Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
J Abnorm Psychol. 2013 Feb;122(1):281-94. doi: 10.1037/a0030133. Epub 2012 Oct 15.
There has been substantial recent interest in the development of a quantitative, empirically based model of psychopathology. However, the majority of pertinent research has focused on analyses of diagnoses, as described in current official nosologies. This is a significant limitation because existing diagnostic categories are often heterogeneous. In the current research, we aimed to redress this limitation of the existing literature, and to directly compare the fit of categorical, continuous, and hybrid (i.e., combined categorical and continuous) models of syndromes derived from indicators more fine-grained than diagnoses. We analyzed data from a large representative epidemiologic sample (the 2007 Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing; N = 8,841). Continuous models provided the best fit for each syndrome we observed (distress, obsessive compulsivity, fear, alcohol problems, drug problems, and psychotic experiences). In addition, the best fitting higher-order model of these syndromes grouped them into three broad spectra: Internalizing, Externalizing, and Psychotic Experiences. We discuss these results in terms of future efforts to refine emerging empirically based, dimensional-spectrum model of psychopathology, and to use the model to frame psychopathology research more broadly.
近年来,人们对开发一种基于实证的精神病理学定量模型产生了浓厚的兴趣。然而,大多数相关研究都集中在当前官方分类学中所描述的诊断分析上。这是一个显著的局限性,因为现有的诊断类别往往是异质的。在当前的研究中,我们旨在纠正现有文献的这一局限性,并直接比较源自比诊断更精细指标的综合征的分类、连续和混合(即分类和连续相结合)模型的拟合度。我们分析了来自一个大型代表性流行病学样本(2007 年澳大利亚国家心理健康和幸福感调查;N=8841)的数据。对于我们观察到的每种综合征,连续模型都提供了最佳的拟合度(困扰、强迫观念、恐惧、酒精问题、药物问题和精神病体验)。此外,这些综合征的最佳拟合高阶模型将它们分为三个广泛的谱系:内化、外化和精神病体验。我们根据未来的努力讨论这些结果,以进一步完善新兴的基于实证的、维度谱模型的精神病理学,并更广泛地使用该模型来构建精神病理学研究。