• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将强化物位置和质量的预期作为鸽子条件性辨别线索

Expectancies of reinforcer location and quality as cues for a conditional discrimination in pigeons.

作者信息

Williams D A, Butler M M, Overmier J B

机构信息

Psychology Department, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1990 Jan;16(1):3-13.

PMID:2303792
Abstract

Experiment 1 demonstrated that reliably correlating different reinforcer locations (top vs. bottom) with sample stimuli markedly enhanced the performance of White Carneaux pigeons in a spatial conditional discrimination. This differential outcome effect was more evident at longer retention intervals. In Experiment 2, pigeons were given the opportunity to learn about two redundant reinforcer features--location (top vs. bottom) and quality (grain vs. chow). Which reinforcer feature exerted control over choosing depended on task structure. In the congruent task, where pecks to the top key operated the top feeder and pecks to the bottom key operated the bottom feeder, reinforcer location exerted predominant control. In the incongruent task, where pecks to the top key operated the bottom feeder and vice versa, reinforcer quality exerted exclusive control. These results have implications for the nature of reinforcer representations in instrumental learning.

摘要

实验1表明,将不同的强化物位置(顶部与底部)与样本刺激可靠地关联起来,显著提高了白卡诺鸽在空间条件辨别任务中的表现。这种差异结果效应在更长的保留间隔时更为明显。在实验2中,鸽子有机会了解两种冗余的强化物特征——位置(顶部与底部)和质量(谷粒与食物)。哪种强化物特征对选择产生控制取决于任务结构。在一致任务中,啄顶部按键操作顶部喂食器,啄底部按键操作底部喂食器,强化物位置发挥主要控制作用。在不一致任务中,啄顶部按键操作底部喂食器,反之亦然,强化物质量发挥唯一控制作用。这些结果对工具性学习中强化物表征的性质具有启示意义。

相似文献

1
Expectancies of reinforcer location and quality as cues for a conditional discrimination in pigeons.将强化物位置和质量的预期作为鸽子条件性辨别线索
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1990 Jan;16(1):3-13.
2
Effects of differential reinforcement expectancies on successive matching-to-sample performance in pigeons.差异强化预期对鸽子连续样本匹配表现的影响。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1981 Oct;7(4):394-412.
3
Control of matching by differential outcome expectancies in the absence of differential sample-outcome associations: a serial compound view.在不存在差异样本-结果关联的情况下,通过差异结果预期来控制匹配:一种序列复合观点。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2005 Oct;31(4):449-66. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.31.4.449.
4
Effect of reinforcer devaluation on discriminative control of instrumental behavior.强化物贬值对工具性条件行为辨别性控制的影响。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1990 Jan;16(1):40-7.
5
Scratch and match: pigeons learn matching and oddity with gravel stimuli.抓挠与匹配:鸽子通过沙砾刺激学习匹配和奇异性。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1994 Jan;20(1):108-12.
6
Expectancy mediation of concurrent conditional discriminations.同时性条件辨别中的期望中介作用。
Am J Psychol. 1982 Winter;95(4):571-80.
7
A relational differential outcomes effect: pigeons can classify outcomes as "good" and "better".一种关系型差异结果效应:鸽子可以将结果分为“好”和“更好”。
Anim Cogn. 2010 Mar;13(2):359-65. doi: 10.1007/s10071-009-0286-0. Epub 2009 Sep 25.
8
Feature-short and feature-long discrimination learning in the pigeon: conditional control of a two-event temporal map.鸽子的特征短与特征长辨别学习:双事件时间图谱的条件控制
Behav Processes. 2009 Jan;80(1):80-9. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.10.001. Epub 2008 Oct 11.
9
Directed forgetting of elements in compound samples.复合样本中元素的定向遗忘
J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Jul;58(1):135-45. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.58-135.
10
Stimulus-outcome interactions during instrumental discrimination learning by rats and humans.大鼠和人类在工具性辨别学习过程中的刺激-结果相互作用。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2007 Jan;33(1):1-11. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.33.1.1.

引用本文的文献

1
Spatial working memory is enhanced in children by differential outcomes.不同的结果会增强儿童的空间工作记忆。
Sci Rep. 2015 Nov 24;5:17112. doi: 10.1038/srep17112.
2
A delay-specific differential outcomes effect in delayed matching to sample.延迟样本匹配中的延迟特定差异结果效应。
Learn Behav. 2015 Sep;43(3):217-27. doi: 10.3758/s13420-015-0174-1.
3
Psychological and neural mechanisms of experimental extinction: a selective review.实验性消退的心理和神经机制:选择性综述。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2014 Feb;108:38-51. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2013.09.016. Epub 2013 Oct 6.
4
Coding of Stimuli by Animals: Retrospection, Prospection, Episodic Memory and Future Planning.动物对刺激的编码:回顾、展望、情景记忆与未来规划。
Learn Motiv. 2010 Nov 1;41(4):225-240. doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2010.08.001.
5
Pavlovian biconditional discrimination learning in the C57BL/6J mouse.C57BL/6J小鼠的巴甫洛夫双条件辨别学习
Behav Processes. 2012 Jun;90(2):278-86. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2012.02.017. Epub 2012 Mar 23.
6
A differential-outcome effect in pigeons using spatial hedonically nondifferential outcomes.使用空间享乐无差异结果的鸽子中的差异结果效应。
Learn Behav. 2011 Mar;39(1):68-78. doi: 10.3758/s13420-011-0021-y.
7
Radial Maze Analog for Pigeons: Evidence for Flexible Coding Strategies May Result from Faulty Assumptions.鸽子的放射状迷宫模拟:灵活编码策略的证据可能源于错误假设。
Learn Motiv. 2008 Nov;39(4):285-295. doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2008.04.002.
8
A differential-outcomes effect using hedonically nondifferential outcomes with delayed matching to sample by pigeons.
Learn Behav. 2009 May;37(2):161-6. doi: 10.3758/LB.37.2.161.
9
Sample and comparison location as factors in matching acquisition, transfer, and acquired equivalence.作为匹配习得、迁移和习得等效性因素的样本与比较位置
Learn Behav. 2007 Nov;35(4):252-61. doi: 10.3758/bf03206431.
10
An investigation of the differential-outcomes effect within sessions.在会议期间调查差异结果的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 May;61(3):389-406. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.61-389.