加工:一项事件相关电位分析。
Front Neurosci. 2022 Oct 11;16:898526. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.898526. eCollection 2022.
8
Dual-tDCS over the right prefrontal cortex does not modulate stop-signal task performance.右侧前额皮质的双经颅直流电刺激不会调节停止信号任务的表现。
Exp Brain Res. 2021 Mar;239(3):811-820. doi: 10.1007/s00221-020-05995-5. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
9
So Many Are "Few," but so Few Are Also "Few" - Reduced Semantic Flexibility in bvFTD Patients.如此多的“少数”,但如此少的也是“少数”——bvFTD患者语义灵活性降低
Front Psychol. 2020 Apr 3;11:582. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00582. eCollection 2020.
10
Quantifier comprehension is linked to linguistic rather than to numerical skills. Evidence from children with Down syndrome and Williams syndrome.量词理解与语言能力而非数字能力相关联。来自唐氏综合征和威廉姆斯综合征儿童的证据。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 27;13(6):e0199743. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199743. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
The organization of brain activations in number comparison: event-related potentials and the additive-factors method.大脑在数量比较中的激活组织:事件相关电位和加因素法。
J Cogn Neurosci. 1996 Winter;8(1):47-68. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1996.8.1.47.
2
Some is not enough: quantifier comprehension in corticobasal syndrome and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia.有些还不够:皮质基底节综合征和行为变异额颞叶痴呆症中的量词理解。
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Nov;49(13):3532-41. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.005. Epub 2011 Sep 12.
3
Specialization in the human brain: the case of numbers.人类大脑的专业化:以数字为例。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2011 Jul 11;5:62. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00062. eCollection 2011.
4
Impaired verbal comprehension of quantifiers in corticobasal syndrome.皮质基底节综合征患者对量词的言语理解受损。
Neuropsychology. 2011 Mar;25(2):159-65. doi: 10.1037/a0021448.
5
Three parietal circuits for number processing.三个顶叶回路用于数字加工。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2003 May 1;20(3):487-506. doi: 10.1080/02643290244000239.
6
SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles.SUBTLEX-CH:基于电影字幕的中文词频和字频。
PLoS One. 2010 Jun 2;5(6):e10729. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010729.
7
The evolution of numerical cognition: from number neurons to linguistic quantifiers.数字认知的演变:从数字神经元到语言量词
J Neurosci. 2008 Nov 12;28(46):11819-24. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3808-08.2008.
8
Is it logical to count on quantifiers? Dissociable neural networks underlying numerical and logical quantifiers.依靠量词是否合理?数字量词和逻辑量词背后的可分离神经网络。
Neuropsychologia. 2009 Jan;47(1):104-11. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.08.015. Epub 2008 Aug 22.
9
Are numbers special? An overview of chronometric, neuroimaging, developmental and comparative studies of magnitude representation.数字特殊吗?数量表征的计时、神经成像、发展及比较研究综述。
Prog Neurobiol. 2008 Feb;84(2):132-47. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2007.11.001. Epub 2007 Nov 19.
10
Where do you know what you know? The representation of semantic knowledge in the human brain.你从何处知晓你所知道的?语义知识在人脑中的表征。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007 Dec;8(12):976-87. doi: 10.1038/nrn2277.

量词、数字和数量的数量处理的分离神经关联。

Dissociated neural correlates of quantity processing of quantifiers, numbers, and numerosities.

作者信息

Wei Wei, Chen Chuansheng, Yang Tao, Zhang Han, Zhou Xinlin

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Feb;35(2):444-54. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22190. Epub 2012 Sep 27.

DOI:10.1002/hbm.22190
PMID:23019128
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6869002/
Abstract

Quantities can be represented using either mathematical language (i.e., numbers) or natural language (i.e., quantifiers). Previous studies have shown that numerical processing elicits greater activation in the brain regions around the intraparietal sulcus (IPS) relative to other semantic processes. However, little research has been conducted to investigate whether the IPS is also critical for the semantic processing of quantifiers in natural language. In this study, 20 adults were scanned with functional magnetic resonance imaging while they performed semantic distance judgment involving six types of materials (i.e., frequency adverbs, quantity pronouns and nouns, animal names, Arabic digits, number words, and dot arrays). Conjunction analyses of brain activation showed that numbers and dot arrays elicited greater activation in the right IPS than did words (i.e., animal names) or quantifiers (i.e., frequency adverbs and quantity pronouns and nouns). Quantifiers elicited more activation in left middle temporal gyrus and inferior frontal gyrus than did numbers and dot arrays. No differences were found between quantifiers and animal names. These findings suggest that, although quantity processing for numbers and dot arrays typically relies on the right IPS region, quantity processing for quantifiers typically relies on brain regions for general semantic processing. Thus, the IPS does not appear to be the only brain region for quantity processing.

摘要

数量可以用数学语言(即数字)或自然语言(即量词)来表示。先前的研究表明,相对于其他语义处理过程,数字处理在顶内沟(IPS)周围的脑区引发更强的激活。然而,很少有研究探讨IPS对于自然语言中量词的语义处理是否也至关重要。在本研究中,20名成年人在进行涉及六种材料(即频率副词、数量代词和名词、动物名称、阿拉伯数字、数字词和点阵)的语义距离判断时接受了功能磁共振成像扫描。大脑激活的联合分析表明,数字和点阵在右侧IPS引发的激活比单词(即动物名称)或量词(即频率副词、数量代词和名词)更强。量词在左颞中回和额下回引发的激活比数字和点阵更多。在量词和动物名称之间未发现差异。这些发现表明,虽然数字和点阵的数量处理通常依赖于右侧IPS区域,但量词的数量处理通常依赖于一般语义处理的脑区。因此,IPS似乎不是数量处理的唯一脑区。