• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Report on errors in pretransfusion testing from a tertiary care center: A step toward transfusion safety.三级医疗中心输血前检测错误报告:迈向输血安全的一步。
Asian J Transfus Sci. 2016 Jan-Jun;10(1):48-52. doi: 10.4103/0973-6247.175402.
2
Error reporting in transfusion medicine at a tertiary care centre: a patient safety initiative.输血医学中的错误报告:一项患者安全举措。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2012 Nov;50(11):1935-43. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2012-0212.
3
The role of comprehensive check at the blood bank reception on blood requisitions in detecting potential transfusion errors.血库接收处对用血申请进行全面检查在检测潜在输血错误方面的作用。
Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2015 Jun;31(2):269-74. doi: 10.1007/s12288-014-0444-7. Epub 2014 Aug 17.
4
Reporting of near-miss events for transfusion medicine: improving transfusion safety.输血医学中险些发生的不良事件报告:提高输血安全性。
Transfusion. 2001 Oct;41(10):1204-11. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2001.41101204.x.
5
Getting the right blood to the right patient: the contribution of near-miss event reporting and barrier analysis.将正确的血液输给正确的患者:险些发生的事件报告及障碍分析的作用
Transfus Clin Biol. 2005 Nov;12(5):380-4. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2005.10.003. Epub 2005 Nov 28.
6
Hospital-based transfusion error tracking from 2005 to 2010: identifying the key errors threatening patient transfusion safety.2005 年至 2010 年基于医院的输血错误跟踪:确定威胁患者输血安全的关键错误。
Transfusion. 2014 Jan;54(1):66-73; quiz 65. doi: 10.1111/trf.12240. Epub 2013 May 14.
7
Experience with the medical event reporting system for transfusion medicine (MERS-TM) at three hospitals.三家医院的输血医学医疗事件报告系统(MERS-TM)的经验。
Transfus Apher Sci. 2004 Oct;31(2):133-43. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2004.07.007.
8
Addressing sample identification errors in a multispecialty tertiary care hospital in Bangalore.解决班加罗尔一家多专科三级护理医院中的样本识别错误问题。
Vox Sang. 2014 Aug;107(2):153-7. doi: 10.1111/vox.12139. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
9
Reducing adverse events in blood transfusion.减少输血不良反应
Br J Haematol. 2005 Oct;131(1):8-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05702.x.
10
Seven hundred and fifty-nine (759) chances to learn: a 3-year pilot project to analyse transfusion-related near-miss events in the Republic of Ireland.759次学习机会:一项为期三年的试点项目,旨在分析爱尔兰共和国与输血相关的未遂事件。
Vox Sang. 2007 Apr;92(3):233-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2006.00885.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating the quality of hemovigilance process using the first two steps of Six Sigma model: a cross-sectional study.采用六西格玛模型的前两步调查血液警戒过程的质量:一项横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 27;23(1):1169. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10113-6.
2
Prevalence of Near-miss Events of Transfusion Practice and Its Associated Factors amongst House Officers in a Teaching Hospital.教学医院住院医师输血操作险些发生事件的发生率及其相关因素
Oman Med J. 2021 Mar 31;36(2):e249. doi: 10.5001/omj.2021.55. eCollection 2021 Mar.
3
ABO-Incompatible Transfusion Events Reported in Written Judgments and in the Korean Hemovigilance System.书面判决和韩国血液警戒系统中报告的ABO血型不相容输血事件。
Ann Lab Med. 2021 Sep 1;41(5):493-498. doi: 10.3343/alm.2021.41.5.493.
4
Benefits of VISION Max automated cross-matching in comparison with manual cross-matching: A multidimensional analysis.VISION Max 自动化交叉配血与手动交叉配血的比较优势:多维分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 23;14(12):e0226477. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226477. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
The role of comprehensive check at the blood bank reception on blood requisitions in detecting potential transfusion errors.血库接收处对用血申请进行全面检查在检测潜在输血错误方面的作用。
Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2015 Jun;31(2):269-74. doi: 10.1007/s12288-014-0444-7. Epub 2014 Aug 17.
2
Hospital-based transfusion error tracking from 2005 to 2010: identifying the key errors threatening patient transfusion safety.2005 年至 2010 年基于医院的输血错误跟踪:确定威胁患者输血安全的关键错误。
Transfusion. 2014 Jan;54(1):66-73; quiz 65. doi: 10.1111/trf.12240. Epub 2013 May 14.
3
Hemovigilance program-India.印度血液监测计划。
Asian J Transfus Sci. 2013 Jan;7(1):73-4. doi: 10.4103/0973-6247.106744.
4
Error reporting in transfusion medicine at a tertiary care centre: a patient safety initiative.输血医学中的错误报告:一项患者安全举措。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2012 Nov;50(11):1935-43. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2012-0212.
5
Transfusion-associated circulatory overload after plasma transfusion.血浆输注后相关性循环超负荷。
Transfusion. 2012 Jan;52(1):160-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03247.x. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
6
'Wrong blood in tube': solutions for a persistent problem.“采血管错误”:一个长期存在问题的解决方案。
Vox Sang. 2011 Apr;100(3):298-302. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2010.01391.x. Epub 2010 Aug 25.
7
Strict adherence to a blood bank specimen labeling policy by all clinical laboratories significantly reduces the incidence of "wrong blood in tube".
Am J Clin Pathol. 2009 Aug;132(2):164-8; quiz 306. doi: 10.1309/AJCPOJA2JRVX0IWC.
8
Reducing the amount of blood transfused: a systematic review of behavioral interventions to change physicians' transfusion practices.减少输血量:对改变医生输血行为的干预措施的系统评价
Arch Intern Med. 2005 Apr 25;165(8):845-52. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.8.845.
9
An international study of the performance of sample collection from patients.一项关于从患者身上采集样本操作的国际研究。
Vox Sang. 2003 Jul;85(1):40-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1423-0410.2003.00313.x.
10
Hemovigilance network in France: organization and analysis of immediate transfusion incident reports from 1994 to 1998.法国的血液警戒网络:1994年至1998年即时输血事件报告的组织与分析
Transfusion. 2002 Oct;42(10):1356-64. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2002.00202.x.

