• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体外和临床获得性耐药肿瘤样本中证明了美法仑和顺铂诱导的 DNA 链间交联的“解连环”机制不同。

Evidence for different mechanisms of 'unhooking' for melphalan and cisplatin-induced DNA interstrand cross-links in vitro and in clinical acquired resistant tumour samples.

机构信息

CR-UK Drug-DNA Interactions Research Group, UCL Cancer Institute, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2012 Sep 28;12:436. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-436.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2407-12-436
PMID:23020514
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3522549/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

DNA interstrand cross-links (ICLs) are critical lesions produced by several cancer chemotherapy agents including platinum drugs and nitrogen mustards. We have previously shown in haematological (multiple myeloma) and solid tumours (ovarian cancer) that clinical sensitivity to such agents can result from a defect in DNA ICL processing leading to their persistence. Conversely, enhanced repair can result in clinical acquired resistance following chemotherapy. The repair of ICLs is complex but it is assumed that the 'unhooking' step is common to all ICLs.

METHODS

Using a modification of the single cell gel electrophoresis (Comet) assay we measured the formation and unhooking of melphalan and cisplatin-induced ICLs in cell lines and clinical samples. DNA damage response in the form of γ-H2AX foci formation and the formation of RAD51 foci as a marker of homologous recombination were also determined. Real-time PCR of 84 genes involved in DNA damage signalling pathways was also examined pre- and post-treatment.

RESULTS

Plasma cells from multiple myeloma patients known to be clinically resistant to melphalan showed significant unhooking of melphalan-induced ICLs at 48 hours, but did not unhook cisplatin-induced ICLs. In ovarian cancer cells obtained from patients following platinum-based chemotherapy, unhooking of cisplatin-induced ICLs was observed at 48 hours, but no unhooking of melphalan-induced ICLs. In vitro, A549 cells were proficient at unhooking both melphalan and cisplatin-induced ICLs. γ-H2AX foci formation closely followed the formation of ICLs for both drugs, and rapidly declined following the peak of formation. RPMI8226 cells unhooked melphalan, but not cisplatin-induced ICLs. In these cells, although cross-links form with cisplatin, the γ-H2AX response is weak. In A549 cells, addition of 3nM gemcitabine resulted in complete inhibition of cisplatin-induced ICL unhooking but no effect on repair of melphalan ICLs. The RAD51 foci response was both drug and cell line specific. Real time PCR studies highlighted differences in the damage response to melphalan and cisplatin following equi-ICL forming doses.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that the mechanisms by which melphalan and cisplatin-induced ICLs are 'unhooked' in vitro are distinct, and the mechanisms of clinical acquired resistance involving repair of ICLs, are drug specific.

摘要

背景

DNA 链间交联(ICLs)是几种癌症化疗药物(包括铂类药物和氮芥类药物)产生的关键损伤。我们之前在血液学(多发性骨髓瘤)和实体瘤(卵巢癌)中表明,对这些药物的临床敏感性可能源于导致其持续存在的 DNA ICL 处理缺陷。相反,增强修复会导致化疗后获得临床耐药性。ICL 的修复很复杂,但假定“脱钩”步骤对所有 ICL 都是通用的。

方法

我们使用单细胞凝胶电泳(彗星)试验的改良方法测量了细胞系和临床样本中氨甲喋呤和顺铂诱导的 ICL 的形成和脱钩。还测定了 DNA 损伤反应的形式,即 γ-H2AX 焦点的形成和 RAD51 焦点的形成,作为同源重组的标志物。还在治疗前和治疗后检查了涉及 DNA 损伤信号通路的 84 个基因的实时 PCR。

