• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

强化物贬值对工具性条件行为辨别性控制的影响。

Effect of reinforcer devaluation on discriminative control of instrumental behavior.

作者信息

Colwill R M, Rescorla R A

机构信息

University of Pennsylvania.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1990 Jan;16(1):40-7.

PMID:2303793
Abstract

Two experiments examined the effect of reinforcer devaluation on the ability of a discriminative stimulus (Sd) to control instrumental behavior in Sprague-Dawley rats. In Experiment 1 reinforcer devaluation reduced, but did not eliminate, the ability of the Sd to control performance of the original response and to transfer its control to a new response trained with the same reinforcer. The effect of devaluation was more complete in Experiment 2, in which the reinforcer was delivered directly into the oral cavity. However, retraining the response with a different reinforcer partially restored the ability of the Sd to control performance of that response. These results suggest that an Sd may not augment its trained responses when the reinforcer has been completely devalued but may promote responses with which it shares a reinforcer, as long as those responses are associated with some reinforcer that retains its value. The implications of these results for the way that discriminative stimuli control instrumental behavior are discussed.

摘要

两项实验研究了强化物贬值对斯普拉格-道利大鼠中辨别性刺激(Sd)控制工具性行为能力的影响。在实验1中,强化物贬值降低了但并未消除Sd控制原反应表现以及将其控制转移至用相同强化物训练的新反应的能力。在实验2中,强化物直接注入口腔,贬值的影响更彻底。然而,用不同强化物对反应进行再训练可部分恢复Sd控制该反应表现的能力。这些结果表明,当强化物完全贬值时,Sd可能不会增强其已训练的反应,但只要这些反应与保留其价值的某种强化物相关联,Sd可能会促进与之共享强化物的反应。讨论了这些结果对辨别性刺激控制工具性行为方式的意义。

相似文献

1
Effect of reinforcer devaluation on discriminative control of instrumental behavior.强化物贬值对工具性条件行为辨别性控制的影响。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1990 Jan;16(1):40-7.
2
Relations between Pavlovian-instrumental transfer and reinforcer devaluation.巴甫洛夫式工具性转移与强化物贬值之间的关系。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2004 Apr;30(2):104-17. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.30.2.104.
3
Bidirectional instrumental conditioning.双向工具性条件作用
Q J Exp Psychol B. 1996 Nov;49(4):289-306. doi: 10.1080/713932637.
4
Passage of time leaves response-outcome associations intact.时间的推移使反应-结果关联保持不变。
Behav Processes. 2006 Mar;72(1):91-9. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.01.003. Epub 2006 Feb 2.
5
Inhibitory discriminative control is specific to both the response and the reinforcer.抑制性辨别控制对反应和强化物两者而言都是特定的。
Q J Exp Psychol B. 1989 Aug;41(3):225-42.
6
Signalling and incentive processes in instrumental reinforcer devaluation.工具性强化物贬值中的信号与激励过程。
Q J Exp Psychol B. 1992 Nov;45(4):285-301.
7
Instrumental performance following a shift in primary motivation depends on incentive learning.在主要动机发生转变后,工具性表现取决于激励学习。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1992 Jul;18(3):236-50.
8
Control of instrumental performance by Pavlovian and instrumental stimuli.巴甫洛夫式刺激和工具性刺激对工具性表现的控制。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1994 Jan;20(1):44-50.
9
Evidence for an association between the discriminative stimulus and the response-outcome association in instrumental learning.在工具性学习中,辨别性刺激与反应-结果关联之间存在关联的证据。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1990 Oct;16(4):326-34.
10
Facilitation of instrumental behavior by a Pavlovian appetitive conditioned stimulus.经典条件性食欲刺激对工具性行为的促进作用。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1983 Jul;9(3):225-47.

引用本文的文献

1
The reward positivity is insensitive to reinforcer devaluation.奖励积极性对强化物贬值不敏感。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2025 Jun 5. doi: 10.3758/s13415-025-01306-z.
2
Activating group II metabotropic glutamate receptors in the basolateral amygdala inhibits increases in reward seeking triggered by discriminative stimuli in rats.激活大鼠基底外侧杏仁核中的II型代谢型谷氨酸受体可抑制由辨别性刺激引发的奖赏寻求行为增加。
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2025 Jun 6;28(6). doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyaf030.
3
Goal-direction and habit in human and nonhuman behavioral sequences (behavior chains).
人类和非人类行为序列(行为链)中的目标导向与习惯
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2025 Apr;51(2):73-91. doi: 10.1037/xan0000395.
4
The devilish details affecting TDRL models in dopamine research.多巴胺研究中影响临时残疾评定量表(TDRL)模型的棘手细节。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2025 May;29(5):434-447. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2025.02.001. Epub 2025 Feb 26.
5
Triggered temptations: A new procedure to compare reward-seeking behaviour induced by discriminative and conditioned stimuli in rats.触发诱惑:一种比较大鼠中由辨别性刺激和条件性刺激诱发的奖赏寻求行为的新方法。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2025 Feb 24. doi: 10.1007/s00213-025-06764-4.
6
Stimulus conditions that promote habitual control.促进习惯性控制的刺激条件。
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 5;14(1):30303. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-81309-x.
7
Delineating anticipatory arousal from reward consumption: evaluating fixed-intervals in cocaine seeking-taking response chains.区分预期唤醒与奖励消耗:评估可卡因觅药-服药反应链中的固定间隔。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2025 Mar;242(3):593-615. doi: 10.1007/s00213-024-06711-9. Epub 2024 Nov 8.
8
High stakes slow responding, but do not help overcome Pavlovian biases in humans.高风险反应慢,但无助于克服人类的巴甫洛夫偏见。
Learn Mem. 2024 Sep 16;31(8). doi: 10.1101/lm.054017.124. Print 2024 Aug.
9
Neither Amphetamine nor Sub-Anesthetic Ketamine Treatment during Adolescence Impairs Devaluation in Rats Tested during Adulthood.无论是在青春期给予安非他命还是亚麻醉剂量氯胺酮处理,都不会损害成年期大鼠的价值贬损。
J Integr Neurosci. 2024 Apr 18;23(4):83. doi: 10.31083/j.jin2304083.
10
Habit and persistence.习惯和坚持。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2024 Jan;121(1):88-96. doi: 10.1002/jeab.894. Epub 2023 Dec 27.