• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跨学科研究团队的属性:文献综述

Attributes of interdisciplinary research teams: a comprehensive review of the literature.

作者信息

Lakhani Jahan, Benzies Karen, Hayden K Alix

机构信息

Royal College of Surgeons, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Clin Invest Med. 2012 Oct 6;35(5):E226.

PMID:23043705
Abstract

PURPOSE

To solve large complex health-related problems, there has been a progressive movement towards interdisciplinary research teams; however, there has been minimal investigation into the attributes of successful teams. The purpose of this literature review was to examine the attributes that are important for the effective functioning of these teams.

METHOD

Literature from medicine, nursing and psychology databases, published between 1990 and 2010, was reviewed.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Thematic organization of the findings identified seven attributes important to effective interdisciplinary research teams: team purpose, goals, leadership, communication, cohesion, mutual respect and reflection. These attributes are described in depth.

CONCLUSION

Identification of these attributes could form the basis of a new measure to monitor interdisciplinary research team effectiveness, identify weaknesses and promote team development.

摘要

目的

为了解决与健康相关的大型复杂问题,人们逐渐朝着跨学科研究团队的方向发展;然而,对于成功团队的特质却鲜有研究。本文献综述的目的是探讨对这些团队有效运作至关重要的特质。

方法

回顾了1990年至2010年间发表于医学、护理和心理学数据库的文献。

主要发现

研究结果的主题组织确定了对有效的跨学科研究团队至关重要的七个特质:团队目的、目标、领导力、沟通、凝聚力、相互尊重和反思。对这些特质进行了深入描述。

结论

识别这些特质可为监测跨学科研究团队有效性、识别弱点并促进团队发展的新措施奠定基础。

相似文献

1
Attributes of interdisciplinary research teams: a comprehensive review of the literature.跨学科研究团队的属性:文献综述
Clin Invest Med. 2012 Oct 6;35(5):E226.
2
Defragmenting care: testing an intervention to increase the effectiveness of interdisciplinary health care teams.优化护理:测试一项提高跨学科医疗团队有效性的干预措施。
Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2010 Jun;22(2):271-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2010.03.006. Epub 2010 May 14.
3
Diagnosing and improving functioning in interdisciplinary health care teams.诊断并改善跨学科医疗团队的运作。
Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2012 Jul-Sep;31(3):195-207. doi: 10.1097/HCM.0b013e3182619d48.
4
Team working in intensive care: current evidence and future endeavors.重症监护中的团队合作:当前证据与未来努力。
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2010 Dec;16(6):643-8. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32833e9731.
5
Reducing the failure risk of interdisciplinary healthcare teams.降低跨学科医疗团队的失败风险。
Crit Care Nurs Q. 2009 Apr-Jun;32(2):81-8. doi: 10.1097/CNQ.0b013e3181a27af2.
6
Developing effective interdisciplinary teams.组建高效的跨学科团队。
Nurs N Z. 2003 Oct;9(9):21-3.
7
A pilot for understanding interdisciplinary teams in rehabilitation practice.一项关于理解康复实践中跨学科团队的试点研究。
Rehabil Nurs. 2013 May-Jun;38(3):142-52. doi: 10.1002/rnj.75.
8
[Validation of the IPC65 questionnaire: a tool to measure interdisciplinarity in clinical practice].
Sante Publique. 2013 Nov-Dec;25(6):763-73.
9
Teamwork and patient safety in dynamic domains of healthcare: a review of the literature.医疗保健动态领域中的团队合作与患者安全:文献综述
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009 Feb;53(2):143-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01717.x.
10
Review: Toward realizing the potential of diversity in composition of interprofessional health care teams: an examination of the cognitive and psychosocial dynamics of interprofessional collaboration.综述:为了实现跨专业医疗团队组成多样性的潜力:对跨专业合作的认知和心理社会动态的考察。
Med Care Res Rev. 2010 Feb;67(1):3-26. doi: 10.1177/1077558709338478. Epub 2009 Jul 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Leading Practices to Safeguard the Mental Health of Investigators and Trainees in Research Teams.
New Solut. 2025 Nov;35(3):304-315. doi: 10.1177/10482911251362477. Epub 2025 Aug 12.
2
Bringing Together Robotics, Neuroscience, and Psychology: Lessons Learned From an Interdisciplinary Project.融合机器人技术、神经科学与心理学:跨学科项目的经验教训
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Mar 29;15:630789. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.630789. eCollection 2021.
3
Evaluating research investment and impact at a regional Australian Hospital and Health Service: a programme theory and conceptual framework.评估澳大利亚地区医院和卫生局的研究投资和影响:一个方案理论和概念框架。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Mar 6;18(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-0542-y.
4
Successful International Medical Education Research Collaboration.成功的国际医学教育研究合作
J Grad Med Educ. 2019 Aug;11(4 Suppl):187-189. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-18-01061.
5
Reflections on an interdisciplinary collaboration to inform public understanding of climate change, mitigation, and impacts.关于气候变化、减缓措施和影响的公众理解的跨学科合作的思考。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Apr 16;116(16):7676-7683. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1803726115. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
6
Knowledge mobilisation for chronic disease prevention: the case of the Australian Prevention Partnership Centre.知识转化在慢性病预防中的应用:以澳大利亚预防伙伴关系中心为例。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Nov 16;16(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0379-9.
7
Team science as interprofessional collaborative research practice: a systematic review of the science of team science literature.作为跨专业协作研究实践的团队科学:对团队科学文献的系统综述
J Investig Med. 2017 Jan;65(1):15-22. doi: 10.1136/jim-2016-000216. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
8
Setting a research agenda for interprofessional education and collaborative practice in the context of United States health system reform.在美国医疗体系改革背景下制定跨专业教育与协作实践的研究议程。
J Interprof Care. 2016;30(1):7-14. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2015.1040875. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
9
Preterm Birth and Healthy Outcomes Team: the science and strategy of team-based investigation.早产与健康结局团队:基于团队的调查的科学与策略
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-S1-S1. Epub 2013 Jan 31.