结果

已知对氨甲喋呤临床耐药的多发性骨髓瘤患者的浆细胞在 48 小时时显示出氨甲喋呤诱导的 ICL 的明显脱钩,但不能脱钩顺铂诱导的 ICL。在接受铂类化疗的卵巢癌细胞中,在 48 小时时观察到顺铂诱导的 ICL 的脱钩,但未观察到氨甲喋呤诱导的 ICL 的脱钩。在体外,A549 细胞能够有效地脱钩氨甲喋呤和顺铂诱导的 ICL。γ-H2AX 焦点的形成与两种药物的 ICL 形成密切相关,并在形成高峰后迅速下降。RPMI8226 细胞可脱钩氨甲喋呤,但不能脱钩顺铂诱导的 ICL。在这些细胞中,尽管顺铂形成交联,但 γ-H2AX 反应较弱。在 A549 细胞中,添加 3nM 吉西他滨可完全抑制顺铂诱导的 ICL 脱钩,但对氨甲喋呤 ICL 的修复没有影响。RAD51 焦点反应具有药物和细胞系特异性。实时 PCR 研究强调了在等 ICL 形成剂量下对氨甲喋呤和顺铂的损伤反应的差异。

结论

这些数据表明,体外氨甲喋呤和顺铂诱导的 ICL 脱钩的机制是不同的,涉及 ICL 修复的临床获得性耐药机制是药物特异性的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd74/3522549/3002ba028a81/1471-2407-12-436-6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd74/3522549/c37771496790/1471-2407-12-436-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd74/3522549/852cc8449565/1471-2407-12-436-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd74/3522549/faca0dcce1af/1471-2407-12-436-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd74/3522549/dc93e67f5136/1471-2407-12-436-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd74/3522549/e6f40332fa4b/1471-2407-12-436-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd74/3522549/3002ba028a81/1471-2407-12-436-6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd74/3522549/c37771496790/1471-2407-12-436-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd74/3522549/852cc8449565/1471-2407-12-436-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd74/3522549/faca0dcce1af/1471-2407-12-436-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd74/3522549/dc93e67f5136/1471-2407-12-436-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd74/3522549/e6f40332fa4b/1471-2407-12-436-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd74/3522549/3002ba028a81/1471-2407-12-436-6.jpg

