Richardson Jane S, Richardson David C
Department of Biochemistry, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Biopolymers. 2013 Mar;99(3):170-82. doi: 10.1002/bip.22108. Epub 2012 Sep 29.
Macromolecular crystal structures are among the best of scientific data, providing detailed insight into these complex and biologically important molecules with a relatively low level of error and subjectivity. However, there are two notable problems with getting the most information from them. The first is that the models are not perfect: there is still opportunity for improving them, and users need to evaluate whether the local reliability in a structure is up to answering their question of interest. The second is that protein and nucleic acid molecules are highly complex and individual, inherently handed and three-dimensional, and the cooperative and subtle interactions that govern their detailed structure and function are not intuitively evident. Thus there is a real need for graphical representations and descriptive classifications that enable molecular 3D literacy. We have spent our career working to understand these elegant molecules ourselves, and building tools to help us and others determine and understand them better. The Protein Data Bank (PDB) has of course been vital and central to this undertaking. Here we combine some history of our involvement as depositors, illustrators, evaluators, and end-users of PDB structures with commentary on how best to study and draw scientific inferences from them.
大分子晶体结构是最好的科学数据之一,能以相对较低的误差和主观性,深入洞察这些复杂且具有生物学重要性的分子。然而,要从这些结构中获取最多信息存在两个显著问题。第一个问题是模型并不完美:仍有改进的空间,用户需要评估结构中的局部可靠性是否足以回答他们感兴趣的问题。第二个问题是蛋白质和核酸分子高度复杂且独特,本质上具有手性和三维结构,支配其详细结构和功能的协同且微妙的相互作用并非直观可见。因此,确实需要图形表示和描述性分类来实现分子三维素养。我们一生都致力于亲自理解这些精妙的分子,并构建工具来帮助我们自己和他人更好地确定和理解它们。蛋白质数据库(PDB)在这项工作中当然至关重要且处于核心地位。在此,我们将我们作为PDB结构的存入者、阐释者、评估者和最终用户的一些参与历史,与关于如何最好地研究这些结构并从中得出科学推论的评论结合起来。