Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030-4095, USA.
Blood. 2012 Dec 6;120(24):4840-5. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-06-436055. Epub 2012 Oct 15.
We reviewed the outcome of 671 patients 65 years of age or older with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated at our institution between 2000 and 2010 with intensive chemotherapy (n = 557) or azacitidine- or decitabine-based therapy (n = 114). Both groups were balanced according to cytogenetics and performance status. The complete response rates with chemotherapy and epigenetic therapy were 42% and 28%, respectively (P = .001), and the 8-week mortality 18% and 11%, respectively (P = .075). Two-year relapse-free survival rates (28% vs 39%, P = .843) and median survival (6.7 vs 6.5 months, P = .413) were similar in the 2 groups. Multivariate analysis identified older age, adverse cytogenetics, poor performance status, elevated creatinine, peripheral blood and BM blasts, and hemoglobin, but not type of AML therapy, as independent prognostic factors for survival. No outcome differences were observed according to cytogenetics, FLT3 mutational status, age, or performance status by therapy type. Decitabine was associated with improved median overall survival compared with azacitidine (5.5 vs 8.8 months, respectively, P = .03). Survival after failure of intensive chemotherapy, azacitidine, or decitabine was more favorable in patients who had previously received decitabine (1.1 vs 0.9 vs 3.1 months, respectively, P = .109). The results of the present study show that epigenetic therapy is associated with similar survival rates as intensive chemotherapy in older patients with newly diagnosed AML. The studies reviewed are registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as 2009-0172 (NCT00926731) and 2009-0217 (NCT00952588).
我们回顾了 2000 年至 2010 年期间在我院接受强化化疗(n = 557)或阿扎胞苷或地西他滨为基础治疗(n = 114)的 671 例年龄在 65 岁及以上的新发急性髓系白血病(AML)患者的治疗结果。两组患者根据细胞遗传学和表现状态进行了平衡。化疗和表观遗传学治疗的完全缓解率分别为 42%和 28%(P =.001),8 周死亡率分别为 18%和 11%(P =.075)。两组 2 年无复发生存率(28%比 39%,P =.843)和中位生存期(6.7 比 6.5 个月,P =.413)相似。多变量分析确定年龄较大、不良细胞遗传学、较差的表现状态、肌酐升高、外周血和骨髓原始细胞增多以及血红蛋白,但不是 AML 治疗类型,是生存的独立预后因素。根据细胞遗传学、FLT3 突变状态、年龄或表现状态,按治疗类型观察到无生存差异。与阿扎胞苷相比,地西他滨与改善的中位总生存期相关(分别为 5.5 个月和 8.8 个月,P =.03)。与强化化疗、阿扎胞苷或地西他滨失败后相比,先前接受地西他滨治疗的患者生存更有利(分别为 1.1 个月、0.9 个月和 3.1 个月,P =.109)。本研究结果表明,表观遗传学治疗与老年新发 AML 患者强化化疗的生存率相似。审查的研究在 www.clinicaltrials.gov 上注册为 2009-0172(NCT00926731)和 2009-0217(NCT00952588)。