1] Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA [2] Programs in Neurogenetics and Human Genetics and Genomics, Child Study Center and Departments of Psychiatry and Genetics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Mol Psychiatry. 2013 Oct;18(10):1090-5. doi: 10.1038/mp.2012.138. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
Copy number variants (CNVs) have a major role in the etiology of autism spectrum disorders (ASD), and several of these have reached statistical significance in case-control analyses. Nevertheless, current ASD cohorts are not large enough to detect very rare CNVs that may be causative or contributory (that is, risk alleles). Here, we use a tiered approach, in which clinically significant CNVs are first identified in large clinical cohorts of neurodevelopmental disorders (including but not specific to ASD), after which these CNVs are then systematically identified within well-characterized ASD cohorts. We focused our initial analysis on 48 recurrent CNVs (segmental duplication-mediated 'hotspots') from 24 loci in 31 516 published clinical cases with neurodevelopmental disorders and 13 696 published controls, which yielded a total of 19 deletion CNVs and 11 duplication CNVs that reached statistical significance. We then investigated the overlap of these 30 CNVs in a combined sample of 3955 well-characterized ASD cases from three published studies. We identified 73 deleterious recurrent CNVs, including 36 deletions from 11 loci and 37 duplications from seven loci, for a frequency of 1 in 54; had we considered the ASD cohorts alone, only 58 CNVs from eight loci (24 deletions from three loci and 34 duplications from five loci) would have reached statistical significance. In conclusion, until there are sufficiently large ASD research cohorts with enough power to detect very rare causative or contributory CNVs, data from larger clinical cohorts can be used to infer the likely clinical significance of CNVs in ASD.
拷贝数变异(CNVs)在自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的病因中起重要作用,其中一些在病例对照分析中达到了统计学意义。然而,目前的 ASD 队列还不够大,无法检测到可能是致病或致病的非常罕见的 CNVs(即风险等位基因)。在这里,我们使用分层方法,首先在包括但不限于 ASD 的神经发育障碍的大型临床队列中识别出临床上有意义的 CNVs,然后在经过良好特征描述的 ASD 队列中系统地识别这些 CNVs。我们的初始分析集中在 24 个神经发育障碍的 31516 个已发表病例和 13696 个已发表对照中 24 个基因座的 48 个反复出现的 CNV(片段复制介导的“热点”)上,总共产生了 19 个缺失 CNV 和 11 个复制 CNV 达到了统计学意义。然后,我们在来自三个已发表研究的 3955 个经过良好特征描述的 ASD 病例的合并样本中研究了这些 30 个 CNV 的重叠情况。我们鉴定了 73 个有害的反复出现的 CNV,包括 11 个基因座的 36 个缺失和 7 个基因座的 37 个复制,频率为 1 比 54;如果我们仅考虑 ASD 队列,只有 8 个基因座的 58 个 CNV(来自 3 个基因座的 24 个缺失和来自 5 个基因座的 34 个复制)将达到统计学意义。总之,在有足够大的 ASD 研究队列和足够的力量来检测非常罕见的致病或致病的 CNVs 之前,可以使用来自更大的临床队列的数据来推断 CNVs 在 ASD 中的可能临床意义。