Gokhale Shankar T, Dwarakanath C D
Department of Periodontics, Rama Dental College and Hospital, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2012 Apr;16(2):247-52. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.99270.
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of a bovine derived xenograft Bio-Oss™ and to compare with open flap debridement in human infrabony periodontal defects.
Twelve healthy patients (5 males, 7 females; aged 30-50 years), with no systemic disease with moderate to severe periodontitis were treated. Surgically defects were included only if presence of two or more vertical osseous defects as verified by radiographs with associated probing pocket depth of ≥5.0 mm following non-surgical therapy. Final selection included 24 defects. The defects were randomly assigned treatment with bovine derived xenograft Bio-Oss™ as experimental sites or open flap debridement as control sites. Soft tissue and hard tissue measurements were recorded on the day of surgery and six months post-operatively.
The results showed significant difference statistically between experimental and control sites in all measurements. Soft tissue measurements for the experimental sites included probing pocket depth reduction of 4.33±0.651 mm and attachment gain of 2.92±0.9003 mm, while the control sites showed a probing pocket depth reduction of 2.92±0.669 mm and a attachment gain of 0.583±0.515 mm. Osseous measurements showed bone fill of 1.936±1.046 mm (54.065±12.642%) for experimental sites and 0.02±0.01 mm (0.534±0.384%) for the control sites. Defect resolution was 50.75% for the experimental sites and 5.45% for the control sites.
Bio-Oss™ is a bone graft material of considerable promise. However, further long term clinical studies with histological evaluation are warranted.
本研究旨在评估一种牛源异种移植物Bio-Oss™的疗效,并将其与人类骨下袋牙周缺损的开放性翻瓣清创术进行比较。
对12名无全身疾病、患有中度至重度牙周炎的健康患者(5名男性,7名女性;年龄30 - 50岁)进行治疗。仅当经X光片证实存在两个或更多垂直骨缺损且非手术治疗后相关探诊袋深度≥5.0 mm时,才纳入手术缺损病例。最终选定24个缺损部位。这些缺损部位被随机分配接受牛源异种移植物Bio-Oss™治疗作为试验部位,或接受开放性翻瓣清创术作为对照部位。在手术当天及术后六个月记录软组织和硬组织测量数据。
所有测量结果显示,试验部位和对照部位之间在统计学上存在显著差异。试验部位的软组织测量结果包括探诊袋深度减少4.33±0.651 mm,附着获得2.92±0.9003 mm,而对照部位探诊袋深度减少2.92±0.669 mm,附着获得0.583±0.515 mm。骨组织测量结果显示,试验部位骨填充为1.936±1.046 mm(54.065±12.642%),对照部位为0.02±0.01 mm(0.534±0.384%)。试验部位的缺损修复率为50.75%,对照部位为5.45%。
Bio-Oss™是一种很有前景的骨移植材料。然而,有必要进行进一步的长期临床研究并进行组织学评估。