Suppr超能文献

希腊未来教师的脑科学知识与神经迷思的流行情况

Brain Knowledge and the Prevalence of Neuromyths among Prospective Teachers in Greece.

作者信息

Papadatou-Pastou Marietta, Haliou Eleni, Vlachos Filippos

机构信息

Faculty of Primary Education, Research Center for Psychophysiology and Education, School of Education, National and Kapodistrian University of AthensAthens, Greece.

Cognition and Health Research Group, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of OxfordOxford, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2017 May 29;8:804. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00804. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Although very often teachers show a great interest in introducing findings from the field of neuroscience in their classrooms, there is growing concern about the lack of academic instruction on neuroscience on teachers' curricula because this has led to a proliferation of neuromyths. We surveyed 479 undergraduate (mean age = 19.60 years, = 2.29) and 94 postgraduate students (mean age = 28.52 years, = 7.16) enrolled in Departments of Education at the University of Thessaly and the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens. We used a 70-item questionnaire aiming to explore general knowledge on the brain, neuromyths, the participants' attitude toward neuroeducation as well as their reading habits. Prospective teachers were found to believe that neuroscience knowledge is useful for teachers (90.3% agreement), to be somewhat knowledgeable when it comes to the brain (47.33% of the assertions were answered correctly), but to be less well informed when it comes to neuroscientific issues related to special education (36.86% correct responses). Findings further indicate that general knowledge about the brain was found to be the best safeguard against believing in neuromyths. Based on our results we suggest that prospective teachers can benefit from academic instruction on neuroscience. We propose that such instruction takes place in undergraduate courses of Departments of Education and that emphasis is given in debunking neuromyths, enhancing critical reading skills, and dealing with topics relevant to special education.

摘要

尽管教师们常常对在课堂上引入神经科学领域的研究成果表现出极大兴趣,但人们越来越担心教师课程中缺乏神经科学方面的学术指导,因为这导致了神经神话的泛滥。我们对色萨利大学和雅典国立与卡波迪斯特里亚大学教育系的479名本科生(平均年龄 = 19.60岁,标准差 = 2.29)和94名研究生(平均年龄 = 28.52岁,标准差 = 7.16)进行了调查。我们使用了一份包含70个条目的问卷,旨在探索关于大脑的一般知识、神经神话、参与者对神经教育的态度以及他们的阅读习惯。结果发现,未来的教师认为神经科学知识对教师有用(90.3%表示认同),在大脑方面有一定的知识储备(47.33%的断言回答正确),但在与特殊教育相关的神经科学问题上了解较少(36.86%回答正确)。研究结果进一步表明,关于大脑的一般知识是防止相信神经神话的最佳保障。基于我们的研究结果,我们建议未来的教师可以从神经科学的学术指导中受益。我们提议在教育系的本科课程中开展此类指导,并强调破除神经神话、提高批判性阅读技能以及处理与特殊教育相关的主题。

相似文献

1
Brain Knowledge and the Prevalence of Neuromyths among Prospective Teachers in Greece.
Front Psychol. 2017 May 29;8:804. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00804. eCollection 2017.
2
Pre-service Science Teachers' Neuroscience Literacy: Neuromyths and a Professional Understanding of Learning and Memory.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Feb 14;13:20. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00020. eCollection 2019.
3
Neuromyths in Music Education: Prevalence and Predictors of Misconceptions among Teachers and Students.
Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 24;8:629. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00629. eCollection 2017.
4
Neuromyths in Education: Prevalence and Predictors of Misconceptions among Teachers.
Front Psychol. 2012 Oct 18;3:429. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00429. eCollection 2012.
5
The Persistence of Neuromyths in the Educational Settings: A Systematic Review.
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 12;11:591923. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.591923. eCollection 2020.
6
Preservice teachers' neuroscience literacy and perceptions of neuroscience in education: Implications for teacher education.
Trends Neurosci Educ. 2020 Dec;21:100144. doi: 10.1016/j.tine.2020.100144. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
7
Neuromyths: Misconceptions about neurodevelopment by Italian teachers.
Trends Neurosci Educ. 2024 Mar;34:100219. doi: 10.1016/j.tine.2023.100219. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
8
Brain knowledge and predictors of neuromyths among teachers in Morocco.
Trends Neurosci Educ. 2020 Sep;20:100135. doi: 10.1016/j.tine.2020.100135. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
9
Neuromyths about neurodevelopmental disorders in Chilean teachers.
Trends Neurosci Educ. 2023 Dec;33:100218. doi: 10.1016/j.tine.2023.100218. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
10
Educational neuromyths and instructional practices: The case of inclusive education teachers in Hong Kong.
Trends Neurosci Educ. 2024 Mar;34:100221. doi: 10.1016/j.tine.2024.100221. Epub 2024 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effect of Correcting Neuromyths on Students' and Teachers' Later Reasoning.
J Intell. 2024 Oct 1;12(10):98. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12100098.
2
False Beliefs about Mathematics in Spanish Pre-Service Teachers and Relations with Math Anxiety.
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2024 Jun 28;14(7):1913-1926. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe14070127.
3
Neuromyths and knowledge about intellectual giftedness in a highly educated multilingual country.
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 20;14:1252239. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1252239. eCollection 2023.
4
The Prevalence of Educational Neuromyths among Hungarian Pre-Service Teachers.
J Intell. 2023 Feb 3;11(2):31. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11020031.
5
Effect of a Science of Learning Course on Beliefs in Neuromyths and Neuroscience Literacy.
Brain Sci. 2022 Jun 21;12(7):811. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12070811.
7
Interventions to Dispel Neuromyths in Educational Settings-A Review.
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 13;12:719692. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.719692. eCollection 2021.
8
The Persistence of Neuromyths in the Educational Settings: A Systematic Review.
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 12;11:591923. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.591923. eCollection 2020.
9
Pre-service Science Teachers' Neuroscience Literacy: Neuromyths and a Professional Understanding of Learning and Memory.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Feb 14;13:20. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00020. eCollection 2019.
10
Taking an educational psychology course improves neuroscience literacy but does not reduce belief in neuromyths.
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 5;13(2):e0192163. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192163. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Neuromyths in Education: Prevalence among Spanish Teachers and an Exploration of Cross-Cultural Variation.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Oct 13;10:496. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00496. eCollection 2016.
2
A Bridge Too Far - Revisited: Reframing Bruer's Neuroeducation Argument for Modern Science of Learning Practitioners.
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 16;7:377. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00377. eCollection 2016.
3
Learning Styles: Concepts and Evidence.
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2008 Dec;9(3):105-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01038.x. Epub 2008 Dec 1.
4
The Appeal of the Brain in the Popular Press.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2010 Nov;5(6):762-6. doi: 10.1177/1745691610388779.
5
Infusing Neuroscience into Teacher Professional Development.
Educ Res. 2013 Aug-Sep;42(6):317-329. doi: 10.3102/0013189X13499403.
6
Neuroscience and education: myths and messages.
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2014 Dec;15(12):817-24. doi: 10.1038/nrn3817. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
7
Neuroimaging of reading intervention: a systematic review and activation likelihood estimate meta-analysis.
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 10;9(1):e83668. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083668. eCollection 2014.
8
Glial biology in learning and cognition.
Neuroscientist. 2014 Oct;20(5):426-31. doi: 10.1177/1073858413504465. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
9
Shorter lines facilitate reading in those who struggle.
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 5;8(8):e71161. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071161. Print 2013.
10
On the (non) persuasive power of a brain image.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Aug;20(4):720-5. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0391-6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验