Community Medicine Department, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Iran.
Health Soc Care Community. 2013 Jan;21(1):98-103. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2012.01091.x. Epub 2012 Oct 11.
Glycaemic control is an essential component in diabetes management. There is growing attention on the protective effects of social capital on health, where social capital comprises features of society that facilitate co-operation for mutual benefit. The aim of this study was to investigate its role as a social determinant of health in the glycaemic control of diabetes mellitus. A cross-sectional study was conducted in a diabetes care charity institute, Isfahan, Iran from July 2010 to September 2010. Based on the level of HbA1c, all patients were divided into two groups: HbA1c level ≤ 7 as controlled diabetes and HbA1c level > 7 as uncontrolled diabetes. Sixty patients were randomly selected from each group (controlled diabetes and uncontrolled diabetes) and all agreed to participate. Social capital was measured using the Integrated Questionnaire for the Measurement of Social Capital (SC-IQ). The mean age of participants in the controlled diabetes group was 51.3 (SD: 7.8) years and 50.1(SD: 7.2) in the uncontrolled group. The mean social capital score was 185.1 (CI 95% 181.4-188.6) in the controlled group and 175.4 (CI 95% 171.8-178.8) in the uncontrolled group. There was a significant negative correlation between empowerment and political action and trust and solidarity dimensions and the level of HbA1c. In multiple regression analysis, trust and solidarity and empowerment and political action were significant predictors of the HbA1c. The results of this study suggest that social participation, trust, and empowerment and political action may determine how effectively the patient's diabetes has been managed. This initial finding warrants subsequent experimental investigations designed to identify strategies that can be used to foster the creation of social capital to improve diabetes control.
血糖控制是糖尿病管理的重要组成部分。社会资本对健康的保护作用越来越受到关注,社会资本包含了促进互利合作的社会特征。本研究旨在探讨其作为社会决定因素在糖尿病患者血糖控制中的作用。2010 年 7 月至 9 月,在伊朗伊斯法罕的一家糖尿病护理慈善机构进行了一项横断面研究。根据 HbA1c 水平,将所有患者分为两组:HbA1c 水平≤7 为血糖控制良好,HbA1c 水平>7 为血糖控制不佳。从每个组(血糖控制良好和血糖控制不佳)中随机选择 60 名患者(血糖控制良好和血糖控制不佳),所有患者均同意参与。使用综合社会资本测量问卷(SC-IQ)测量社会资本。血糖控制良好组的参与者平均年龄为 51.3(SD:7.8)岁,血糖控制不佳组为 50.1(SD:7.2)岁。血糖控制良好组的平均社会资本评分为 185.1(95%CI 181.4-188.6),血糖控制不佳组为 175.4(95%CI 171.8-178.8)。赋权和政治行动以及信任和团结维度与 HbA1c 水平呈显著负相关。在多元回归分析中,信任和团结以及赋权和政治行动是 HbA1c 的显著预测因子。本研究结果表明,社会参与、信任、赋权和政治行动可能决定患者的糖尿病管理效果如何。这一初步发现需要进一步的实验研究来确定可以用来促进社会资本创造以改善糖尿病控制的策略。