• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

输血医学中的错误报告:一项患者安全举措。

Error reporting in transfusion medicine at a tertiary care centre: a patient safety initiative.

机构信息

Department of Transfusion Medicine, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India.

出版信息

Clin Chem Lab Med. 2012 Nov;50(11):1935-43. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2012-0212.

DOI:10.1515/cclm-2012-0212
PMID:23093085
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Errors in the transfusion process can compromise patient safety. A study was undertaken at our center to identify the errors in the transfusion process and their causes in order to reduce their occurrence by corrective and preventive actions.

METHODS

All near miss, no harm events and adverse events reported in the 'transfusion process' during 1 year study period were recorded, classified and analyzed at a tertiary care teaching hospital in North India.

RESULTS

In total, 285 transfusion related events were reported during the study period. Of these, there were four adverse (1.5%), 10 no harm (3.5%) and 271 (95%) near miss events. Incorrect blood component transfusion rate was 1 in 6031 component units. ABO incompatible transfusion rate was one in 15,077 component units issued or one in 26,200 PRBC units issued and acute hemolytic transfusion reaction due to ABO incompatible transfusion was 1 in 60,309 component units issued. Fifty-three percent of the antecedent near miss events were bedside events. Patient sample handling errors were the single largest category of errors (n=94, 33%) followed by errors in labeling and blood component handling and storage in user areas.

CONCLUSIONS

The actual and near miss event data obtained through this initiative provided us with clear evidence about latent defects and critical points in the transfusion process so that corrective and preventive actions could be taken to reduce errors and improve transfusion safety.

摘要

背景

输血过程中的错误可能危及患者安全。我们中心进行了一项研究,以确定输血过程中的错误及其原因,以便通过纠正和预防措施减少其发生。

方法

在印度北部的一家三级护理教学医院,记录、分类和分析了为期 1 年研究期间在“输血过程”中报告的所有接近伤害、无伤害和不良事件。

结果

在研究期间,共报告了 285 起与输血相关的事件。其中,有 4 起不良事件(1.5%)、10 起无伤害事件(3.5%)和 271 起接近伤害事件(95%)。错误输注血液成分的比例为每 6031 个成分单位 1 次。ABO 不相容输血的比例为每 15077 个发出的成分单位或每 26200 个发出的 PRBC 单位 1 次,由于 ABO 不相容输血导致的急性溶血性输血反应为每 60309 个发出的成分单位 1 次。53%的前因接近伤害事件是床边事件。患者样本处理错误是错误中最大的类别(n=94,33%),其次是标签和血液成分处理以及在用户区域的储存错误。

结论

通过这一举措获得的实际和接近伤害事件数据为我们提供了关于输血过程中潜在缺陷和关键点的明确证据,以便采取纠正和预防措施减少错误并提高输血安全性。

相似文献

1
Error reporting in transfusion medicine at a tertiary care centre: a patient safety initiative.输血医学中的错误报告:一项患者安全举措。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2012 Nov;50(11):1935-43. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2012-0212.
2
Getting the right blood to the right patient: the contribution of near-miss event reporting and barrier analysis.将正确的血液输给正确的患者:险些发生的事件报告及障碍分析的作用
Transfus Clin Biol. 2005 Nov;12(5):380-4. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2005.10.003. Epub 2005 Nov 28.
3
Seven hundred and fifty-nine (759) chances to learn: a 3-year pilot project to analyse transfusion-related near-miss events in the Republic of Ireland.759次学习机会:一项为期三年的试点项目,旨在分析爱尔兰共和国与输血相关的未遂事件。
Vox Sang. 2007 Apr;92(3):233-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2006.00885.x.
4
Reporting of near-miss events for transfusion medicine: improving transfusion safety.输血医学中险些发生的不良事件报告:提高输血安全性。
Transfusion. 2001 Oct;41(10):1204-11. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2001.41101204.x.
5
Experience with the medical event reporting system for transfusion medicine (MERS-TM) at three hospitals.三家医院的输血医学医疗事件报告系统(MERS-TM)的经验。
Transfus Apher Sci. 2004 Oct;31(2):133-43. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2004.07.007.
6
Hospital-based transfusion error tracking from 2005 to 2010: identifying the key errors threatening patient transfusion safety.2005 年至 2010 年基于医院的输血错误跟踪:确定威胁患者输血安全的关键错误。
Transfusion. 2014 Jan;54(1):66-73; quiz 65. doi: 10.1111/trf.12240. Epub 2013 May 14.
7
Implementation of an event reporting system in a transfusion medicine unit: a local experience.输血医学科事件报告系统的实施:本地经验
Malays J Pathol. 2004 Jun;26(1):43-8.
8
Error reporting in transfusion medicine: an important tool to improve patient safety.输血医学中的差错报告:提高患者安全的重要工具。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2012 Nov;50(11):1871-2. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2012-0349.
9
Root cause analysis of transfusion error: identifying causes to implement changes.输血错误的根本原因分析:确定原因以实施变更。
Transfusion. 2010 Dec;50(12 Pt 2):2772-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02943.x.
10
Report on errors in pretransfusion testing from a tertiary care center: A step toward transfusion safety.三级医疗中心输血前检测错误报告:迈向输血安全的一步。
Asian J Transfus Sci. 2016 Jan-Jun;10(1):48-52. doi: 10.4103/0973-6247.175402.

引用本文的文献

1
Transfusion-related errors and associated adverse reactions and blood product wastage as reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network Hemovigilance Module, 2014-2022.2014-2022 年向国家医疗保健安全网络血液监测模块报告的与输血相关的错误及相关不良反应和血液制品浪费。
Transfusion. 2024 Apr;64(4):627-637. doi: 10.1111/trf.17775. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
2
Investigating the quality of hemovigilance process using the first two steps of Six Sigma model: a cross-sectional study.采用六西格玛模型的前两步调查血液警戒过程的质量:一项横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 27;23(1):1169. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10113-6.
3
Prevalence of Near-miss Events of Transfusion Practice and Its Associated Factors amongst House Officers in a Teaching Hospital.
教学医院住院医师输血操作险些发生事件的发生率及其相关因素
Oman Med J. 2021 Mar 31;36(2):e249. doi: 10.5001/omj.2021.55. eCollection 2021 Mar.
4
Assessment of bedside transfusion practices at a tertiary care center: A step closer to controlling the chaos.三级医疗中心床边输血操作评估:向控制混乱迈进了一步。
Asian J Transfus Sci. 2018 Jan-Jun;12(1):27-33. doi: 10.4103/ajts.AJTS_29_17.
5
Report on errors in pretransfusion testing from a tertiary care center: A step toward transfusion safety.三级医疗中心输血前检测错误报告:迈向输血安全的一步。
Asian J Transfus Sci. 2016 Jan-Jun;10(1):48-52. doi: 10.4103/0973-6247.175402.