• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

教师在高保真模拟中的舒适度。

Instructor comfort level in high-fidelity simulation.

作者信息

Harder B Nicole, Ross Carolyn J M, Paul Pauline

机构信息

Simulation Learning Centre, Faculty of Nursing, University of Manitoba, 89 Curry Place, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2N2.

出版信息

Nurse Educ Today. 2013 Oct;33(10):1242-5. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.09.003. Epub 2012 Sep 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2012.09.003
PMID:23025906
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The literature in the use of simulation in nursing education has expanded significantly over the past 5-10 years. What it is like as an instructor who facilitates this experience is largely unexplored. This paper is part of a larger ethnographic study, and represents findings related to the comfort level of instructors facilitating in high-fidelity simulation (HFS).

OBJECTIVES

The question of what is it like to engage in simulated clinical experiences as an instructor is presented in this paper.

DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS

Twenty instructors participated in two separate focus groups and two instructors participated in individual interviews. The average years of nursing experience for this group was over 20 years, whereas the number of years of experience as a clinical instructor was less than five years.

METHODS

Ethical approval was obtained from two academic institutions. A focused ethnography was conducted and included two terms of participant observations, recorded field notes, individual interviews and focus groups. Data was coded and then sorted for themes related to the instructor experience.

RESULTS

The primary results focus on the comfort level of instructors in HFS, and what instructors believe this meant to student learning in HFS.

CONCLUSIONS

What the instructor does during HFS and how they feel about their ability to facilitate HFS has a perceived effect on student learning.

摘要

背景

在过去5至10年中,护理教育中模拟教学的相关文献显著增加。然而,作为促进这种教学体验的教师,其实际情况在很大程度上尚未得到探索。本文是一项规模更大的人种学研究的一部分,呈现了与教师在高保真模拟(HFS)教学中的舒适度相关的研究结果。

目的

本文探讨了作为教师参与模拟临床体验是怎样的。

设计与参与者

20名教师参加了两个独立的焦点小组,2名教师接受了个人访谈。该组教师的平均护理经验超过20年,而作为临床教师的经验年限则少于5年。

方法

获得了两所学术机构的伦理批准。进行了一次聚焦人种学研究,包括两个学期的参与观察、记录的实地笔记、个人访谈和焦点小组。对数据进行编码,然后分类整理出与教师教学体验相关的主题。

结果

主要结果聚焦于教师在高保真模拟教学中的舒适度,以及教师认为这对高保真模拟教学中学生学习的意义。

结论

教师在高保真模拟教学期间的行为以及他们对自身促进高保真模拟教学能力的感受,被认为会对学生学习产生影响。

相似文献

1
Instructor comfort level in high-fidelity simulation.教师在高保真模拟中的舒适度。
Nurse Educ Today. 2013 Oct;33(10):1242-5. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.09.003. Epub 2012 Sep 29.
2
Characteristics of effective simulated clinical experience instructors: interviews with undergraduate nursing students.有效模拟临床经验教师的特征:对本科护生的访谈。
J Nurs Educ. 2010 Oct;49(10):569-72. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20100730-04. Epub 2010 Jul 30.
3
High-fidelity patient simulation: considerations for effective learning.高保真患者模拟:有效学习的考量因素
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2010 Sep-Oct;31(5):309-13.
4
Developing an understanding of research-based nursing pedagogy among clinical instructors: a qualitative study.临床教师对基于研究的护理教学法的理解:一项定性研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Nov;34(11):1352-6. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2014.03.011. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
5
Getting a head start: high-fidelity, simulation-based operating room team training of interprofessional students.提前起步:基于高保真模拟的跨专业学生手术室团队培训。
J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Jan;218(1):140-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.09.006. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
6
Nursing students' perception of high-fidelity simulation activity instead of clinical placement: A qualitative study.护理专业学生对高仿真模拟活动而非临床实习的认知:一项定性研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Apr;39:16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.01.015. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
7
Comparative study of baccalaureate nursing student self-efficacy before and after simulation.本科护理学生模拟前后自我效能的比较研究
Comput Inform Nurs. 2012 Mar;30(3):142-7. doi: 10.1097/NCN.0b013e3182388936.
8
Enhancing nursing knowledge using high-fidelity simulation.利用高保真模拟提升护理知识。
J Nurs Educ. 2012 Jan;51(1):9-15. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20111116-01. Epub 2011 Nov 16.
9
Evaluating high-fidelity human simulators and standardized patients in an undergraduate nursing health assessment course.评估本科护理健康评估课程中的高保真人体模拟器和标准化病人。
Nurse Educ Today. 2012 May;32(4):448-52. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.04.011. Epub 2011 May 11.
10
An exploration of ruling relations and how they organize and regulate nursing education in the high-fidelity patient simulation laboratory.探究统治关系以及它们如何在高仿真患者模拟实验室中组织和规范护理教育。
Nurs Inq. 2010 Mar;17(1):58-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1800.2009.00484.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Gender and Assigned Role Influences Medical Students´ Learning Experience in Interprofessional Team Training Simulations.性别与指定角色对医学生在跨专业团队培训模拟中的学习体验产生影响。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2017 Feb 10;6:28. doi: 10.15694/mep.2017.000028. eCollection 2017.
2
Faculty Development Approaches for Life Support Courses: A Scoping Review.生命支持课程教师发展方法:范围综述。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Jun 7;11(11):e025661. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.025661. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
3
Method matters: impact of in-scenario instruction on simulation-based teamwork training.
方法很重要:情景内指导对基于模拟的团队协作培训的影响
Adv Simul (Lond). 2017 Nov 28;2:25. doi: 10.1186/s41077-017-0059-9. eCollection 2017.
4
Cultural Norms of Clinical Simulation in Undergraduate Nursing Education.本科护理教育中临床模拟的文化规范
Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2015 Feb 17;2:2333393615571361. doi: 10.1177/2333393615571361. eCollection 2015 Jan-Dec.
5
Foundational Elements of Applied Simulation Theory: Development and Implementation of a Longitudinal Simulation Educator Curriculum.应用模拟理论的基础要素:纵向模拟教育者课程的开发与实施
Cureus. 2017 Jan 27;9(1):e1002. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1002.
6
Comparison of high- and low equipment fidelity during paediatric simulation team training: a case control study.儿科模拟团队培训中高低设备保真度的比较:一项病例对照研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Oct 18;14:221. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-221.