• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Dichotomizing rating scale scores in psychiatry: a bad idea?精神科中对评分量表得分的二分法:一个坏主意?
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2013 Mar;22(1):17-9. doi: 10.1017/S2045796012000613. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
[Diagnostic structured interviews in child and adolescent's psychiatry].[儿童和青少年精神病学中的诊断性结构化访谈]
Encephale. 2004 Mar-Apr;30(2):122-34. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95422-x.
4
Breaking up is hard to do: the heartbreak of dichotomizing continuous data.分手很难:对连续数据进行二分法处理时的“心碎”。
Can J Psychiatry. 2002 Apr;47(3):262-6. doi: 10.1177/070674370204700307.
5
Use of the experience sampling method in the context of clinical trials.经验取样法在临床试验中的应用。
Evid Based Ment Health. 2016 Aug;19(3):86-9. doi: 10.1136/ebmental-2016-102418.
6
Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of day care for people with severe mental disorders: (1) acute day hospital versus admission; (2) vocational rehabilitation; (3) day hospital versus outpatient care.针对重度精神障碍患者日间护理效果的系统评价:(1)急性日间医院与住院治疗对比;(2)职业康复;(3)日间医院与门诊护理对比。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(21):1-75. doi: 10.3310/hta5210.
7
Ten-year review of rating scales. I: overview of scale functioning, psychometric properties, and selection.评分量表十年回顾。I:量表功能、心理测量特性及选择概述
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2002 Feb;41(2):114-22. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200202000-00004.
8
Botulinum neurotoxins for the treatment of focal dystonias: Review of rating tools used in clinical trials.用于治疗局限性肌张力障碍的肉毒杆菌神经毒素:临床试验中使用的评级工具综述
Toxicon. 2015 Dec 1;107(Pt A):89-97. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2015.09.010. Epub 2015 Sep 10.
9
The discrepancy between patients and informants on clinician-rated measures in major depressive disorder: implications for clinical trials and clinical practice.在重性抑郁障碍中,患者和知情人在临床医生评定量表上的差异:对临床试验和临床实践的影响。
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2014 Mar;29(2):111-5. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000015.
10
[Social exclusion of the mentally ill -- a critical review and outlook of community psychiatry at the beginning of the 21st century].[精神疾病患者的社会排斥——21世纪初社区精神病学的批判性综述与展望]
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2005 Nov;73(11):664-73. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-830244.

引用本文的文献

1
Triadic shared decision making in emergency psychiatry: an explorative study.急诊精神病学中的三元共同决策:一项探索性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 5;25(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06640-7.
2
Pilot cluster randomised controlled trial of Stepping Stones and Creating Futures Plus to reduce emotional dysregulation among young men in rural areas and urban informal settlements in KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa.在南非夸祖鲁 - 纳塔尔省农村地区和城市非正式定居点开展的“垫脚石”和“共创未来升级版”减少青年男性情绪失调的试点整群随机对照试验。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2024 Dec 26:207640241306062. doi: 10.1177/00207640241306062.
3
Developing clinical prediction models: a step-by-step guide.临床预测模型的建立:分步指南。
BMJ. 2024 Sep 3;386:e078276. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-078276.
4
How to distinguish promotion, prevention and treatment trials in public mental health? Study protocol for the development of the VErona-LUgano Tool (VELUT).如何区分公共精神卫生领域的促进、预防和治疗试验?开发维罗纳-卢加诺工具(VELUT)的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 13;14(8):e082652. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082652.
5
Prediction of antipsychotics efficacy based on a polygenic risk score: a real-world cohort study.基于多基因风险评分的抗精神病药物疗效预测:一项真实世界队列研究。
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Mar 8;15:1274442. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1274442. eCollection 2024.
6
Prevalence and factors associated with suicidal ideation, cannabis, and alcohol use during the COVID-19 pandemic in Saskatchewan: findings from a joint-effect modeling.新冠大流行期间萨斯喀彻温省自杀意念、大麻和酒精使用的流行情况及相关因素:联合效应建模研究结果。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Aug 8;23(1):571. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05051-w.
7
Efficacy of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation for Refractory Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.非侵入性脑刺激治疗难治性强迫症的疗效:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Brain Sci. 2022 Jul 19;12(7):943. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12070943.
8
Personality Traits, Perceived Stress, and Tinnitus-Related Distress in Patients With Chronic Tinnitus: Support for a Vulnerability-Stress Model.慢性耳鸣患者的人格特质、感知压力与耳鸣相关困扰:对易感性-压力模型的支持
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 24;10:3093. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03093. eCollection 2019.
9
UCLA PTSD reaction index for DSM-5 (PTSD-RI-5): a psychometric study of adolescents sampled from communities in eleven countries.加州大学洛杉矶分校《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版创伤后应激障碍反应指数(PTSD-RI-5):对来自11个国家社区的青少年进行的心理测量学研究
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2019 May 7;10(1):1605282. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2019.1605282. eCollection 2019.
10
Unilateral and bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials over 2 decades.单侧和双侧重复经颅磁刺激治疗难治性抑郁症:20 多年来随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2019 May 1;44(3):151-163. doi: 10.1503/jpn.180056.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of paroxetine in the treatment of acute major depression in adults: a systematic re-examination of published and unpublished data from randomized trials.帕罗西汀治疗成人急性重度抑郁症的有效性:对随机试验已发表和未发表数据的系统重新审视。
CMAJ. 2008 Jan 29;178(3):296-305. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.070693.
2
Explanatory and pragmatic trials.解释性试验和实用性试验。
Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc. 2007 Apr-Jun;16(2):124-5. doi: 10.1017/s1121189x00004735.
3
The cost of dichotomising continuous variables.将连续变量二分的代价。
BMJ. 2006 May 6;332(7549):1080. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7549.1080.
4
Effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs in patients with chronic schizophrenia.抗精神病药物对慢性精神分裂症患者的疗效。
N Engl J Med. 2005 Sep 22;353(12):1209-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa051688. Epub 2005 Sep 19.
5
Efficacy of antidepressants in adults.抗抑郁药对成年人的疗效。
BMJ. 2005 Jul 16;331(7509):155-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7509.155.
6
Interpreting treatment effects in randomised trials.解读随机试验中的治疗效果。
BMJ. 1998 Feb 28;316(7132):690-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7132.690.

精神科中对评分量表得分的二分法:一个坏主意?

Dichotomizing rating scale scores in psychiatry: a bad idea?

机构信息

Section of Psychiatry, Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.

出版信息

Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2013 Mar;22(1):17-9. doi: 10.1017/S2045796012000613. Epub 2012 Oct 23.

DOI:10.1017/S2045796012000613
PMID:23089232
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6998334/
Abstract

In psychiatry, the use of rating scales as measures of outcome in clinical trials allows us to generate continuous outcome data, where each individual's outcome is measured in numbers. Continuous outcomes can be divided into two categories, such as improved and not improved, or may be kept continuous. This article briefly presents the main advantages and disadvantages of these two approaches, which are commonly employed in the analyses of rating scale scores in clinical trials and systematic reviews.

摘要

在精神病学中,使用评分量表作为临床试验的结果测量手段,可以生成连续的结果数据,其中每个人的结果都用数字来衡量。连续结果可以分为两类,例如改善和未改善,或者可以保持连续。本文简要介绍了这两种方法的主要优缺点,它们在临床试验和系统评价中评分量表分数分析中经常使用。