School of Nursing and Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Nurs Outlook. 2013 Mar-Apr;61(2):109-16. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2012.08.001. Epub 2012 Oct 1.
The nursing profession has seen a dramatic rise in the number of schools offering both DNP and PhD nursing programs. Information is limited on the impact of this parallel approach in doctoral education on the quality and scope of scholarly interactions or institutional culture.The authors studied collaboration characteristics across the DNP and PhD programs of a research-intensive university school of nursing, before and after programmatic enhancements. An IRB-approved online survey was delivered to faculty and students of both programs at baseline and one year after curricular changes. Response rates were 70% and 74%, respectively. The responses were analyzed by using social network analysis and descriptive statistics to characterize the number and strength of connections between and within student groups, and between students and faculty. At baseline, the flow of communication was centralized primarily through faculty. At Time 2, density of links between students increased and network centralization decreased, suggesting more distributed communication. This nonlinear quantitative approach may be a useful addition to the evaluation strategies for doctoral education initiatives.
护理专业的学校提供博士和 DNP 护理课程的数量急剧增加。关于这种博士教育的并行方法对学术交流的质量和范围或机构文化的影响,信息有限。作者研究了一所研究型大学护理学院的 DNP 和 PhD 课程在课程强化前后的合作特点。在课程改革之前和之后,向两个项目的教师和学生提供了经 IRB 批准的在线调查。响应率分别为 70%和 74%。使用社会网络分析和描述性统计来分析响应,以描述学生群体之间以及学生和教师之间的连接数量和强度。在基线时,沟通的流程主要通过教师集中进行。在时间 2 时,学生之间的联系密度增加,网络集中化程度降低,表明沟通更加分散。这种非线性定量方法可能是博士教育计划评估策略的有用补充。