相似文献

1
Evidence for different mechanisms of 'unhooking' for melphalan and cisplatin-induced DNA interstrand cross-links in vitro and in clinical acquired resistant tumour samples.体外和临床获得性耐药肿瘤样本中证明了美法仑和顺铂诱导的 DNA 链间交联的“解连环”机制不同。
BMC Cancer. 2012 Sep 28;12:436. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-436.
2
Histone H2AX phosphorylation as a molecular pharmacological marker for DNA interstrand crosslink cancer chemotherapy.组蛋白H2AX磷酸化作为DNA链间交联癌症化疗的分子药理学标志物。
Biochem Pharmacol. 2008 Jul 1;76(1):19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2008.03.025. Epub 2008 Apr 16.
3
Increased γ-H2AX and Rad51 DNA Repair Biomarker Expression in Human Cell Lines Resistant to the Chemotherapeutic Agents Nitrogen Mustard and Cisplatin.对化疗药物氮芥和顺铂耐药的人细胞系中γ-H2AX和Rad51 DNA修复生物标志物表达增加。
Chemotherapy. 2014;60(5-6):310-20. doi: 10.1159/000430086. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
4
An inverse switch in DNA base excision and strand break repair contributes to melphalan resistance in multiple myeloma cells.DNA 碱基切除和链断裂修复的反向开关导致多发性骨髓瘤细胞对美法仑耐药。
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e55493. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055493. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
5
Enhanced repair of DNA interstrand crosslinking in ovarian cancer cells from patients following treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy.铂类化疗治疗后患者卵巢癌细胞中DNA链间交联修复增强。
Br J Cancer. 2007 Oct 8;97(7):927-33. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603973. Epub 2007 Sep 11.
6
Xrcc3 induces cisplatin resistance by stimulation of Rad51-related recombinational repair, S-phase checkpoint activation, and reduced apoptosis.Xrcc3通过刺激Rad51相关的重组修复、S期检查点激活和减少细胞凋亡来诱导顺铂耐药。
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2005 Aug;314(2):495-505. doi: 10.1124/jpet.105.084053. Epub 2005 Apr 20.
7
Chemosensitivity of primary human fibroblasts with defective unhooking of DNA interstrand cross-links.DNA链间交联解钩缺陷的原代人成纤维细胞的化学敏感性
Exp Cell Res. 2007 Feb 15;313(4):753-60. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2006.11.007. Epub 2006 Nov 18.
8
Inhibition of carboplatin-induced DNA interstrand cross-link repair by gemcitabine in patients receiving these drugs for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.吉西他滨抑制铂类耐药卵巢癌患者接受顺铂治疗时的 DNA 链间交联修复。
Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Oct 1;16(19):4899-905. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-0832. Epub 2010 Aug 18.
9
The FA/BRCA pathway is involved in melphalan-induced DNA interstrand cross-link repair and accounts for melphalan resistance in multiple myeloma cells.FA/BRCA通路参与美法仑诱导的DNA链间交联修复,并导致多发性骨髓瘤细胞对美法仑耐药。
Blood. 2005 Jul 15;106(2):698-705. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-11-4286. Epub 2005 Mar 31.
10
Co-inhibition of Pol η and ATR sensitizes cisplatin-resistant non-small cell lung cancer cells to cisplatin by impeding DNA damage repair.聚腺苷二磷酸核糖聚合酶 η(Pol η)和 ATM 激酶(ATR)的双重抑制通过阻碍 DNA 损伤修复,使顺铂耐药的非小细胞肺癌细胞对顺铂敏感。
Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2018 Aug;39(8):1359-1372. doi: 10.1038/aps.2017.187. Epub 2018 May 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Mimicking Retinoblastoma Treatment With Repeated Topotecan or Melphalan Develops Cross-Resistance to Classic Agents But Not to Repurposed Drugs.用反复给予拓扑替康或美法仑模拟视网膜母细胞瘤治疗会产生对经典药物的交叉耐药性,但对重新利用的药物不会产生交叉耐药性。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2024 Dec 2;65(14):14. doi: 10.1167/iovs.65.14.14.
2
Repair of genomic interstrand crosslinks.基因组链间交联的修复。
DNA Repair (Amst). 2024 Sep;141:103739. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2024.103739. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
3
Newly Synthesized Melphalan Analogs Induce DNA Damage and Mitotic Catastrophe in Hematological Malignant Cancer Cells.

