Suppr超能文献

非共济失调体征清单(INAS):一种新的临床评估工具的验证。

Inventory of Non-Ataxia Signs (INAS): validation of a new clinical assessment instrument.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Straße 25, Bonn, Germany.

出版信息

Cerebellum. 2013 Jun;12(3):418-28. doi: 10.1007/s12311-012-0421-3.

Abstract

Although ataxia is by definition the prominent symptom of ataxia disorders, there are various neurological signs that may accompany ataxia in affected patients. Reliable and quantitative assessment of these signs is important because they contribute to disability, but may also interfere with ataxia. Therefore we devised the Inventory of Non-Ataxia Signs (INAS), a list of neurological signs that allows determining the presence and severity of non-ataxia signs in a standardized way. INAS underwent a rigorous validation procedure that involved a trial of 140 patients with spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) for testing of inter-rater reliability and another trial of 28 SCA patients to assess short-term intra-rater reliability. In addition, data of the ongoing EUROSCA natural history study were used to determine the reproducibility, responsiveness and validity of INAS. Inter-rater reliability and short-term test-retest reliability was high, both for the total count and for most of the items. However, measures of responsiveness, such as the smallest detectable change and the clinically important change were not satisfactory. In addition, INAS did not differentiate between subjects that were subjectively stable and those that worsened in the 2-year observation period. In summary, INAS and INAS count showed good reproducibility, but unsatisfactory responsiveness. The present analysis and published data from the EUROSCA natural history study suggest that INAS is a valid measure of extracerebellar involvement in progressive ataxia disorders. As such, it is useful as a supplement to the measures of ataxia, but not as a primary outcome measure in future interventional trials.

摘要

虽然定义上共济失调是共济失调障碍的突出症状,但在受影响的患者中,可能伴有各种神经系统体征。这些体征的可靠和定量评估很重要,因为它们会导致残疾,但也可能会干扰共济失调。因此,我们设计了非共济失调体征量表(INAS),这是一个列出神经系统体征的清单,可用于以标准化的方式确定非共济失调体征的存在和严重程度。INAS 经过了严格的验证程序,涉及对 140 名脊髓小脑共济失调(SCA)患者进行了两次试验,以测试组内可靠性,对 28 名 SCA 患者进行了另一次试验,以评估短期组内可靠性。此外,还使用正在进行的 EUROSCA 自然史研究的数据来确定 INAS 的可重复性、反应性和有效性。组内可靠性和短期测试-重测可靠性都很高,无论是总计数还是大多数项目。然而,反应性的测量指标,如最小可检测变化和临床重要变化并不令人满意。此外,INAS 无法区分主观稳定和在 2 年观察期内恶化的患者。总之,INAS 和 INAS 计数具有良好的可重复性,但反应性不佳。本分析和来自 EUROSCA 自然史研究的已发表数据表明,INAS 是评估进行性共济失调障碍中脑外受累的有效方法。因此,它可作为共济失调测量的补充,但不适用于未来干预试验中的主要结局指标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验