三级医疗中心输血前检测错误报告:迈向输血安全的一步。

Report on errors in pretransfusion testing from a tertiary care center: A step toward transfusion safety.

作者信息

Sidhu Meena, Meenia Renu, Akhter Naveen, Sawhney Vijay, Irm Yasmeen

机构信息

Department of Transfusion Medicine, Government Medical College, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, India.

出版信息

Asian J Transfus Sci. 2016 Jan-Jun;10(1):48-52. doi: 10.4103/0973-6247.175402.

DOI:10.4103/0973-6247.175402
PMID:27011670
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4782493/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Errors in the process of pretransfusion testing for blood transfusion can occur at any stage from collection of the sample to administration of the blood component. The present study was conducted to analyze the errors that threaten patients' transfusion safety and actual harm/serious adverse events that occurred to the patients due to these errors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The prospective study was conducted in the Department Of Transfusion Medicine, Shri Maharaja Gulab Singh Hospital, Government Medical College, Jammu, India from January 2014 to December 2014 for a period of 1 year. Errors were defined as any deviation from established policies and standard operating procedures. A near-miss event was defined as those errors, which did not reach the patient. Location and time of occurrence of the events/errors were also noted.

RESULTS

A total of 32,672 requisitions for the transfusion of blood and blood components were received for typing and cross-matching. Out of these, 26,683 products were issued to the various clinical departments. A total of 2,229 errors were detected over a period of 1 year. Near-miss events constituted 53% of the errors and actual harmful events due to errors occurred in 0.26% of the patients. Sample labeling errors were 2.4%, inappropriate request for blood components 2%, and information on requisition forms not matching with that on the sample 1.5% of all the requisitions received were the most frequent errors in clinical services. In transfusion services, the most common event was accepting sample in error with the frequency of 0.5% of all requisitions. ABO incompatible hemolytic reactions were the most frequent harmful event with the frequency of 2.2/10,000 transfusions.

CONCLUSION

Sample labeling, inappropriate request, and sample received in error were the most frequent high-risk errors.

摘要

引言

输血前检测过程中的错误可能发生在从样本采集到血液成分输注的任何阶段。本研究旨在分析威胁患者输血安全的错误以及因这些错误导致患者发生的实际伤害/严重不良事件。

材料与方法

本前瞻性研究于2014年1月至2014年12月在印度查谟政府医学院斯里·马哈拉贾·古拉布·辛格医院输血医学科进行,为期1年。错误被定义为任何偏离既定政策和标准操作程序的情况。险些发生的事件被定义为那些未影响到患者的错误。还记录了事件/错误发生的地点和时间。

结果

共收到32672份输血及血液成分配型的申请。其中,26683份产品发放给了各个临床科室。在1年的时间里共检测到2229起错误。险些发生的事件占错误的53%,因错误导致的实际有害事件发生在0.26%的患者中。样本标签错误占所有收到申请的2.4%,血液成分申请不当占2%,申请表格上的信息与样本信息不匹配占1.5%,这些是临床服务中最常见的错误。在输血服务中,最常见的事件是误收样本,占所有申请的0.5%。ABO血型不合的溶血性反应是最常见的有害事件,发生率为每10000次输血2.2例。

结论

样本标签、申请不当和误收样本是最常见的高风险错误。