Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Nov 1;53(12):7440-8. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-9612.
To evaluate electrically evoked phosphene thresholds (EPTs) in healthy subjects and in patients with retinal disease and to assess repeatability and possible correlations with common ophthalmologic tests.
In all, 117 individuals participated: healthy subjects (n = 20) and patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP, n = 30), Stargardt's disease (STG, n = 14), retinal artery occlusion (RAO, n = 20), nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION, n = 16), and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG, n = 17). EPTs were determined at 3, 6, 9, 20, 40, 60, and 80 Hz with 5 + 5-ms biphasic current pulses using DTL electrodes. Subjects were examined twice (test-retest range: 1-6 weeks). An empirical model was developed to describe the current-frequency relationship of EPTs. Visual acuity, visual field (kinetic + static), electrophysiology (RP, RAO, STG: Ganzfeld-electroretinography [ERG]/multifocal-ERG; POAG: pattern-ERG; NAION: VEP), slit-lamp biomicroscopy, fundus examination, and tonometry were assessed.
EPTS varied between disease groups (20 HZ: healthy subjects: 0.062 ± 0.038 mA; STG: 0.102 ± 0.097 mA; POAG: 0.127 ± 0.09 mA; NAION: 0.244 ± 0.126 mA; RP: 0.371 ± 0.223 mA; RAO: 0.988 ± 1.142 mA). In all groups EPTs were lowest at 20 Hz. In patients with retinal diseases and across all frequencies EPTs were significantly higher than those in healthy subjects, except in STG at 20 Hz (P = 0.09) and 40 Hz (P = 0.17). Test-retest difference at 20 Hz was 0.006 mA in the healthy group and 0.003-0.04 mA in disease groups.
Considering the fast, safe, and reliable practicability of EPT testing, this test might be used more often under clinical circumstances. Determination of EPTs could be potentially useful in elucidation of the progress of ophthalmologic diseases, either in addition to standard clinical assessment or under conditions in which these standard tests cannot be used meaningfully. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00804102.).
评估健康受试者和视网膜疾病患者的电诱发光幻阈值(EPT),并评估其可重复性和与常见眼科检查的可能相关性。
共有 117 人参与:健康受试者(20 人)和视网膜色素变性(RP,30 人)、斯塔加特病(STG,14 人)、视网膜动脉阻塞(RAO,20 人)、非动脉炎性前部缺血性视神经病变(NAION,16 人)和原发性开角型青光眼(POAG,17 人)。使用 DTL 电极以 5 + 5-ms 双相电流脉冲在 3、6、9、20、40、60 和 80 Hz 下确定 EPT。受试者接受了两次检查(测试-复测范围:1-6 周)。开发了一个经验模型来描述 EPT 的电流-频率关系。评估了视力、视野(动态+静态)、电生理学(RP、RAO、STG:全视野-视网膜电图/多焦点视网膜电图;POAG:图形视网膜电图;NAION:VEP)、裂隙灯生物显微镜检查、眼底检查和眼压测量。
EPT 在疾病组之间存在差异(20 Hz:健康受试者:0.062 ± 0.038 mA;STG:0.102 ± 0.097 mA;POAG:0.127 ± 0.09 mA;NAION:0.244 ± 0.126 mA;RP:0.371 ± 0.223 mA;RAO:0.988 ± 1.142 mA)。在所有组中,EPT 在 20 Hz 时最低。在视网膜疾病患者中,与健康受试者相比,所有频率的 EPT 均显著升高,除了 STG 在 20 Hz(P = 0.09)和 40 Hz(P = 0.17)。健康组在 20 Hz 时的测试-复测差异为 0.006 mA,疾病组为 0.003-0.04 mA。
鉴于 EPT 测试的快速、安全和可靠实用性,在临床情况下可能会更频繁地使用该测试。EPT 的测定可能有助于阐明眼科疾病的进展,无论是作为标准临床评估的补充,还是在这些标准测试无法有意义地使用的情况下。(临床试验.gov 编号,NCT00804102.)。