Suppr超能文献

教育神经神话:教师误解的流行率和预测因素。

Neuromyths in Education: Prevalence and Predictors of Misconceptions among Teachers.

机构信息

Department of Educational Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Education, LEARN! Institute, VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2012 Oct 18;3:429. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00429. eCollection 2012.

Abstract

The OECD's Brain and Learning project (2002) emphasized that many misconceptions about the brain exist among professionals in the field of education. Though these so-called "neuromyths" are loosely based on scientific facts, they may have adverse effects on educational practice. The present study investigated the prevalence and predictors of neuromyths among teachers in selected regions in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. A large observational survey design was used to assess general knowledge of the brain and neuromyths. The sample comprised 242 primary and secondary school teachers who were interested in the neuroscience of learning. It would be of concern if neuromyths were found in this sample, as these teachers may want to use these incorrect interpretations of neuroscience findings in their teaching practice. Participants completed an online survey containing 32 statements about the brain and its influence on learning, of which 15 were neuromyths. Additional data was collected regarding background variables (e.g., age, sex, school type). Results showed that on average, teachers believed 49% of the neuromyths, particularly myths related to commercialized educational programs. Around 70% of the general knowledge statements were answered correctly. Teachers who read popular science magazines achieved higher scores on general knowledge questions. More general knowledge also predicted an increased belief in neuromyths. These findings suggest that teachers who are enthusiastic about the possible application of neuroscience findings in the classroom find it difficult to distinguish pseudoscience from scientific facts. Possessing greater general knowledge about the brain does not appear to protect teachers from believing in neuromyths. This demonstrates the need for enhanced interdisciplinary communication to reduce such misunderstandings in the future and establish a successful collaboration between neuroscience and education.

摘要

经合组织的大脑与学习项目(2002 年)强调,教育领域的许多专业人士对大脑存在许多误解。尽管这些所谓的“神经神话”是基于科学事实,但它们可能对教育实践产生不利影响。本研究调查了英国和荷兰选定地区教师中神经神话的流行程度和预测因素。采用大型观察性调查设计来评估大脑和神经神话的一般知识。样本包括 242 名对学习神经科学感兴趣的小学和中学教师。如果在这个样本中发现神经神话,那将令人担忧,因为这些教师可能希望在他们的教学实践中使用这些对神经科学发现的错误解释。参与者完成了一项在线调查,其中包含 32 个关于大脑及其对学习影响的陈述,其中 15 个是神经神话。还收集了关于背景变量(例如,年龄、性别、学校类型)的数据。结果表明,教师平均相信 49%的神经神话,特别是与商业化教育计划有关的神话。大约 70%的一般知识陈述是正确的。阅读科普杂志的教师在一般知识问题上的得分更高。更多的一般知识也预示着对神经神话的信仰增加。这些发现表明,热衷于将神经科学发现应用于课堂的教师很难将伪科学与科学事实区分开来。对大脑有更多的一般了解似乎并不能保护教师免受相信神经神话的影响。这表明需要加强跨学科交流,以减少未来的这种误解,并在神经科学和教育之间建立成功的合作。

相似文献

1
Neuromyths in Education: Prevalence and Predictors of Misconceptions among Teachers.
Front Psychol. 2012 Oct 18;3:429. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00429. eCollection 2012.
2
Pre-service Science Teachers' Neuroscience Literacy: Neuromyths and a Professional Understanding of Learning and Memory.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Feb 14;13:20. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00020. eCollection 2019.
3
Neuromyths in Music Education: Prevalence and Predictors of Misconceptions among Teachers and Students.
Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 24;8:629. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00629. eCollection 2017.
4
Why do teachers believe educational neuromyths?
Trends Neurosci Educ. 2020 Dec;21:100145. doi: 10.1016/j.tine.2020.100145. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
5
Dispelling the Myth: Training in Education or Neuroscience Decreases but Does Not Eliminate Beliefs in Neuromyths.
Front Psychol. 2017 Aug 10;8:1314. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01314. eCollection 2017.
6
Educational neuromyths and instructional practices: The case of inclusive education teachers in Hong Kong.
Trends Neurosci Educ. 2024 Mar;34:100221. doi: 10.1016/j.tine.2024.100221. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
7
Brain Knowledge and the Prevalence of Neuromyths among Prospective Teachers in Greece.
Front Psychol. 2017 May 29;8:804. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00804. eCollection 2017.
8
Neuromyths: Misconceptions about neurodevelopment by Italian teachers.
Trends Neurosci Educ. 2024 Mar;34:100219. doi: 10.1016/j.tine.2023.100219. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
9
A cross-sectional study of neuromyths among teachers in a Caribbean nation.
Trends Neurosci Educ. 2021 Jun;23:100155. doi: 10.1016/j.tine.2021.100155. Epub 2021 Apr 17.
10
The Persistence of Neuromyths in the Educational Settings: A Systematic Review.
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 12;11:591923. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.591923. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Neuroscience Exposure as a Predictor of Teaching Self-Efficacy.
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2025 May 16;15(5):86. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe15050086.
2
A Personal Perspective on Philosophy of Teaching: The Clinical Learning Environment, Teaching Session and Assessment.
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2025 Mar 13;12:23821205241312824. doi: 10.1177/23821205241312824. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3
Neuroscience Literacy and Academic Outcomes: Insights from a University Student Population.
Brain Sci. 2025 Jan 4;15(1):44. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15010044.
4
Why does the brain matter for education?
Br J Educ Psychol. 2025 Jun;95(2):303-320. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12727. Epub 2024 Dec 4.
5
The Effect of Correcting Neuromyths on Students' and Teachers' Later Reasoning.
J Intell. 2024 Oct 1;12(10):98. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12100098.
6
False Beliefs about Mathematics in Spanish Pre-Service Teachers and Relations with Math Anxiety.
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2024 Jun 28;14(7):1913-1926. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe14070127.
7
Is it really a neuromyth? A meta-analysis of the learning styles matching hypothesis.
Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 10;15:1428732. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1428732. eCollection 2024.
9
A Review of Online Dyslexia Learning Modules.
Front Educ (Lausanne). 2020;5. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2020.00118. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
10
Neuromyths and knowledge about intellectual giftedness in a highly educated multilingual country.
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 20;14:1252239. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1252239. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
The Appeal of the Brain in the Popular Press.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2010 Nov;5(6):762-6. doi: 10.1177/1745691610388779.
2
Three requirements for justifying an educational neuroscience.
Br J Educ Psychol. 2012 Mar;82(Pt 1):1-23. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02068.x.
4
Neuroscience: viable applications in education?
Neuroscientist. 2010 Aug;16(4):349-56. doi: 10.1177/1073858410370900.
5
From scientific theory to classroom practice.
Neuroscientist. 2011 Aug;17(4):382-8. doi: 10.1177/1073858409356111. Epub 2010 May 18.
6
Scepticism is not enough.
Cortex. 2009 Apr;45(4):550-1. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2008.06.002. Epub 2008 Jun 11.
7
The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Mar;20(3):470-7. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20040.
8
Seeing is believing: the effect of brain images on judgments of scientific reasoning.
Cognition. 2008 Apr;107(1):343-52. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.017. Epub 2007 Sep 4.
9
Symbolic arithmetic knowledge without instruction.
Nature. 2007 May 31;447(7144):589-91. doi: 10.1038/nature05850.
10
Neuroscience and education: from research to practice?
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006 May;7(5):406-11. doi: 10.1038/nrn1907.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验