本文引用的文献

1
The Fanconi anaemia pathway orchestrates incisions at sites of crosslinked DNA.范可尼贫血通路调控交联 DNA 部位的切口。
J Pathol. 2012 Jan;226(2):326-37. doi: 10.1002/path.3002. Epub 2011 Oct 25.
2
Human SNM1A and XPF-ERCC1 collaborate to initiate DNA interstrand cross-link repair.人源 SNM1A 和 XPF-ERCC1 协作启动 DNA 链间交联修复。
Genes Dev. 2011 Sep 1;25(17):1859-70. doi: 10.1101/gad.15699211.
3
DNA interstrand crosslink repair and cancer.DNA 链间交联修复与癌症。
新合成的美法仑类似物在血液恶性癌细胞中诱导 DNA 损伤和有丝分裂灾难。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Nov 17;23(22):14258. doi: 10.3390/ijms232214258.
4
Genome Instability in Multiple Myeloma: Facts and Factors.多发性骨髓瘤中的基因组不稳定:事实与因素
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Nov 26;13(23):5949. doi: 10.3390/cancers13235949.
5
The Role of Specific ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters in the Acquired Resistance to Pyrrolobenzodiazepine Dimer-Containing Antibody-Drug Conjugates.特定三磷酸腺苷结合盒转运蛋白在含吡咯苯并二氮䓬二聚体抗体药物偶联物获得性耐药中的作用。
Mol Cancer Ther. 2020 Sep;19(9):1856-1865. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-20-0222. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
6
Proteometabolomics of Melphalan Resistance in Multiple Myeloma.多发性骨髓瘤中美法仑耐药的蛋白质代谢组学
Methods Mol Biol. 2019;1996:273-296. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9488-5_21.
7
Antioxidant Defenses Confer Resistance to High Dose Melphalan in Multiple Myeloma Cells.抗氧化防御赋予多发性骨髓瘤细胞对高剂量美法仑的抗性。
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Mar 28;11(4):439. doi: 10.3390/cancers11040439.
8
Short half-life of HPV16 E6 and E7 mRNAs sensitizes HPV16-positive tonsillar cancer cell line HN26 to DNA-damaging drugs.HPV16E6 和 E7mRNA 的短半衰期使 HPV16 阳性扁桃体癌细胞系 HN26 对 DNA 损伤药物敏感。
Int J Cancer. 2019 Jan 15;144(2):297-310. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31918. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
9
Pre-clinical pharmacology and mechanism of action of SG3199, the pyrrolobenzodiazepine (PBD) dimer warhead component of antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) payload tesirine.SG3199 的临床前药理学和作用机制,SG3199 是抗体药物偶联物(ADC)有效载荷药物 tesirine 的吡咯苯并二氮杂䓬(PBD)二聚体弹头部分。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 11;8(1):10479. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28533-4.
10
The DNA damage response activates HPV16 late gene expression at the level of RNA processing.DNA 损伤反应通过 RNA 加工水平激活 HPV16 晚期基因表达。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Jun 1;46(10):5029-5049. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky227.
Nat Rev Cancer. 2011 Jun 24;11(7):467-80. doi: 10.1038/nrc3088.
4
The development of pyrrolobenzodiazepines as antitumour agents.吡咯并苯二氮䓬类化合物作为抗肿瘤药物的发展。
Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2011 Jun;20(6):733-44. doi: 10.1517/13543784.2011.573477. Epub 2011 Apr 4.
5
Phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of SJG-136, a novel DNA sequence selective minor groove cross-linking agent, in advanced solid tumors.SJG-136 是一种新型的 DNA 序列选择性小沟交联剂,在晚期实体瘤中的 I 期药代动力学和药效学研究。
Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Jun 1;17(11):3794-802. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2056. Epub 2011 Feb 23.
6
Inhibition of carboplatin-induced DNA interstrand cross-link repair by gemcitabine in patients receiving these drugs for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.吉西他滨抑制铂类耐药卵巢癌患者接受顺铂治疗时的 DNA 链间交联修复。
Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Oct 1;16(19):4899-905. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-0832. Epub 2010 Aug 18.
7
Measurement of DNA interstrand crosslinking in individual cells using the Single Cell Gel Electrophoresis (Comet) assay.使用单细胞凝胶电泳(彗星)试验测量单个细胞中的DNA链间交联。
Methods Mol Biol. 2010;613:267-82. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-418-0_17.
8
DNA interstrand crosslink repair in mammalian cells.哺乳动物细胞中的DNA链间交联修复
J Cell Physiol. 2009 Sep;220(3):569-73. doi: 10.1002/jcp.21811.
9
Dysfunctional homologous recombination mediates genomic instability and progression in myeloma.功能失调的同源重组介导骨髓瘤中的基因组不稳定和进展。
Blood. 2009 Mar 5;113(10):2290-7. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-05-089193. Epub 2008 Dec 2.
10
Histone H2AX phosphorylation as a molecular pharmacological marker for DNA interstrand crosslink cancer chemotherapy.组蛋白H2AX磷酸化作为DNA链间交联癌症化疗的分子药理学标志物。
Biochem Pharmacol. 2008 Jul 1;76(1):19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2008.03.025. Epub 2008 Apr 16.