Department of Educational Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Education, LEARN! Institute, VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Front Psychol. 2012 Oct 18;3:429. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00429. eCollection 2012.
The OECD's Brain and Learning project (2002) emphasized that many misconceptions about the brain exist among professionals in the field of education. Though these so-called "neuromyths" are loosely based on scientific facts, they may have adverse effects on educational practice. The present study investigated the prevalence and predictors of neuromyths among teachers in selected regions in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. A large observational survey design was used to assess general knowledge of the brain and neuromyths. The sample comprised 242 primary and secondary school teachers who were interested in the neuroscience of learning. It would be of concern if neuromyths were found in this sample, as these teachers may want to use these incorrect interpretations of neuroscience findings in their teaching practice. Participants completed an online survey containing 32 statements about the brain and its influence on learning, of which 15 were neuromyths. Additional data was collected regarding background variables (e.g., age, sex, school type). Results showed that on average, teachers believed 49% of the neuromyths, particularly myths related to commercialized educational programs. Around 70% of the general knowledge statements were answered correctly. Teachers who read popular science magazines achieved higher scores on general knowledge questions. More general knowledge also predicted an increased belief in neuromyths. These findings suggest that teachers who are enthusiastic about the possible application of neuroscience findings in the classroom find it difficult to distinguish pseudoscience from scientific facts. Possessing greater general knowledge about the brain does not appear to protect teachers from believing in neuromyths. This demonstrates the need for enhanced interdisciplinary communication to reduce such misunderstandings in the future and establish a successful collaboration between neuroscience and education.
经合组织的大脑与学习项目(2002 年)强调,教育领域的许多专业人士对大脑存在许多误解。尽管这些所谓的“神经神话”是基于科学事实,但它们可能对教育实践产生不利影响。本研究调查了英国和荷兰选定地区教师中神经神话的流行程度和预测因素。采用大型观察性调查设计来评估大脑和神经神话的一般知识。样本包括 242 名对学习神经科学感兴趣的小学和中学教师。如果在这个样本中发现神经神话,那将令人担忧,因为这些教师可能希望在他们的教学实践中使用这些对神经科学发现的错误解释。参与者完成了一项在线调查,其中包含 32 个关于大脑及其对学习影响的陈述,其中 15 个是神经神话。还收集了关于背景变量(例如,年龄、性别、学校类型)的数据。结果表明,教师平均相信 49%的神经神话,特别是与商业化教育计划有关的神话。大约 70%的一般知识陈述是正确的。阅读科普杂志的教师在一般知识问题上的得分更高。更多的一般知识也预示着对神经神话的信仰增加。这些发现表明,热衷于将神经科学发现应用于课堂的教师很难将伪科学与科学事实区分开来。对大脑有更多的一般了解似乎并不能保护教师免受相信神经神话的影响。这表明需要加强跨学科交流,以减少未来的这种误解,并在神经科学和教育之间建立成功的合作。