Nothwehr Faryle K, Snetselaar Linda, Dawson Jeffrey, Schultz Ulrike
University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Health Promot Pract. 2013 Jan;14(1):132-8. doi: 10.1177/1524839912437368. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
This study tested a novel intervention to influence restaurant customer ordering behavior, with measurements at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months postintervention in four owner-operated restaurants in the Midwest. A sample of 141 to 370 customers was surveyed at each time point. The response rate was 70% to 84% with 59% women, 98% White, and a mean age of 53 years. Table signs listed changes customers might consider, for example, asking for meat broiled instead of fried or requesting smaller portions. Customer surveys measured program reach and effectiveness. Owner interviews measured perceptions of program burden and customer response. Order slips were analyzed for evidence of changes in ordering. Window signs were noticed by 40%, 48%, and 45% of customers at each follow-up, respectively. Table signs were noticed by 67%, 71%, and 69% of customers, respectively. Of those, 34% at each time point stated that the signs influenced their order. Examples of how orders were influenced were elicited. Order slip data not only did not show significant changes but was also found to be an inadequate measure for the intervention. Owners reported no concerns or complaints. This intervention resulted in small but positive behavior changes among a portion of customers. Because of its simplicity and acceptability, it has great potential for dissemination.
本研究测试了一种新颖的干预措施,以影响餐厅顾客的点餐行为,在中西部地区的四家自营餐厅进行了基线测量以及干预后3个月、6个月和12个月的测量。在每个时间点对141至370名顾客进行了抽样调查。回复率为70%至84%,其中女性占59%,白人占98%,平均年龄为53岁。桌签列出了顾客可能考虑的变化,例如要求将肉烤着做而不是炸着做,或者要求提供更小的份量。顾客调查衡量了项目的覆盖范围和有效性。店主访谈衡量了对项目负担和顾客反应的看法。分析点菜单以获取点餐变化的证据。在每次随访中,分别有40%、48%和45%的顾客注意到了橱窗标识。分别有67%、71%和69%的顾客注意到了桌签。其中,每个时间点有34%的顾客表示这些标识影响了他们的点餐。还引出了订单受到影响的示例。点菜单数据不仅没有显示出显著变化,而且还被发现是衡量该干预措施的不充分指标。店主报告没有担忧或投诉。这种干预措施在一部分顾客中带来了虽小但积极的行为改变。由于其简单性和可接受性,它具有很大的推广潜力。