Miga Erin M, Gdula Julie Ann, Allen Joseph P
Department of Psychology, University of Virginia.
Soc Dev. 2012 Aug 1;21(3):446-460. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2011.00636.x. Epub 2011 Dec 29.
This study examined the associations between reasoning during interparental conflict and autonomous adolescent conflict negotiation with peers over time. Participants included 133 adolescents and their parents, peers, and romantic partners in a multi-method, multiple reporter, longitudinal study. Interparental reasoning at adolescent age 13 predicted greater autonomy and relatedness in observed adolescent-peer conflict one year later and lower levels of autonomy undermining during observed romantic partner conflict five years later. Interparental reasoning also predicted greater satisfaction and affection in adolescent romantic relationships seven years later. Findings suggest that autonomy promoting behaviors exhibited in the interparental context may influence adolescents' own more autonomous approaches to subsequent peer and romantic conflict. Possible explanatory models are discussed, including social learning theory and attachment theory.
本研究考察了父母间冲突时的推理方式与青少年自主性同伴冲突协商能力随时间变化的关联。在一项多方法、多报告者的纵向研究中,参与者包括133名青少年及其父母、同伴和恋爱伴侣。13岁青少年时期父母间的推理方式,预测了一年后观察到的青少年与同伴冲突中更高的自主性和亲密性,以及五年后观察到的恋爱伴侣冲突中更低的自主性破坏水平。父母间的推理方式还预测了七年后青少年恋爱关系中更高的满意度和情感。研究结果表明,父母间情境中表现出的促进自主性的行为,可能会影响青少年在随后与同伴及恋爱冲突中采取更自主的方式。文中讨论了可能的解释模型,包括社会学习理论和依恋理论。